[#3109] Is divmod dangerous? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

14 messages 2000/06/06

[#3149] Retrieving the hostname and port in net/http — Roland Jesse <jesse@...>

Hi,

12 messages 2000/06/07

[#3222] Ruby coding standard? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

16 messages 2000/06/09

[#3277] Re: BUG or something? — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> |I am new to Ruby and this brings up a question I have had

17 messages 2000/06/12
[#3281] Re: BUG or something? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/06/12

Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com> writes:

[#3296] RE: about documentation — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> I want to contribute to the ruby project in my spare time.

15 messages 2000/06/12

[#3407] Waffling between Python and Ruby — "Warren Postma" <embed@...>

I was looking at the Ruby editor/IDE for windows and was disappointed with

19 messages 2000/06/14

[#3410] Exercice: Translate into Ruby :-) — Jilani Khaldi <jilanik@...>

Hi All,

17 messages 2000/06/14

[#3415] Re: Waffling between Python and Ruby — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

>Static typing..., hmm,...

11 messages 2000/06/14

[#3453] Re: Static Typing( Was: Waffling between Python and Ruby) — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

32 messages 2000/06/16

[#3516] Deep copy? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

Given that I cannot overload =, how should I go about ensuring a deep

20 messages 2000/06/19

[#3694] Why it's quiet — hal9000@...

We are all busy learning the new language

26 messages 2000/06/29
[#3703] Re: Why it's quiet — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2000/06/30

Hi,

[#3705] Re: Why it's quiet — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/06/30

Hi,

[ruby-talk:03720] Re: Why it's quiet -- Ruby features.

From: Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
Date: 2000-06-30 12:25:59 UTC
List: ruby-talk #3720
Conrad Schneiker <schneik@austin.ibm.com> writes:

> Any chance that Ruby 1.6+ will have a built-in standard
> multidimensional array?  Especially since 2-D arrays are a very
> common data type that seem to turn up frequently in tables for
> general data processing, plus for graphics, math, engineering, and
> physics?

Apart from performance, are there any advantages to building this in,
rather than using the array and matrix library modules?

In general, I'd suggest that one of the charms of Ruby is its small
conceptual size. Even though many of the basic types are built in, we
can pretend that they're not, that instead they are add-in library
modules. The built in types do not add any new syntax to the language.

My vote for future enhancements would be that if it _can_ be done
outside the core of the language, it _should_ be done outside the
core.


Regards


Dave

In This Thread