[#16113] Strange idea... exporting from a scope — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

Hello...

33 messages 2001/06/01

[#16364] Re: Garbage Collection? — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

Windows 2000 and linux (RedHat 6.2). I have run these tests on both OSs.

12 messages 2001/06/09

[#16400] Symbolic Computation III — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>

14 messages 2001/06/11

[#16502] Playing with Ruby Syntax (was: Initial thoughts about Ruby From a Smalltalk Programmer) — jweirich@...

Michael> Hi Everyone, I have to say I'm utterly fascinated by Ruby

9 messages 2001/06/15

[#16661] Problem running irb with Ruby 1.6.4 under FreeBSD 4.0 — Bob Alexander <balexander@...>

I've installed Ruby 1.6.4 on a FreeBSD 4.0 machine, and get the

11 messages 2001/06/20

[#16686] opening db files made by apache dbmmanage — Fritz Heinrichmeyer <fritz.heinrichmeyer@...>

14 messages 2001/06/21

[#16801] rb_define_class() vs Class.new() — Kero van Gelder <kero@...4050.upc-d.chello.nl>

Hi,

18 messages 2001/06/23
[#16802] Re: rb_define_class() vs Class.new() — ts <decoux@...> 2001/06/23

>>>>> "K" == Kero van Gelder <kero@d4050.upc-d.chello.nl> writes:

[#16841] RE: national characters is strings — "Aleksei Guzev" <aleksei.guzev@...>

Next week I'll try to rebuild Ruby with Unicode strings. But it would be

15 messages 2001/06/25
[#16842] Re: national characters is strings — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/06/25

Hi,

[#16843] Re: national characters is strings — "Aleksei Guzev" <aleksei.guzev@...> 2001/06/25

That's good enough. But I'm afraid this could ( not would ) cause string

[#16868] Something strange with Ruby's inheritance mechanism — Eric Jacoboni <jaco@...>

As Ruby beginner, i try some "canonical" OO scripts. Doing so, I've

14 messages 2001/06/25
[#16873] RE: Something strange with Ruby's inheritance mechanism — "Aleksei Guzev" <aleksei.guzev@...> 2001/06/26

[#16879] Re: Something strange with Ruby's inheritance mechanism — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/06/26

On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Aleksei Guzev wrote:

[#16869] Something strange with Ruby's inheritance mechanism — Eric Jacoboni <jaco@...>

As Ruby beginner, i try some "canonical" OO scripts. Doing so, I've

12 messages 2001/06/25

[#16881] — "Aleksei Guzev" <aleksei.guzev@...>

32 messages 2001/06/26
[#16916] Re: Method overloading (option) Was: Re: — "Wayne Blair" <wayne.blair@...> 2001/06/26

[#16920] Re: Method overloading (option) Was: Re: — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/06/26

Hi,

[#16888] finalizers, destructors and whatnot — "David Leal" <david@...>

Hi all,

16 messages 2001/06/26

[#17037] keeping an Exception object alive — David Alan Black <dblack@...>

Hello --

19 messages 2001/06/28
[#17055] Re: keeping an Exception object alive — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/06/29

Hi,

[#17066] RCR: Exception methods (was: Re: Re: keeping an Exception object alive) — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2001/06/29

Hello --

[#17076] Re: RCR: Exception methods (was: Re: Re: keeping an Exception object alive) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/06/29

Hi,

[#17079] Re: RCR: Exception methods (was: Re: Re: keeping an Exception object alive) — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2001/06/29

Hello --

[#17138] Re: RCR: Exception methods (was: Re: Re: keeping an Exception object alive) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/07/02

Hi,

[#17141] Re: RCR: Exception methods (was: Re: Re: keeping an Exception object alive) — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2001/07/02

Hello --

[#17142] Re: RCR: Exception methods (was: Re: Re: keeping an Exception object alive) — ts <decoux@...> 2001/07/02

>>>>> "D" == David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

[ruby-talk:16176] Re: The Block Problem -A suggestion

From: Chris Moline <ugly-daemon@...>
Date: 2001-06-03 04:29:08 UTC
List: ruby-talk #16176
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 11:10:19AM +0900, Jim Freeze wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, Guy N. Hurst wrote:
> > Yikes! I hate "->"  much more than "<...>"
> > And array{i} won't go over well, either, since it has
> > such a different meaning already.
> >
> Yikes is right. :) I still have nightmares about perl's array
> and hash reference operators.
Well I guess no one likes -> :). No one commented on the use of square brackets
but I think its reasonable to assume its not liked either. I was thinking that
we would use () instead of || for block local arguments. Then it was pointed out
that this creates ambiguous code ie

(1..5).each ( ... ).method end

so i was thinking we could use square brackets instead. this wouldn't have the
above problem. But now as I think about it my proposal has a big problem -it's
too much change. So i am going to drop it and go with changing the meaning of
||.
> 
> I would prefer to have the current meaning of ||
> altered to be local to the block only. My reasons
> for this are that:
>   1) I think there are few programs that rely on this quirk
>   2) It is not good programming practice to rely on this quirk.
>      If you did this you deserve to have your code broken :)
>   3) If you need the old effect (ie, export a variable), it
>      is easy to explicitly implement (although a bit ugly):
> 
>      a_
>      5.times {|a| puts a; a_ = a}
>      a = a_
I think I would be in favour of the export proposed earlier instead of this.
That way if a variable is existing you can just use a unique block name and
assign to the outer scope. If it's not and you want it you can just export.
> 
> BTW, I have read several posts asking to see code where
> someone needed to see a value exported. I am still unclear
> on this point. I suppose if you exited early from a block
> that that would create a real need for exporting a value.
> BTW, how do you exit early from a block?
I have looked through the code I have and can't find anything but I can remember
doing this at least once. I wonder if anyone else can show examples??

Sorry for ->,
Chris Moline

In This Thread