[#326447] Python to Ruby Tutorial (need collborators) — r <rt8396@...>

Hello all,

20 messages 2009/02/01

[#326520] Minor 1.8 <-> 1.9 performance comparison gotcha — Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@...>

Excited and inspired by the Ruby 1.9.1 release, I wrote a blog post

10 messages 2009/02/02

[#326548] Quicker finding strings? Alternative for array, hash, set? — Patrick Put <patrick.put@...>

I've been searching for this information already, but cannot really find

10 messages 2009/02/02

[#326553] Variable declarations on one line — Frisco Del rosario <friscodelrosario@...>

a="al", b="bob", c="carl"

11 messages 2009/02/02

[#326570] Native gem roundup! — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>

I'm curious what native gems/extensions people are typically using. In

40 messages 2009/02/02
[#326654] Re: Native gem roundup! — Tom Cloyd <tomcloyd@...> 2009/02/02

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#326607] How to tell if one is running 32 or 64 bit Ruby on Mac OS X? — Wes Gamble <weyus@...>

All,

14 messages 2009/02/02

[#326646] Hash counting — Stuart Clarke <stuart.clarke1986@...>

I am trying to load some data into a hash and then count how many times

22 messages 2009/02/02
[#326655] Re: Hash counting — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2009/02/02

On 02.02.2009 21:43, Stuart Clarke wrote:

[#326665] Re: Hash counting — Stuart Clarke <stuart.clarke1986@...> 2009/02/02

Thanks Robert.

[#326669] Re: Hash counting — Stuart Clarke <stuart.clarke1986@...> 2009/02/02

I have worked out the problem but I am a little unsure how to solve it.

[#326717] Re: Hash counting — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2009/02/03

2009/2/3 Stuart Clarke <stuart.clarke1986@gmail.com>:

[#326756] Re: Hash counting — Stuart Clarke <stuart.clarke1986@...> 2009/02/03

Thanks for replying and sorry for the confusion.

[#326758] Re: Hash counting — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2009/02/03

2009/2/3 Stuart Clarke <stuart.clarke1986@gmail.com>:

[#326762] Re: Hash counting — Stuart Clarke <stuart.clarke1986@...> 2009/02/03

Ok I will get straight to the code causing the problem, so first off you

[#326680] Is there an 'offical' Ruby binary for Windows? — Heesob Park <phasis@...>

I know that there are at least three Ruby Windows distributions.

12 messages 2009/02/03

[#326703] A Tk window — Albert Schlef <albertschlef@...>

I have a program that run in the terminal. But once in a while I need it

22 messages 2009/02/03

[#326761] 1.9.1? — yuckysocks <alex.m.mcpherson@...>

Hi there,

26 messages 2009/02/03

[#326858] Using a Class (not an instance) into threads — Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@...>

Hi, i'm using Ragel parser generating Ruby code. The generated code

19 messages 2009/02/04

[#326897] Making object methods available externally — David Stanford <dthomas53@...>

Hi all,

14 messages 2009/02/04

[#326953] a simple command that splits up a string into numbers and letters — shawn bright <nephish@...>

Hey all,

10 messages 2009/02/05

[#326957] Watir is acting retarded — Daniel Waite <rabbitblue@...>

This...

13 messages 2009/02/05

[#327048] Full Ruport Book manuscripts now on Github — Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@...>

Hi folks,

14 messages 2009/02/05
[#327088] Re: [ANN] Full Ruport Book manuscripts now on Github — Robert Dober <robert.dober@...> 2009/02/06

On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Gregory Brown

[#327103] Re: [ANN] Full Ruport Book manuscripts now on Github — Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@...> 2009/02/06

On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 6:08 AM, Robert Dober <robert.dober@gmail.com> wrote:

[#327171] Re: [ANN] Full Ruport Book manuscripts now on Github — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...> 2009/02/06

On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@gmail.com>wrote:

[#327172] Re: [ANN] Full Ruport Book manuscripts now on Github — Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@...> 2009/02/06

On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@gmail.com> wrote:

[#327060] Method Precedence — Daly <aeldaly@...>

Hello all,

15 messages 2009/02/06

[#327126] Mathematical Image Generator (#191) — Daniel Moore <yahivin@...>

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

11 messages 2009/02/06

[#327129] Special Hash Constructors — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...>

15 messages 2009/02/06

[#327146] eval statement — Jonathan Wills <runningwild@...>

Trying to switch a project of mine from python to ruby. Love ruby so

26 messages 2009/02/06

[#327215] Module#=== vs Object#is_a? — Peter Fitzgibbons <peter.fitzgibbons@...>

HI All,

14 messages 2009/02/07

[#327223] cannot remove multiple spaces — Tom Cloyd <tomcloyd@...>

I'm baffled by this strange outcome - I cannot reduce multiple spaces

16 messages 2009/02/07

[#327224] Ruby vs Perl performance — Vetrivel Vetrivel <vetrivel.bksys@...>

I have downloaded perl and ruby program in net.I run both the

77 messages 2009/02/07
[#327260] Re: Ruby vs Perl performance — Igor Pirnovar <gooigpi@...> 2009/02/07

Vetrivel Vetrivel wrote:

[#327393] Re: Ruby vs Perl performance — Chad Perrin <perrin@...> 2009/02/09

On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 03:22:20AM +0900, Igor Pirnovar wrote:

[#327444] Re: Ruby vs Perl performance — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2009/02/09

Chad, I generally agree, however...

[#327471] Re: Ruby vs Perl performance — David Masover <ninja@...> 2009/02/09

Robert Klemme wrote:

[#327483] Re: Ruby vs Perl performance — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2009/02/09

On 09.02.2009 19:15, David Masover wrote:

[#327489] Re: Ruby vs Perl performance — David Masover <ninja@...> 2009/02/09

Robert Klemme wrote:

[#327564] Re: Ruby vs Perl performance — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2009/02/10

2009/2/9 David Masover <ninja@slaphack.com>:

[#327573] Re: Ruby vs Perl performance — David Masover <ninja@...> 2009/02/10

Robert Klemme wrote:

[#327306] ruby interpreter written in ruby.. — Eelco <catsquotl@...>

Hi there,

13 messages 2009/02/08

[#327332] calling random — Boris Schmid <borisschmid@...>

Apologies, I have been out of using ruby for a while, and ran into

12 messages 2009/02/08

[#327346] best way to protect class instance variables — Barun Singh <barunio@...>

Suppose I generate a class instance variable and create an accessor

10 messages 2009/02/08

[#327403] Ruby file to Executable file -- for all OS — jazzez ravi <jazzezravi@...>

Hi All,

13 messages 2009/02/09
[#327521] Re: Ruby file to Executable file -- for all OS — jazzez ravi <jazzezravi@...> 2009/02/10

[#327525] Re: Ruby file to Executable file -- for all OS — David Masover <ninja@...> 2009/02/10

jazzez ravi wrote:

[#327419] Which is the best development environment? Windows Vs Linux — priyankeshu <priyankeshu.parihar@...>

I just started learnign Rails and i think it's quite cool! I have just

14 messages 2009/02/09

[#327434] regexp problem — Joao Silva <rubyforum@...>

how i can extract:

21 messages 2009/02/09

[#327492] Got SystemStackError exception: stack level too deep — Bezan Kapadia <bezan99@...>

I have master Process that is forking 2 child processes in the

16 messages 2009/02/09
[#327494] Re: Got SystemStackError exception: stack level too deep — Tony Arcieri <tony@...> 2009/02/09

On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Bezan Kapadia <bezan99@gmail.com> wrote:

[#327498] Re: Got SystemStackError exception: stack level too deep — Bezan Kapadia <bezan99@...> 2009/02/10

I see ...

[#327510] Ruby GUI Survey: Results — Alex Fenton <alex@...>

The results of the survey of Ruby GUI programming carried out at the end

13 messages 2009/02/10

[#327522] a better way to do this job? — Zhenning Guan <g.zhen.ning@...>

topics.each do |f|

34 messages 2009/02/10
[#327532] Re: a better way to do this job? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2009/02/10

[#327542] Re: a better way to do this job? — Julian Leviston <julian@...> 2009/02/10

First doesn't take an argument I'm ruby. It does

[#327560] Float in Spreadsheet — Jim Burgess <igsnhelp@...>

Hi,

15 messages 2009/02/10
[#327852] Re: Float in Spreadsheet — Jim Burgess <igsnhelp@...> 2009/02/12

Can no one help me?

[#327610] how to do the recursion — Li Chen <chen_li3@...>

Hi all,

14 messages 2009/02/11

[#327704] If you are unhappy with the direction of Ruby 1.8.7+, respond — Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@...>

I am setting up two threads in the hopes that we can see names

188 messages 2009/02/11
[#327721] Re: If you are unhappy with the direction of Ruby 1.8.7+, respond — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <zznmeb@...> 2009/02/11

I've posted my opinions on Ruby-Core, but I'll summarize them here:

[#327756] Re: If you are unhappy with the direction of Ruby 1.8.7+, respond — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...> 2009/02/11

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Gregory Brown

[#327769] Re: If you are unhappy with the direction of Ruby 1.8.7+, respond — Pit Capitain <pit.capitain@...> 2009/02/11

2009/2/11 Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@gmail.com>:

[#327774] Re: If you are unhappy with the direction of Ruby 1.8.7+, respond — James Gray <james@...> 2009/02/11

On Feb 11, 2009, at 3:42 PM, Pit Capitain wrote:

[#327892] Re: If you are unhappy with the direction of Ruby 1.8.7+, respond — Stefan Lang <perfectly.normal.hacker@...> 2009/02/12

2009/2/11 James Gray <james@grayproductions.net>:

[#327897] Re: If you are unhappy with the direction of Ruby 1.8.7+, respond — James Coglan <jcoglan@...> 2009/02/12

>

[#327901] Re: If you are unhappy with the direction of Ruby 1.8.7+, respond — Stefan Lang <perfectly.normal.hacker@...> 2009/02/12

2009/2/12 James Coglan <jcoglan@googlemail.com>:

[#327905] Re: If you are unhappy with the direction of Ruby 1.8.7+, respond — James Coglan <jcoglan@...> 2009/02/12

>

[#327910] Re: If you are unhappy with the direction of Ruby 1.8.7+, respond — Stefan Lang <perfectly.normal.hacker@...> 2009/02/12

2009/2/12 James Coglan <jcoglan@googlemail.com>:

[#327914] Re: If you are unhappy with the direction of Ruby 1.8.7+, respond — Ezra Zygmuntowicz <ezmobius@...> 2009/02/12

[#327918] Re: If you are unhappy with the direction of Ruby 1.8.7+, respond — Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@...> 2009/02/12

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Ezra Zygmuntowicz <ezmobius@gmail.com> wrote:

[#327954] Re: If you are unhappy with the direction of Ruby 1.8.7+, respond — Pit Capitain <pit.capitain@...> 2009/02/12

2009/2/12 Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@gmail.com>:

[#327957] Re: If you are unhappy with the direction of Ruby 1.8.7+, respond — Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@...> 2009/02/12

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Pit Capitain <pit.capitain@gmail.com> wrote:

[#327919] Re: If you are unhappy with the direction of Ruby 1.8.7+, respond — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...> 2009/02/12

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Ezra Zygmuntowicz <ezmobius@gmail.com>wrote:

[#328043] Re: If you are unhappy with the direction of Ruby 1.8.7+, respond — "William James" <w_a_x_man@...> 2009/02/13

James Coglan wrote:

[#328073] Re: If you are unhappy with the direction of Ruby 1.8.7+, respond — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...> 2009/02/13

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 4:53 AM, William James <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> wrote:

[#328076] Re: If you are unhappy with the direction of Ruby 1.8.7+, respond — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2009/02/13

Hi --

[#328079] Re: If you are unhappy with the direction of Ruby 1.8.7+, respond — James Coglan <jcoglan@...> 2009/02/13

2009/2/13 David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com>

[#328082] Re: If you are unhappy with the direction of Ruby 1.8.7+, respond — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2009/02/13

Hi --

[#328084] Re: If you are unhappy with the direction of Ruby 1.8.7+, respond — James Coglan <jcoglan@...> 2009/02/13

>

[#327705] If you are happy with the direction of Ruby 1.8.7+, respond — Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@...>

I am setting up two threads in the hopes that we can see names

31 messages 2009/02/11

[#327754] Array uniq — Stuart Little <stuart_clarke1986@...>

I am having some troubles with the uniq method for arrays. This is a

18 messages 2009/02/11

[#328065] Meaning of "<<"? — Chris Davies <chris-usenet@...>

Hi,

15 messages 2009/02/13

[#328140] Good GUI documentation — Ruby Student <ruby.student@...>

Hello all you happy GUIsher!

27 messages 2009/02/13

[#328261] Multidimensional hash - get all not blank keys — "Michael .." <xinu@...>

Hello.

13 messages 2009/02/15

[#328279] Iterating a changing Hash under 1.9.1 — Phrogz <phrogz@...>

The following code shows that Hash#each under 1.9.1p0 does not iterate

18 messages 2009/02/15

[#328320] invalid byte sequence in US-ASCII (ArgumentError) — Luther <lutheroto@...>

I'm having some trouble migrating from 1.8 to 1.9.1. I have this line of

20 messages 2009/02/16
[#328321] Re: invalid byte sequence in US-ASCII (ArgumentError) — Tim Hunter <TimHunter@...> 2009/02/16

Luther wrote:

[#328333] Re: invalid byte sequence in US-ASCII (ArgumentError) — Luther <lutheroto@...> 2009/02/16

On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 09:19 +0900, Tim Hunter wrote:

[#328349] Re: invalid byte sequence in US-ASCII (ArgumentError) — Tom Link <micathom@...> 2009/02/16

> but now I know my program will puke

[#328323] ffi-ncurses version 0.3.0 — "Sean O'Halpin" <sean.ohalpin@...>

ffi-ncurses version 0.3.0

10 messages 2009/02/16

[#328338] vim for ruby — Bharat Ruparel <bcruparel@...>

I am using Ubuntu 7.10. I installed vim-ruby package to get the ruby

19 messages 2009/02/16
[#328397] Re: vim for ruby — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...> 2009/02/16

Hi,

[#328345] What are your favorite Ruby features? — Tony Arcieri <tony@...>

I'm creating a new language which borrows heavily from Ruby, and I'm curious

71 messages 2009/02/16
[#328379] Re: What are your favorite Ruby features? — Robert Dober <robert.dober@...> 2009/02/16

On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 5:26 AM, Tony Arcieri <tony@medioh.com> wrote:

[#328382] Re: What are your favorite Ruby features? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2009/02/16

Hi --

[#328395] Re: What are your favorite Ruby features? — Robert Dober <robert.dober@...> 2009/02/16

On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:36 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote=

[#328400] Re: What are your favorite Ruby features? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2009/02/16
[#328419] Re: What are your favorite Ruby features? — Robert Dober <robert.dober@...> 2009/02/16

On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 2:13 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:

[#328452] Re: What are your favorite Ruby features? — Brian Candler <b.candler@...> 2009/02/16

Tony Arcieri wrote:

[#328473] Re: What are your favorite Ruby features? — Tony Arcieri <tony@...> 2009/02/17

On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Brian Candler <b.candler@pobox.com> wrote:

[#328498] Re: What are your favorite Ruby features? — David Masover <ninja@...> 2009/02/17

Tony Arcieri wrote:

[#328523] Re: What are your favorite Ruby features? — Juan Zanos <juan_zanos@...> 2009/02/17

[#328532] Re: What are your favorite Ruby features? — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...> 2009/02/17

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Juan Zanos <juan_zanos@talkhouse.com>wrote=

[#328541] Re: What are your favorite Ruby features? — David Masover <ninja@...> 2009/02/17

Rick DeNatale wrote:

[#328596] Re: What are your favorite Ruby features? — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...> 2009/02/18

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 2:40 PM, David Masover <ninja@slaphack.com> wrote:

[#328600] Re: What are your favorite Ruby features? — Robert Dober <robert.dober@...> 2009/02/18

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@gmail.com> wrote:

[#328373] How to do this complicated logic in ruby — Valentino Lun <sumwo@...>

Dear all

10 messages 2009/02/16

[#328560] Tree structure - how do we link nodes together? — Aldric Giacomoni <"aldric[removeme]"@...>

I know I could just use rubytree, which looks quite nice, but I'd like

19 messages 2009/02/18

[#328702] literal syntax for array of arrays of strings — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>

17 messages 2009/02/19

[#328775] How to do conditional compile for Ruby 1.9 in a C extension? — Jason Garber <jg@...>

I'm working on updating RedCloth for Ruby 1.9. Since the output of

14 messages 2009/02/19

[#328808] How does one generate a "main page" for rdoc documentation? — Kenneth McDonald <kenneth.m.mcdonald@...>

I tried

21 messages 2009/02/19
[#328814] Re: How does one generate a "main page" for rdoc documentation? — Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...> 2009/02/19

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Kenneth McDonald <

[#328815] Re: How does one generate a "main page" for rdoc documentation? — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2009/02/19

Rick DeNatale wrote:

[#328817] Re: How does one generate a "main page" for rdoc documentation? — Igor Pirnovar <gooigpi@...> 2009/02/19

Where did you get the syntax for your:

[#328825] Re: How does one generate a "main page" for rdoc documentation? — James Britt <james.britt@...> 2009/02/20

Igor Pirnovar wrote:

[#328833] Re: How does one generate a "main page" for rdoc documentation? — Tom Link <micathom@...> 2009/02/20

> > | rdoc --main maindocpage rex.rb |

[#328840] Re: How does one generate a "main page" for rdoc documentation? — James Britt <james.britt@...> 2009/02/20

Tom Link wrote:

[#328902] what Ruby version to use on Windows for a 1.2.x RoR app? — neongrau __ <neongrau@...>

hi there!

20 messages 2009/02/20
[#328947] Re: what Ruby version to use on Windows for a 1.2.x RoR app? — Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@...> 2009/02/21

> isn't there any memory stable ruby version for windows?

[#329156] Re: what Ruby version to use on Windows for a 1.2.x RoR app? — neongrau __ <neongrau@...> 2009/02/23

Roger Pack wrote:

[#329172] Re: what Ruby version to use on Windows for a 1.2.x RoR app? — Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@...> 2009/02/23

[#329275] Re: what Ruby version to use on Windows for a 1.2.x RoR app? — neongrau __ <neongrau@...> 2009/02/24

Roger Pack wrote:

[#329530] Re: what Ruby version to use on Windows for a 1.2.x RoR app? — Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@...> 2009/02/25

neongrau __ wrote:

[#329592] Re: what Ruby version to use on Windows for a 1.2.x RoR app? — neongrau __ <neongrau@...> 2009/02/26

Roger Pack wrote:

[#329685] Re: what Ruby version to use on Windows for a 1.2.x RoR app? — Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@...> 2009/02/26

> and don't have any compiler on my XP vmware installation yet.

[#329801] Re: what Ruby version to use on Windows for a 1.2.x RoR app? — neongrau __ <neongrau@...> 2009/02/27

i have no experience with git, i just did this:

[#328967] encoding problem with tr() and hash keys — Do One <do1@...>

Please help to understand solution to this problem (ruby 1.9.1):

17 messages 2009/02/21
[#329141] Re: encoding problem with tr() and hash keys — Brian Candler <b.candler@...> 2009/02/23

Do One wrote:

[#328981] How to call a module method dynamically — Adrian Klingel <adrian.klingel@...>

I know about object instantiation and the send method, but the methods I

11 messages 2009/02/21

[#329029] Nexus Programming Language — Avatar <acampbellb@...>

A new object-oriented programming language has been unofficially

133 messages 2009/02/21
[#329048] Re: Nexus Programming Language — Ken Bloom <kbloom@...> 2009/02/22

On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 15:37:34 -0800, Avatar wrote:

[#329136] Re: Nexus Programming Language — Chad Perrin <perrin@...> 2009/02/23

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 01:09:34AM +0900, Ken Bloom wrote:

[#329138] Re: Nexus Programming Language — Eleanor McHugh <eleanor@...> 2009/02/23

On 23 Feb 2009, at 12:38, Chad Perrin wrote:

[#329177] Re: Nexus Programming Language — Chad Perrin <perrin@...> 2009/02/23

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 09:48:44PM +0900, Eleanor McHugh wrote:

[#329183] Re: Nexus Programming Language — Eleanor McHugh <eleanor@...> 2009/02/23

On 23 Feb 2009, at 19:47, Chad Perrin wrote:

[#329184] Re: Nexus Programming Language — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <zznmeb@...> 2009/02/23

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Eleanor McHugh

[#329218] Re: Nexus Programming Language — Avatar <acampbellb@...> 2009/02/24

On Feb 23, 3:21=A0pm, Eleanor McHugh <elea...@games-with-brains.com>

[#329297] Re: Nexus Programming Language — Tom Cloyd <tomcloyd@...> 2009/02/24

Avatar wrote:

[#329365] Re: Nexus Programming Language — Eleanor McHugh <eleanor@...> 2009/02/25

On 24 Feb 2009, at 13:44, Tom Cloyd wrote:

[#329317] Re: Nexus Programming Language — pjb@... (Pascal J. Bourguignon) 2009/02/24

Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@gmail.com> writes:

[#329067] Improving hexadecimal escaping performance — Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@...>

Hi, I've a module with two methods (thanks Jeff):

11 messages 2009/02/23

[#329179] pointer and other questions — Daniel Schoch <trash@...>

Hi,

16 messages 2009/02/23
[#329182] Re: pointer and other questions — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2009/02/23

On 23.02.2009 21:00, Daniel Schoch wrote:

[#329187] Re: pointer and other questions — Daniel Schoch <trash@...> 2009/02/23

>

[#329330] Can Ruby interact with the shell sh ? — Raimon Fs <coder@...>

Hello,

12 messages 2009/02/24

[#329332] error trying to install ruby gems 1.3.1 — 7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@...>

~/my_tar_extractions/rubygems-1.3.1$ sudo ruby setup.rb

12 messages 2009/02/24

[#329426] Where is splat implemented? / How does it work? — Mischa Fierer <f.mischa@...>

Hi --

12 messages 2009/02/25

[#329478] What is the Qur窶凖「n? — al albani <imanway123@...>

20 messages 2009/02/25

[#329532] Religious discussion — Julian Leviston <julian@...>

Hi all. I've thought quite a long time bout this, and I hope this is a

13 messages 2009/02/25
[#329657] Re: Religious discussion — Kyle Schmitt <kyleaschmitt@...> 2009/02/26

On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Julian Leviston <julian@coretech.net.au> wrote:

[#329554] Sample Chapter from "Ruby Best Practices" — Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@...>

== The short story

12 messages 2009/02/26

[#329671] Letter writing campaign to Jim — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>

"Rake version 0.8.4 has been released!" is what you would be reading if

16 messages 2009/02/26
[#329683] Re: [ANN] Letter writing campaign to Jim — Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@...> 2009/02/26

On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Aaron Patterson

[#329710] Re: [ANN] Letter writing campaign to Jim — Aaron Turner <synfinatic@...> 2009/02/26

On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Gregory Brown

[#329715] Re: [ANN] Letter writing campaign to Jim — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2009/02/26

On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 05:49:08AM +0900, Aaron Turner wrote:

[#329672] Any plans for a "OneClickInstaller for Ruby 1.9.1? — Ruby Student <ruby.student@...>

TWIMC,

10 messages 2009/02/26

[#329759] Setting the contents of a file to a variable? — Stefan Codrescu <fixxie.wits@...>

Ok so...

16 messages 2009/02/27
[#329766] Re: Setting the contents of a file to a variable? — Justin Collins <justincollins@...> 2009/02/27

Stefan Codrescu wrote:

[#330556] Re: Setting the contents of a file to a variable? — Stefan Codrescu <fixxie.wits@...> 2009/03/06

ok, thanks ill try that but i also found

[#330680] Re: Setting the contents of a file to a variable? — Brian Candler <b.candler@...> 2009/03/08

Stefan Codrescu wrote:

[#329804] How to find the specific row of CSV file. — Salil Gaikwad <salil@...>

I want to change or read only specific row of CSV file, i don't know how

18 messages 2009/02/27
[#329822] Re: How to find the specific row of CSV file. — James Gray <james@...> 2009/02/27

On Feb 27, 2009, at 8:19 AM, Salil Gaikwad wrote:

[#329883] Re: How to find the specific row of CSV file. — Salil Gaikwad <salil@...> 2009/02/28

My code is as follows

[#329905] Re: How to find the specific row of CSV file. — Craig Demyanovich <cdemyanovich@...> 2009/02/28

First, let's create a rough, high-level solution to your problem.

[#329985] Re: How to find the specific row of CSV file. — Salil Gaikwad <salil@...> 2009/03/01

thanx james & craig

[#329987] Re: How to find the specific row of CSV file. — Craig Demyanovich <cdemyanovich@...> 2009/03/01

On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Salil Gaikwad <salil@cipher-tech.com> wrote:

[#329990] Re: How to find the specific row of CSV file. — Salil Gaikwad <salil@...> 2009/03/01

thanx for quick reply

[#329871] Marshal.load does not create new instances? — Ian Trudel <ian.trudel@...>

Marshal does not seem to instantiate given class(es) on load. Moreover,

18 messages 2009/02/27
[#329875] Re: Marshal.load does not create new instances? — 7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@...> 2009/02/28

Ian Trudel wrote:

[#329878] Re: Marshal.load does not create new instances? — Ian Trudel <ian.trudel@...> 2009/02/28

7stud -- wrote:

[#329900] Re: Marshal.load does not create new instances? — Pit Capitain <pit.capitain@...> 2009/02/28

2009/2/28 Ian Trudel <ian.trudel@gmail.com>:

[#329907] Re: Marshal.load does not create new instances? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2009/02/28

2009/2/28 Pit Capitain <pit.capitain@gmail.com>:

[#329896] Hi..About Gsoc 2009 project ideas... — usw wickramasinghe <mastershield2007@...>

Hi,

15 messages 2009/02/28

[#329909] How to put multiple values into a variable. — Harry Nash <hjnash@...>

I am new to coding, I have tried to place a number of data strings into

11 messages 2009/02/28

[#329942] Priorities for JRuby 1.3 — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>

With JRuby 1.2 almost out the door, we should talk a bit about where to

17 messages 2009/02/28

Re: Ruby vs Perl performance

From: Igor Pirnovar <gooigpi@...>
Date: 2009-02-15 20:14:11 UTC
List: ruby-talk #328300
Chad Perrin wrote:
David Masover wrote:
> Oh, you mean you've actually defined things like 
> (nil.nil? == false)? That's not very smart.

Indeed, any logical premise is possibe until proven wrong. There are 
domains in which true == false, or 2+2=5 for that matter. They are yust 
not the domains you usualy work in. Your writing shows limited 
flexibility and rigidity that are the thing of the past.

>> Logically in OOM the term loosely means "the opposite".

> I have never heard it used to mean that, in computer science or 
otherwise.

Of course not - this is not hard to guess from your anything but 
enlightening arguments. The keyword in my definition of the term 
orthogonal is "loosely", which you missed despite including it in the 
quote. For OO and procedural programming the orthogonality comes to mind 
due to the fact that the first deals with vertical pyramid - structured 
organizations, while the other with flat object organizations.  It is 
not so much that these two are opposite, but they definitely are 
perpendicular to each other. The fact that each of these two 
organizations in their respective domains employ orthogonal operations 
makes them loosely opposite. Of course if you have trouble seeing what's 
orthogonal, you are at a loss here. If you would ever open Grady Booch's 
OOA/D or Ivar Jacobson's OO Software Engineering you would see countless 
occurrences of this term. In fact one of the first things you ever learn 
in Booch is about the orthogonality of the class and object structure, 
whereby each complex system can be viewed as both a class structure and 
as an orthogonal to it object structure.  Class exhibits a "is-a" 
relationship property while object structure its orthogonal or opposite 
"has-a" relationship. On the other hand Jacobson's analysis model is 
based on there dimensional space defined by three mutually orthogonal 
entities: behaviour, presentation, and information (data) ... Needless 
to say that the two OOM models were accepted by every other computer 
scientist and they subsequently use the term in question throughout 
their work. You really do not have to advertise your ignorance ;)



Chad Perrin wrote:
> Actually, he was probably misled by the fact that you keep 
> using the "fact" that Perl is a "procedural language" as a 
> means of attacking it, and holding up Ruby's OO-ness as 
> proof of its superiority, then follow that up by holding 
> up Booch as the standard of all that is good and right
> in the world of programming technique.

Indeed, Perl is a procedural language, and the OO is only its extension. 
You either did not read my posts or perhaps you want to ignore all the 
arguments that explain how OO is a bonus in Perl, and that it is far too 
much trouble to use. The true Perl power is in it's procedural features, 
and its OO extension spells trouble for every project that reaches the 
entry level complexity if managed by Ruby. It may appear that I have 
been too negative about Perl, but that is not really how I feel about 
it, namely, I love Perl but not for its OO features but for what it 
really is - and that undoubtedly is one of the pearls between the 
procedural languages. Hey, C can also be used as a language in OO 
environment thanks to its GNOME extension, and I can argue that C/GNOME 
combination is much more powerful than Perl's OO extension!
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

In This Thread