[#3109] Is divmod dangerous? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

14 messages 2000/06/06

[#3149] Retrieving the hostname and port in net/http — Roland Jesse <jesse@...>

Hi,

12 messages 2000/06/07

[#3222] Ruby coding standard? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

16 messages 2000/06/09

[#3277] Re: BUG or something? — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> |I am new to Ruby and this brings up a question I have had

17 messages 2000/06/12
[#3281] Re: BUG or something? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/06/12

Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com> writes:

[#3296] RE: about documentation — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> I want to contribute to the ruby project in my spare time.

15 messages 2000/06/12

[#3407] Waffling between Python and Ruby — "Warren Postma" <embed@...>

I was looking at the Ruby editor/IDE for windows and was disappointed with

19 messages 2000/06/14

[#3410] Exercice: Translate into Ruby :-) — Jilani Khaldi <jilanik@...>

Hi All,

17 messages 2000/06/14

[#3415] Re: Waffling between Python and Ruby — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

>Static typing..., hmm,...

11 messages 2000/06/14

[#3453] Re: Static Typing( Was: Waffling between Python and Ruby) — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

32 messages 2000/06/16

[#3516] Deep copy? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

Given that I cannot overload =, how should I go about ensuring a deep

20 messages 2000/06/19

[#3694] Why it's quiet — hal9000@...

We are all busy learning the new language

26 messages 2000/06/29
[#3703] Re: Why it's quiet — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2000/06/30

Hi,

[#3705] Re: Why it's quiet — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/06/30

Hi,

[ruby-talk:03651] Re: Embedding RubyUnit

From: Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>
Date: 2000-06-24 20:27:12 UTC
List: ruby-talk #3651
Hi,

Masaki Suketa wrote:

> Hello,
>
> In message "[ruby-talk:03617] Re: Embedding RubyUnit"
>     on 00/06/22, "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@jump.net> writes:
>
> > > % rubytest myfile.rb      # Are you testing Ruby interpreter itself?
> > > % rubyUnitTest myfile.rb  # Too long?
> > > % ruby test myfile.rb     # Too abstract?
> >
> > These would all be OK with me, although I like "rubytest myfile.rb" the
> > best.
>
> % rbtest myfile.rb # Too criptic to confuse?

I think that is OK too, since every new Ruby user soon learns that ".rb"
means Ruby.

In fact, rb<whatever> might be a good general convention to follow for all
standard Ruby utility programs.

--
Conrad Schneiker
(This note is unofficial and subject to improvement without notice.)



In This Thread

Prev Next