[ruby-talk:03674] Re: Perl and Ruby: an Irony

>>>>> "Dat" == Dat Nguyen <[e-mail]> writes:

    >> From: Clemens Hintze <[e-mail]> Reply-To:
    >> [e-mail] To: [e-mail] (ruby-talk
    >> ML) Subject: [ruby-talk:03659] Re: Perl and Ruby: an Irony
    >> Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2000 09:05:00 GMT

...

    Dat> Clement,

Dat,

    Dat> Take it easy, it's a compliment to the answer of my
    Dat> question. I am exploring and learning a new language. Your

sorry about that! I was thinking that it was NO compliment, but I was
wrong here! Sorry again. As I said: my English is much worse than I
thought :-(

    Dat> english is much better than mine, but if you are more

I do not think so! I often prove to get things wrong in English ...

    Dat> comfortable with your native language, feel free to do so.

    Dat> Ich lasse mich nicht von Deinen Bemerkungen irritieren, es
    Dat> war nur Fragen und Antworten, Du brauchst nicht diese als
    Dat> eine Gelengenheit Deinen Dienst fu"r Ruby zu beklamieren.

Ey! You are speaking German very well! How do you come to learn such
damned difficult language? :-)

BTW: Darf ich fragen, was beklamieren bedeuten soll? Entschuldige
bitte, aber ich kann mir wirklich nicht denken, was Du hiermit sagen
wolltest!

But may I add, I really doesn't want to search an opportunity for
defend Ruby here. But your statement was too simple then. I think if
somebody, who has not decided whether to take Perl or Ruby, read your
article he could get wrong impression, I fear.

But I admit I have overreacted (certainly the wrong word) here. So,
sorry again!

    Dat> mfg Dat

And that abbreviation you know as well ... astonishing!

In that sense,

MfG,
\cle