[#3109] Is divmod dangerous? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

14 messages 2000/06/06

[#3149] Retrieving the hostname and port in net/http — Roland Jesse <jesse@...>

Hi,

12 messages 2000/06/07

[#3222] Ruby coding standard? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

16 messages 2000/06/09

[#3277] Re: BUG or something? — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> |I am new to Ruby and this brings up a question I have had

17 messages 2000/06/12
[#3281] Re: BUG or something? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/06/12

Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com> writes:

[#3296] RE: about documentation — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> I want to contribute to the ruby project in my spare time.

15 messages 2000/06/12

[#3407] Waffling between Python and Ruby — "Warren Postma" <embed@...>

I was looking at the Ruby editor/IDE for windows and was disappointed with

19 messages 2000/06/14

[#3410] Exercice: Translate into Ruby :-) — Jilani Khaldi <jilanik@...>

Hi All,

17 messages 2000/06/14

[#3415] Re: Waffling between Python and Ruby — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

>Static typing..., hmm,...

11 messages 2000/06/14

[#3453] Re: Static Typing( Was: Waffling between Python and Ruby) — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

32 messages 2000/06/16

[#3516] Deep copy? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

Given that I cannot overload =, how should I go about ensuring a deep

20 messages 2000/06/19

[#3694] Why it's quiet — hal9000@...

We are all busy learning the new language

26 messages 2000/06/29
[#3703] Re: Why it's quiet — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2000/06/30

Hi,

[#3705] Re: Why it's quiet — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/06/30

Hi,

[ruby-talk:03240] Re: BUG or something?

From: "Park Hee Sob" <phasis@...>
Date: 2000-06-10 05:19:54 UTC
List: ruby-talk #3240
Hi,

>
> the bottom line: if you are to *ever* use $=, do it at the very beginning
> of the program, or don't do it. my guess for $= is that it's going to
> become deprecated in Ruby version 2 or 3; it's one of that kind of
> features.
>

I just wanted temporary insensitive string comparison without any side
effect
like following and wished 'true'.

cfg = {"content-type" => "text/html","encoding"=>"base64"} # managed by
another library
...
$= = true
p cfg['content-type']=='TEXT/HTML' && cfg['encoding']=='BASE64'
$= = false

But It prints 'false'
so I have to code

p cfg['content-type']=~/TEXT\/HTML/i && cfg['encoding']=~/BASE64/i

Or

a = cfg['content-type']
b = cfg['encoding']
$= = true
p a == 'TEXT/HTML' && b=='BASE64'
$= = false

Or

p (cfg['content-type'] && cfg['content-type'].upcase=='TEXT/HTML')
  && (cfg['encoding'] && cfg['encoding'].upcase=='BASE64'

Something not neat and efficient code, isn't it?


>
> Mathieu Bouchard
>

Park HeeSob






In This Thread