[#3109] Is divmod dangerous? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

14 messages 2000/06/06

[#3149] Retrieving the hostname and port in net/http — Roland Jesse <jesse@...>

Hi,

12 messages 2000/06/07

[#3222] Ruby coding standard? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

16 messages 2000/06/09

[#3277] Re: BUG or something? — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> |I am new to Ruby and this brings up a question I have had

17 messages 2000/06/12
[#3281] Re: BUG or something? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/06/12

Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com> writes:

[#3296] RE: about documentation — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> I want to contribute to the ruby project in my spare time.

15 messages 2000/06/12

[#3407] Waffling between Python and Ruby — "Warren Postma" <embed@...>

I was looking at the Ruby editor/IDE for windows and was disappointed with

19 messages 2000/06/14

[#3410] Exercice: Translate into Ruby :-) — Jilani Khaldi <jilanik@...>

Hi All,

17 messages 2000/06/14

[#3415] Re: Waffling between Python and Ruby — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

>Static typing..., hmm,...

11 messages 2000/06/14

[#3453] Re: Static Typing( Was: Waffling between Python and Ruby) — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

32 messages 2000/06/16

[#3516] Deep copy? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

Given that I cannot overload =, how should I go about ensuring a deep

20 messages 2000/06/19

[#3694] Why it's quiet — hal9000@...

We are all busy learning the new language

26 messages 2000/06/29
[#3703] Re: Why it's quiet — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2000/06/30

Hi,

[#3705] Re: Why it's quiet — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/06/30

Hi,

[ruby-talk:03143] Re: Is divmod dangerous?

From: Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>
Date: 2000-06-07 04:12:28 UTC
List: ruby-talk #3143
Hi

Dave Thomas wrote:

> Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> writes:
>
> > We have two basic methods,  Integer#div (the current behavior) and
> > Integer#divz, which truncates towards zero. Associated with these are
> > corresponding modulo routines, #mod (the current behavior) and #modz
> > (which is equivalent to remainder).
> >
> > Then, we have two 'personalities', which are actually just modules.
>
> btw. Andy tells me that this is horrible.
>
> In that case, I vote for Python quotients.

You could also cross-post a query on comp.lang.python about this, asking:
(1) why it was done the way it was done, (2) what the less-obvious
ramifications and trade-offs were, (3) whether it still seems like the
right thing to do in retrospect, and (4) what the implications were for
various Python numeric modules. (A similar inquiry might also be directed
to comp.lang.perl.misc and comp.lang.perl.modules.)

One possibly strong reason for copying Python quotients is to facilitate
the use and porting of Python numeric modules and programs.

--
Conrad Schneiker
(This note is unofficial and subject to improvement without notice.)



In This Thread