From: Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
Date: 2009-02-26T04:30:47+09:00
Subject: Re: ask ri for the other squeeze

On Feb 21, 2009, at 10:10, matt neuburg wrote:

>> but I prefer fastri over ri, because....it's *faster*
>
> Faster, but long ago broken OMM. It stopped working one day (after a
> rdoc update, I think) and just never worked again. It doesn't look  
> very
> supported and I assume it is no longer maintained...?

RDoc 2 has a fast ri, from cache:

$ time ri String#squeeze > /dev/null

real	0m0.398s
user	0m0.339s
sys	0m0.054s