From: Chad Perrin <perrin@...>
Date: 2009-02-12T05:19:47+09:00
Subject: Re: Ruby GUI Survey: Results

--+ts6NCQ4mrNQIV8p
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 08:48:51AM +0900, Alex Fenton wrote:
> Mark Roseman wrote:
>=20
> >Ruby/Tk already comes with both the 'classic' and the 'themed' widget=20
> >sets out of the box, with nothing at all extra to install.  The catch,=
=20
> >and it's no small one, is that the two widget sets have slightly=20
> >different API's in places. =20
>=20
> Thanks for the explanation. To summarise: the ruby standard library=20
> says: "We give you Tk widgets; they look like shit. Maybe you knows=20
> secret codez for handsome widgets?!?!"

There are a lot of shortcomings in documentation for Ruby libraries, I've
noticed.  This appears to be just another example of that -- and not
specific to Tk.

--=20
Chad Perrin [ content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
Mike Maples, as quoted by James Gleick:  "My job is to get a fair share
of the software applications market, and to me that's 100 percent."

--+ts6NCQ4mrNQIV8p
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkmTMrwACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKUNOgCg2Rho/Vn5UnZguEzEofwnVsUs
dzEAn3wZFzpYn3qh3wJHIyeyQaSTmFqe
=3UWI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--+ts6NCQ4mrNQIV8p--