[#3109] Is divmod dangerous? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

14 messages 2000/06/06

[#3149] Retrieving the hostname and port in net/http — Roland Jesse <jesse@...>

Hi,

12 messages 2000/06/07

[#3222] Ruby coding standard? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

16 messages 2000/06/09

[#3277] Re: BUG or something? — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> |I am new to Ruby and this brings up a question I have had

17 messages 2000/06/12
[#3281] Re: BUG or something? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/06/12

Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@cinnober.com> writes:

[#3296] RE: about documentation — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> I want to contribute to the ruby project in my spare time.

15 messages 2000/06/12

[#3407] Waffling between Python and Ruby — "Warren Postma" <embed@...>

I was looking at the Ruby editor/IDE for windows and was disappointed with

19 messages 2000/06/14

[#3410] Exercice: Translate into Ruby :-) — Jilani Khaldi <jilanik@...>

Hi All,

17 messages 2000/06/14

[#3415] Re: Waffling between Python and Ruby — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

>Static typing..., hmm,...

11 messages 2000/06/14

[#3453] Re: Static Typing( Was: Waffling between Python and Ruby) — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

32 messages 2000/06/16

[#3516] Deep copy? — Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng <hgs@...>

Given that I cannot overload =, how should I go about ensuring a deep

20 messages 2000/06/19

[#3694] Why it's quiet — hal9000@...

We are all busy learning the new language

26 messages 2000/06/29
[#3703] Re: Why it's quiet — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nahi@...> 2000/06/30

Hi,

[#3705] Re: Why it's quiet — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/06/30

Hi,

[ruby-talk:03133] Re: Is divmod dangerous?

From: Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
Date: 2000-06-06 17:42:24 UTC
List: ruby-talk #3133
gotoken@math.sci.hokudai.ac.jp (GOTO Kentaro) writes:

> In message "[ruby-talk:03125] Re: Is divmod dangerous?"
>     on 00/06/06, Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> writes:

> >It seems as if changing division so that 13/-4 -> -4 is a popular
> >option, perhaps keeping the current behavior as a new method. a%b
> >would then become a synonym for a.remainder(b).
> 
> But, I don't feel that Ruby's operators is not necessary to change; 
> their definitions are well reasonable.  

I guess it might just be me that was surprised to find that

    q, r = divmod(x, y)  =/=>  x = q*y + r

(where =/=> is a lame attempt at "does not imply"). In an ongoing
attempt to minimize the surprise function, I thought I'd raise the
issue.

However, if folks feel that this is the way it should be, that's fine
by me--I'll just document it that way.


Regards


Dave

In This Thread