From: Chad Perrin <perrin@...>
Date: 2009-02-25T04:41:12+09:00
Subject: Re: Nexus Programming Language

--xo44VMWPx7vlQ2+2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 04:05:18PM +0900, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
>=20
> Having learned Lisp as Lisp 1.5, I'm much more inclined to Scheme than
> Common Lisp, because Scheme fixed a lot of the warts on Lisp 1.5.

I've never really gotten past the initial playing-around stage with
either of them, but from my *very* scant experience, and from what I know
of the two languages indirectly, I'm more inclined toward Scheme as well.

I still don't think the previous comments were very productive, though,
and they really didn't need to be said in that context.

--=20
Chad Perrin [ content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
Quoth Sterling Camden: "The Church doesn't want people calling for
inquisitions."

--xo44VMWPx7vlQ2+2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkmkTP8ACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKWdiACg4n0NgxZj9IDl01/1oZMw7zKc
LvYAoIvKato+T8tJDevVAMop8+Nuq03D
=LPin
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--xo44VMWPx7vlQ2+2--