From: Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>
Date: 2009-02-26T04:17:22+09:00
Subject: Re: [ANN] rdoc 2.4.0 Released

Eric Hodel wrote:
> Would adding a :attr: directive be an acceptable alternative?  This 
> would allow the documentation to be rendered as intended without a 
> command line flag.

The effect of the :attr: directive would be that any invocation of the 
specified class method was to be treated as an attr? Could a tag ("R" 
etc.) be specified along with the class method? And would the new rdoc 
still automatically recognize "attr_*" as attrs, without the explicit 
directive? Sounds great to me, but it would be good to hear from more 
library maintainers.

-- 
       vjoel : Joel VanderWerf : path berkeley edu : 510 665 3407