[#3109] Is divmod dangerous? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

14 messages 2000/06/06

[#3149] Retrieving the hostname and port in net/http — Roland Jesse <jesse@...>

Hi,

12 messages 2000/06/07

[#3222] Ruby coding standard? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

16 messages 2000/06/09

[#3277] Re: BUG or something? — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> |I am new to Ruby and this brings up a question I have had

17 messages 2000/06/12
[#3281] Re: BUG or something? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/06/12

Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com> writes:

[#3296] RE: about documentation — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> I want to contribute to the ruby project in my spare time.

15 messages 2000/06/12

[#3407] Waffling between Python and Ruby — "Warren Postma" <embed@...>

I was looking at the Ruby editor/IDE for windows and was disappointed with

19 messages 2000/06/14

[#3410] Exercice: Translate into Ruby :-) — Jilani Khaldi <jilanik@...>

Hi All,

17 messages 2000/06/14

[#3415] Re: Waffling between Python and Ruby — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

>Static typing..., hmm,...

11 messages 2000/06/14

[#3453] Re: Static Typing( Was: Waffling between Python and Ruby) — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

32 messages 2000/06/16

[#3516] Deep copy? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

Given that I cannot overload =, how should I go about ensuring a deep

20 messages 2000/06/19

[#3694] Why it's quiet — hal9000@...

We are all busy learning the new language

26 messages 2000/06/29
[#3703] Re: Why it's quiet — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2000/06/30

Hi,

[#3705] Re: Why it's quiet — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/06/30

Hi,

[ruby-talk:03507] Re: Python 3000 -> No, but there's 'R***'

From: Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>
Date: 2000-06-18 18:11:49 UTC
List: ruby-talk #3507
Aahz:
> While the content of those posts wasn't 
> particularly objectionable, the Subject sets the tone 
> and you'd better expect that people will react.

I appreciate a lot what Conrad has been doing but I have to say the subject
Aahz pointed is very important too. I hope Ruby community wont get it's
reputation for flaming, trashing or any electric warfare. It hasn't happen
so far and I surely hope we make our best efforts to reduce risks for these
unfortunate events in the future. I know Ruby is good enough to get
supporters and users without any boasting or touting.

Anyway, as I said, Aahz discussion had some ground. He said the content for
the posts has been ok but felt the subject raised his temper. And I have to
agree. I've got those 'what are these guys touting around' feelings too
especially before I started to count myself to be part of the community. I
believe I've got over those comments and just skip them but we're carrying
them with us still. For one example, I think the line 'Ruby is better XX
than XX.' is quite odd, not well worded and definitely most of the time
plain wrong. The most common XX has been Perl and I have to say Ruby is
worse Perl than Perl -- while we can argue is even Perl enough Perl :). But
I'm very glad Ruby is worse Perl than Perl. That's why I'm using it more
than Perl nowadays.

When I started to use Perl I amazed my pals many times with it's compact
power, even more with it's inherit 'if you touch a character of my code it
wont work'. With Ruby I *hope* I won't meet the latter ever again.

Ruby is a good language for beginners, but I think most of the short term
forecoming Ruby users will be "converts" having some earlier experience with
coding, languages and netiquette. So I'd say we have hope. But I'm sure we
won't get to the point where we could hear conversation like the following
example, because there will always be people who can't keep themselves calm,
and we start to get reputation...

"Why don't you use Ruby for that?"
"What's that, haven't heard of it?"
"Well, Ruby's a very nice language, fitting for your task at hand perfectly
and if you haven't heard of it, it's because there's no touting evangelists
around. Growing number of people know it anyway."
"Gee, thanks. Have to check that one. So how do you know about it?"
"I read a comparison how this feature X should be implemented in Y. There
were comments for other mainstream languages like C, Perl, Java and Python.
One dude then made a point how Ruby had already implemented feature Z, which
is working well and it's a little bit what we need. So I studied the
language, which was piece of cake, because Ruby is easy, simple and well
designed and started to use..."
"How come you're not using it all the time?"
"..but I'm not using it at my job because my employee is currently paying me
for completing our solution in Y. Well, Ruby is just another language,
albeit good one. It's another versatile tool in my toolbox. Our Solution
v.3.0 might have embedded Ruby though. Anyway, Ruby is quite mainstream
nowadays, so you can expect all your computer related pals know it after few
years. At least ones reading comp.lang.* :)"

	- Aleksi

In This Thread

Prev Next