From: Robert Klemme Date: 2009-02-26T17:21:11+09:00 Subject: Re: Nexus Programming Language 2009/2/26 Eleanor McHugh : > On 25 Feb 2009, at 21:54, Robert Klemme wrote: >> What I probably wanted to say was: if you consider beauty as a criterion >> for discussing languages it comes as no surprise that there is so little >> agreement among people. :-) > > A lot of these arguments though have less to do with beauty per se than they > do with an evangelical zeal to save the poor benighted heathens from their > dark and superstitious coding ways. Personally I like my superstitious ways > and I'm happy to leave benighted heathens to their own devices :) I see we seem to have a quite similar approach to those language "discussions". That's why my engagement in them is usually brief. There is no point in trying to "convert" someone of a different "belief". I find the meta discussion about what makes people have such strong feelings about particular positions and why they want to convert others much more interesting. I guess it has something to do with basic instincts of humans who need to know where they "belong to", i.e. what is their peer group and what are their convictions. But this discussion is rarely seen in our forums; maybe it has something to do with IT guys (they mostly are - unfortunately) seeing themselves as rational people who believe there are rational reasons for most or all of their decision. Which reminds me of zealotry in political leftist circles who also believe(d) that they know how history works and what it needs to make everyone happy. I find it surprising that after Third Reich and Gulag there are still people who believe that they are able to force happiness on everyone... >> PS: For me beauty in a program is clear structure and few but well chosen >> lines of code. > > The same here, and I like to believe that insofar as there are any objective > criterion for beauty in code those are the most easily expressed. What a wonderful conclusion of a lengthy debate! Warm regards robert -- remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end