From: dustin b Date: 2009-02-27T07:27:13+09:00 Subject: Re: Religious discussion --00163630e99f6136be0463d9ddd1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 05:37:54AM +0900, pat eyler wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Chad Perrin > wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 02:22:39AM +0900, pat eyler wrote: > > >> > > >> emacs vs vi(m)? > > > > > > Only the emacs side is religious: > > > > > > http://www.dina.kvl.dk/~abraham/religion/ > > > > > > The vi side is a gang: > > > > > > http://www.homebrew.net/visign/ > > > > > > /me throws the vi gang sign. > > > > and I know that someday you'll repent. > > I'm editor-agnostic. Well, technically, I guess I'm more of an > editor-taoist. Editaoist? Anyway, the upshot is that I can see how your > religious interpretation is a valid perspective on reality, even if it is > kind of limited. > > After all, emacs is a halfway decent OS. Some people claim it lacks a > decent editor, but I disagree -- Viper is an excellent editor. > > What it *does* lack is a decent bootloader. > > -- > Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] > Quoth Anonymous: "Blind faith is an ironic gift to return to the Creator > of human intelligence." > I always thought Pico was a great editor. Also "Git sucks" ...please don't hurt me!! ( http://www.netsplit.com/2009/02/17/git-sucks/) --00163630e99f6136be0463d9ddd1--