[#16113] Strange idea... exporting from a scope — "Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@...>

Hello...

33 messages 2001/06/01

[#16364] Re: Garbage Collection? — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

Windows 2000 and linux (RedHat 6.2). I have run these tests on both OSs.

12 messages 2001/06/09

[#16400] Symbolic Computation III — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>

14 messages 2001/06/11

[#16502] Playing with Ruby Syntax (was: Initial thoughts about Ruby From a Smalltalk Programmer) — jweirich@...

Michael> Hi Everyone, I have to say I'm utterly fascinated by Ruby

9 messages 2001/06/15

[#16661] Problem running irb with Ruby 1.6.4 under FreeBSD 4.0 — Bob Alexander <balexander@...>

I've installed Ruby 1.6.4 on a FreeBSD 4.0 machine, and get the

11 messages 2001/06/20

[#16686] opening db files made by apache dbmmanage — Fritz Heinrichmeyer <fritz.heinrichmeyer@...>

14 messages 2001/06/21

[#16801] rb_define_class() vs Class.new() — Kero van Gelder <kero@...4050.upc-d.chello.nl>

Hi,

18 messages 2001/06/23
[#16802] Re: rb_define_class() vs Class.new() — ts <decoux@...> 2001/06/23

>>>>> "K" == Kero van Gelder <kero@d4050.upc-d.chello.nl> writes:

[#16841] RE: national characters is strings — "Aleksei Guzev" <aleksei.guzev@...>

Next week I'll try to rebuild Ruby with Unicode strings. But it would be

15 messages 2001/06/25
[#16842] Re: national characters is strings — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/06/25

Hi,

[#16843] Re: national characters is strings — "Aleksei Guzev" <aleksei.guzev@...> 2001/06/25

That's good enough. But I'm afraid this could ( not would ) cause string

[#16868] Something strange with Ruby's inheritance mechanism — Eric Jacoboni <jaco@...>

As Ruby beginner, i try some "canonical" OO scripts. Doing so, I've

14 messages 2001/06/25
[#16873] RE: Something strange with Ruby's inheritance mechanism — "Aleksei Guzev" <aleksei.guzev@...> 2001/06/26

[#16879] Re: Something strange with Ruby's inheritance mechanism — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/06/26

On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Aleksei Guzev wrote:

[#16869] Something strange with Ruby's inheritance mechanism — Eric Jacoboni <jaco@...>

As Ruby beginner, i try some "canonical" OO scripts. Doing so, I've

12 messages 2001/06/25

[#16881] — "Aleksei Guzev" <aleksei.guzev@...>

32 messages 2001/06/26
[#16916] Re: Method overloading (option) Was: Re: — "Wayne Blair" <wayne.blair@...> 2001/06/26

[#16920] Re: Method overloading (option) Was: Re: — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/06/26

Hi,

[#16888] finalizers, destructors and whatnot — "David Leal" <david@...>

Hi all,

16 messages 2001/06/26

[#17037] keeping an Exception object alive — David Alan Black <dblack@...>

Hello --

19 messages 2001/06/28
[#17055] Re: keeping an Exception object alive — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/06/29

Hi,

[#17066] RCR: Exception methods (was: Re: Re: keeping an Exception object alive) — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2001/06/29

Hello --

[#17076] Re: RCR: Exception methods (was: Re: Re: keeping an Exception object alive) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/06/29

Hi,

[#17079] Re: RCR: Exception methods (was: Re: Re: keeping an Exception object alive) — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2001/06/29

Hello --

[#17138] Re: RCR: Exception methods (was: Re: Re: keeping an Exception object alive) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/07/02

Hi,

[#17141] Re: RCR: Exception methods (was: Re: Re: keeping an Exception object alive) — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2001/07/02

Hello --

[#17142] Re: RCR: Exception methods (was: Re: Re: keeping an Exception object alive) — ts <decoux@...> 2001/07/02

>>>>> "D" == David Alan Black <dblack@candle.superlink.net> writes:

[ruby-talk:16630] Re: pickaxe: socket example on win

From: "Lyle Johnson" <ljohnson@...>
Date: 2001-06-19 19:15:58 UTC
List: ruby-talk #16630
> I just ran this on my NT box (with 1.6.2 -- I've overwritten my
> 1.6.3, sorry) and it works OK. What problems do you see?

I apologize for doing a "me too" post without investigating the problem any
further, but I don't have time to look into it at this very moment. I'm
having trouble on Windows 2000, with both Ruby 1.6.2 and Ruby 1.6.3, but the
error is different for each. When I run this example under Ruby 1.6.2, I get
the following traceback:

    /cygdrive/c/ruby/lib/ruby/1.6/net/protocol.rb:427:in `new': Invalid
argument - "connect(2)" (Errno::EINVAL)
     from /cygdrive/c/ruby/lib/ruby/1.6/net/protocol.rb:427:in `initialize'
     from /cygdrive/c/ruby/lib/ruby/1.6/net/protocol.rb:174:in `new'
     from /cygdrive/c/ruby/lib/ruby/1.6/net/protocol.rb:174:in `connect'
     from /cygdrive/c/ruby/lib/ruby/1.6/net/protocol.rb:135:in `start'
     from /cygdrive/c/ruby/lib/ruby/1.6/net/http.rb:459:in `connecting'
     from /cygdrive/c/ruby/lib/ruby/1.6/net/http.rb:439:in `common_oper'
     from /cygdrive/c/ruby/lib/ruby/1.6/net/http.rb:376:in `get2'
     from /cygdrive/c/ruby/lib/ruby/1.6/net/http.rb:366:in `get'
     from example.rb:3

whereas for Ruby 1.6.3, I get the following:

    /cygdrive/c/ruby-1.6.3/lib/ruby/1.6/net/protocol.rb:61:in `require':
dlopen: Win32 error 127 -
/cygdrive/c/ruby-1.6.3/lib/ruby/1.6/i386-cygwin/socket.so (LoadError)
     from /cygdrive/c/ruby-1.6.3/lib/ruby/1.6/net/protocol.rb:61
     from /cygdrive/c/ruby-1.6.3/lib/ruby/1.6/net/http.rb:268:in `require'
     from /cygdrive/c/ruby-1.6.3/lib/ruby/1.6/net/http.rb:268
     from example.rb:1:in `require'
     from example.rb:1

Lyle


In This Thread