From: Phlip <phlip2005@...>
Date: 2009-02-05T12:54:33+09:00
Subject: Re: custom assertion message for unit tests

Will Parsons wrote:

> Yes, because I want also to check for being read-only in addition to being
> executable in the file permissions.

If I felt the request to take the "" off of "0775" sounded a little petty, this 
would probably be on account of I'm disturbed by so much effort to achieve 0775 
when "File(...).readonly? == true" is a little bit more readable!

How about assert{ `ls -l #{filename.inspect}` =~ /-rwxr-wr-w/ } ?