From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) Date: 2001-06-02T01:15:39+09:00 Subject: [ruby-talk:16138] Re: Strange idea... exporting from a scope Hi, In message "[ruby-talk:16134] Re: Strange idea... exporting from a scope" on 01/06/01, Guillaume Cottenceau writes: |> I'm too lazy to type in "exprt" and variable name. so I'm thinking |> about automatic scope upgrade in the future Ruby, i.e. if you use |> local variable name out of its blocked scope, it would be |> automatically exported to the outer scope. | |Argh!? | |Local variables are sometimes used when you explicitely don't want them to |get exported in the outer scope... I meant propagation from local variable scope made by block, not out of other scopes (methods, classes etc.) matz.