From: Roger Pack Date: 2009-02-22T02:37:09+09:00 Subject: Re: why not check for nil? matt neuburg wrote: > A post I ran across on a rails forum reads: > > "Warning! DO NOT test for nil! This is a very bad coding practice. You > can use "if obj", but do not use "if obj.nil?" or whatever." > > Is that generally true? Why? m. because it might be false [not nil]? -=r -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.