From: Paul w Florczykowski <pwf@...>
Date: 2009-02-04T03:03:45+09:00
Subject: Re: Continuations

Patrick Roemer wrote:
> ...
> So you don't need to 'update' your continuation references in order to
> keep track of changed state (such as the num value inside loller). The
> reason you require the assignment to 'that' is because on the initial
> method invocation it will have the 'wrong' value - it will transfer back
> to #A, and you have to fix that after the first control transfer back
> into loller via 'well' to point to #B instead. (Which is also why you
> get two successive messages from loller before the root messages kick 
> in.)
> ...
> Best regards,
> Patrick

Appreciate the reply! it actually helped me understand this! Thanks 
again!
-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.