From: "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <zznmeb@...>
Date: 2009-02-24T16:05:18+09:00
Subject: Re: Nexus Programming Language

> I . . . don't think that's really productive at all.  Common Lisp still
> has its advantages as a language, even if it's not the LISP many people
> wish it could be.

Having learned Lisp as Lisp 1.5, I'm much more inclined to Scheme than
Common Lisp, because Scheme fixed a lot of the warts on Lisp 1.5.
-- 
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
http://www.linkedin.com/in/edborasky

I've never met a happy clam. In fact, most of them were pretty steamed.