[#3109] Is divmod dangerous? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

14 messages 2000/06/06

[#3149] Retrieving the hostname and port in net/http — Roland Jesse <jesse@...>

Hi,

12 messages 2000/06/07

[#3222] Ruby coding standard? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

16 messages 2000/06/09

[#3277] Re: BUG or something? — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> |I am new to Ruby and this brings up a question I have had

17 messages 2000/06/12
[#3281] Re: BUG or something? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/06/12

Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com> writes:

[#3296] RE: about documentation — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> I want to contribute to the ruby project in my spare time.

15 messages 2000/06/12

[#3407] Waffling between Python and Ruby — "Warren Postma" <embed@...>

I was looking at the Ruby editor/IDE for windows and was disappointed with

19 messages 2000/06/14

[#3410] Exercice: Translate into Ruby :-) — Jilani Khaldi <jilanik@...>

Hi All,

17 messages 2000/06/14

[#3415] Re: Waffling between Python and Ruby — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

>Static typing..., hmm,...

11 messages 2000/06/14

[#3453] Re: Static Typing( Was: Waffling between Python and Ruby) — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

32 messages 2000/06/16

[#3516] Deep copy? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

Given that I cannot overload =, how should I go about ensuring a deep

20 messages 2000/06/19

[#3694] Why it's quiet — hal9000@...

We are all busy learning the new language

26 messages 2000/06/29
[#3703] Re: Why it's quiet — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2000/06/30

Hi,

[#3705] Re: Why it's quiet — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/06/30

Hi,

[ruby-talk:03368] Re: chomp!

From: "David Douthitt" <DDouthitt@...>
Date: 2000-06-13 15:20:05 UTC
List: ruby-talk #3368

>>> Dave@thomases.com 6/13/00 10:11a >>>
"David Douthitt" <DDouthitt@cuna.com> writes:

>> I was looking at the documentation for chomp and chomp! - and the
>> results of chomp startled me to say the least.

>Maybe, but it wouldn't be 'chomp'. Chomp removes the given
>string (defaulting to a newline) from the end of another string
>(in this case $_). It's typically used to remove newlines from
>stuff you read in:

>This is a a bone unashamedly thrown to the Perl converts.

Like me :-)

I would have described chomp and chomp! as removing a new line,
if present, otherwise not affecting the string at all.

This is what it does in Perl 5.  In Perl 4, one used chop - which removed
the last character (new line or not! :-)

>> Also, the description for chomp! appears to be the same as for chomp
>> - which it is not after CAREFUL examination.

>chomp:
>       Equivalent to $_.chomp!(aString), except nil is never
>       returned. If $_ is changed, the new version is returned,
>       otherwise a copy of the original value is returned. See
>       String#chomp! on page 1.

>chomp!:
>       Equivalent to $_.chomp!(aString). See String#chomp! 

>Am I missing something--I'm keen to make these reference
>pages as accurate as possible.

I was referring to the "See String#chomp!" on page 1.  Unless you remember
that you are ACTUALLY reading about Kernel#chomp and Kernel#chomp!
it is easy to get confused and think that the description of Kernel#chomp!
actually is String#chomp! - - see?

Thanks for all your hard work!  So when do we get to read it?



In This Thread

Prev Next