[#4858] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — noreply@...

Bugs item #1883, was opened at 2005-05-06 14:55

21 messages 2005/05/06
[#4862] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/05/07

Hi,

[#4865] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2005/05/07

[#4868] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — nobu.nokada@... 2005/05/07

Hi,

[#5053] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2005/05/19

Hi,

[#5056] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1883 ] Build fails on OSX Tiger 10.4 — Mark Hubbart <discordantus@...> 2005/05/19

On 5/19/05, Shugo Maeda <shugo@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#4874] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

Hello all,

31 messages 2005/05/10
[#4879] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Pit Capitain <pit@...> 2005/05/11

Ilias Lazaridis schrieb:

[#4883] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

Pit Capitain wrote:

[#4884] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2005/05/12

[#4888] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

Ryan Davis wrote:

[#4889] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — ES <ruby-ml@...> 2005/05/12

[#4890] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/05/12

ES wrote:

[#4891] Re: [THIN] - Need to reduce Ruby Sources to the Minimal — Alexander Kellett <ruby-lists@...> 2005/05/12

On May 12, 2005, at 3:13 PM, Ilias Lazaridis wrote:

[#4911] Pointless argc check in Array#select — noreply@...

Patches item #1900, was opened at 2005-05-12 09:33

11 messages 2005/05/12

[#4919] - Hierarchical/Modular Directory Structure — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

The source-code structure should be simplified, lowering barriers for

20 messages 2005/05/12

Re: [PATCH] Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings

From: Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@...>
Date: 2005-05-14 15:28:14 UTC
List: ruby-core #4984
On 5/14/05, nobu.nokada@softhome.net <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> At Sat, 14 May 2005 21:58:29 +0900,
> Erik Huelsmann wrote in [ruby-core:04980]:
> > > I think AC_TYPE_UID_T and AC_TYPE_PID_T also would be
> > > needed to remove.
> >
> > Yes. Though I have not been able to find any reference to
> > AC_TYPE_PID_T, I did remove AC_TYPE_UID_T.
> 
> Sorry, AC_TYPE_PID_T was inserted locally, but AC_TYPE_SIZE_T
> has no problem with APR?

Not with APR, but probably with other software which defines and uses
POSIX types in their Windows port.

> > > > +#if ! HAVE_PID_T
> > > > +  typedef int rb_pid_t;
> > > > +#else
> > > > +  typedef pid_t rb_pid_t;
> > > > +#endif
> > >
> > > Why not #ifdef?
> > Error on my part. Corrected in the attached patch.
> 
> > +#ifdef HAVE_PID_T
> > +  typedef int rb_pid_t;
> > +#else
> > +  typedef pid_t rb_pid_t;
> > +#endif
> 
> Seems inverted.

Ouch! Yes, it's inverted.

> Anyway, since I consider this useful and necessary, am going to
> commit it with correcting above #ifdef.

Thanks!

If you want to, I can search and replace any other POSIXly defined
types which are also defined in the ruby headers of any non-posix
system. That would include AC_TYPE_SIZE_T.

Thoughts?

bye,


Erik.


In This Thread