[#3109] Is divmod dangerous? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

14 messages 2000/06/06

[#3149] Retrieving the hostname and port in net/http — Roland Jesse <jesse@...>

Hi,

12 messages 2000/06/07

[#3222] Ruby coding standard? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

16 messages 2000/06/09

[#3277] Re: BUG or something? — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> |I am new to Ruby and this brings up a question I have had

17 messages 2000/06/12
[#3281] Re: BUG or something? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/06/12

Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com> writes:

[#3296] RE: about documentation — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> I want to contribute to the ruby project in my spare time.

15 messages 2000/06/12

[#3407] Waffling between Python and Ruby — "Warren Postma" <embed@...>

I was looking at the Ruby editor/IDE for windows and was disappointed with

19 messages 2000/06/14

[#3410] Exercice: Translate into Ruby :-) — Jilani Khaldi <jilanik@...>

Hi All,

17 messages 2000/06/14

[#3415] Re: Waffling between Python and Ruby — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

>Static typing..., hmm,...

11 messages 2000/06/14

[#3453] Re: Static Typing( Was: Waffling between Python and Ruby) — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

32 messages 2000/06/16

[#3516] Deep copy? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

Given that I cannot overload =, how should I go about ensuring a deep

20 messages 2000/06/19

[#3694] Why it's quiet — hal9000@...

We are all busy learning the new language

26 messages 2000/06/29
[#3703] Re: Why it's quiet — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2000/06/30

Hi,

[#3705] Re: Why it's quiet — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/06/30

Hi,

[ruby-talk:03718] Re: Your pallet service

From: Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
Date: 2000-06-30 10:18:45 UTC
List: ruby-talk #3718
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marie_Cook@fastermail.com [mailto:Marie_Cook@fastermail.com]
> Sent: den 30 juni 2000 10:29
> To: ruby-talk@netlab.co.jp
> Subject: [ruby-talk:03715] re: Your pallet service

I think Marie Cook has misunderstood the role of this list. I think we've
got few unrelated mails already and I fear we'll get plenty in the future.

So if this mail was posted directly to the list maybe we could have
prevented it with a simple filter. If a mail doesn't come from a subscriber
and doesn't contain some list of keywords ('ruby' at least :) it could be
forwarded to Matz or someone and he could check it and post to the list.

These are just a minor inconvinience now but will get bigger all the time
when:
- the number of the inappropriate mails will grow
- the number of recipients will grow
- the searchers of the historical information do what they want (list
archive)

	- Aleksi

In This Thread

Prev Next