[#4858] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — noreply@...

Bugs item #1883, was opened at 2005-05-06 14:55

21 messages 2005/05/06
[#4862] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/05/07

Hi,

[#4865] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2005/05/07

[#4868] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — nobu.nokada@... 2005/05/07

Hi,

[#5053] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2005/05/19

Hi,

[#5056] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Mark Hubbart <discordantus@...> 2005/05/19

On 5/19/05, Shugo Maeda <shugo@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#4874] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

Hello all,

31 messages 2005/05/10
[#4879] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Pit Capitain <pit@...> 2005/05/11

Ilias Lazaridis schrieb:

[#4883] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

Pit Capitain wrote:

[#4884] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2005/05/12

[#4888] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

Ryan Davis wrote:

[#4889] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — ES <ruby-ml@...> 2005/05/12

[#4890] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

ES wrote:

[#4891] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Alexander Kellett <ruby-lists@...> 2005/05/12

On May 12, 2005, at 3:13 PM, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:

[#4911] Pointless argc check in Array#select — noreply@...

Patches item #1900, was opened at 2005-05-12 09:33

11 messages 2005/05/12

[#4919] - Hierarchical/Modular Directory Structure — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

The source-code structure should be simplified, lowering barriers for

20 messages 2005/05/12

Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal

From: Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>
Date: 2005-05-12 15:27:15 UTC
List: ruby-core #4906
Hugh Sasse wrote:
> On Thu, 12 May 2005, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:
>> nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> What do you expect by "thin"?
>>
>> I will try.
>>
>> * the core ruby interpreter, with the minimal necessary libraries.
> 
> Do you mean core libraries, not standard libraries -- exclude things
> you must "require" to obtain?   

would be a good starting point - and a code-unit to isolate.

> That way you'd only get the builtin
> classes like Array, Hash, Regexp....  This seems a useful goal, that
> I have asked for in the past:
> 
> http://www.rubygarden.org/ruby?BatteriesExcludedDistribution

ok

> Your use of 'necessary' doesn't specify 'for what'.

ok

to have a workable ruby interpreter, with the main (core) language 
constructs (which can esility be removed further, thus minimzing the 
core even more, without beiing a full ruby anymore).

This would open up new use-cases, especially for embedding.

>>>>> When building Ruby, one of the first things created is a "miniruby" 
[...] - (makefiles)

>> Which tool can I use to view/modify this file conveniently?
> 
> It is Makefile.sub, not a Makefile as such.  The complexity is due
[...]

I simply like to understand the subsystems of ruby out of the sources.

As I can see, the makefiles cannot be used for this.

>> Alternatively
>>
>> I would like to have a simple makefile, like:
>>
>> CC main.c
>> CC class.c
>> CC ...
>>
>> LINK ruby.exe main.obj, class.obj, ...
> 
> That isn't actually a makefile.  There is no means of avoiding
[...]

of course.

I like to extract the structure of the ruby sources.

to do so, I could write fully manually a simple makefile.

>> There is no structure in the source-code, where I could detect the 
>> subsystems.
> 
> Which source code files do you refer to with this remark?

I mean the whole contents of the folder "ruby-1.8.2".

the problem starts with a missing "src" folder, which would isolate the 
source-code-files from the other files in the root directory.

.

-- 
http://lazaridis.com


In This Thread