From: Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Date: 2009-02-11T05:08:38+09:00
Subject: Re: a better way to do this job?


On Feb 10, 2009, at 03:37 , 7stud -- wrote:

> In my opinion, it's nicer than the first version because it doesn't  
> have
> to create a sub array in memory, like all the solutions posted so far
> do, which could be a problem with large arrays and large slices.

mentarbation.

it isn't a problem until it is a problem.