[#129195] Is compatibility important for us? — Esteban Manchado Vel痙quez <zoso@...>

Hi all,

28 messages 2005/02/01
[#129199] Re: Is compatibility important for us? — James Britt <jamesUNDERBARb@...> 2005/02/01

Esteban Manchado Vel痙quez wrote:

[#129204] Re: Is compatibility important for us? — Francis Hwang <sera@...> 2005/02/01

[#129207] Re: Is compatibility important for us? — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/02/01

On 31 Jan 2005, at 18:21, Francis Hwang wrote:

[#129209] Re: Is compatibility important for us? — Francis Hwang <sera@...> 2005/02/01

[#129214] Re: Is compatibility important for us? — "Trans" <transfire@...> 2005/02/01

Francis,

[#129216] Re: Is compatibility important for us? — Francis Hwang <sera@...> 2005/02/01

[#129698] Re: Is compatibility important for us? — Esteban Manchado Vel痙quez <zoso@...> 2005/02/04

I had this on "postponed", and I just realized. Sorry.

[#129718] Re: Is compatibility important for us? — James Britt <jamesUNDERBARb@...> 2005/02/05

Esteban Manchado Vel痙quez wrote:

[#129808] Re: Is compatibility important for us? — Esteban Manchado Vel痙quez <zoso@...> 2005/02/05

On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 10:29:11AM +0900, James Britt wrote:

[#129218] Partial function application (was: Re: Binding precedence for first sym...) — E S <eero.saynatkari@...>

Trans wrote:

13 messages 2005/02/01
[#129220] Re: Partial function application (was: Re: Binding precedence for first sym...) — "Trans" <transfire@...> 2005/02/01

[#129289] Newbie: How to delete a Rails app (Windows) — peter.cutting@...

Hi

25 messages 2005/02/01
[#129362] Re: Newbie: How to delete a Rails app (Windows) — Douglas Livingstone <rampant@...> 2005/02/02

> but how do I delete? (If I just delete then I get a permissions

[#129373] Re: Newbie: How to delete a Rails app (Windows) — Caio Tiago Oliveira <caiot1@...> 2005/02/02

Douglas Livingstone, 2/2/2005 06:04:

[#129380] Re: Newbie: How to delete a Rails app (Windows) — peter.cutting@... 2005/02/02

yes the switching off may have helped (will try logging off next time

[#129385] Nuby needs an intro to testing for Win 2K — Barry Sperling <barry@...> 2005/02/02

[#129293] Re: [QUIZ] To Excel (#17) — "Graham Foster" <graham@...>

> Years ago, on a job developing custom reporting software, this was

15 messages 2005/02/01

[#129316] Wee 0.7.0 + Tutorial Videos — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>

Hi,

27 messages 2005/02/01
[#129449] Re: Wee 0.7.0 + Tutorial Videos — itsme213@... 2005/02/03

Michael, I may be doing something wrong, but none of the MPEGs worked

[#129345] ANN: ParseTree 1.3.3 and ruby2c 1.0.0 beta 1 — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

Actual announcements are on http://blog.zenspider.com/

24 messages 2005/02/02

[#129351] yarv and dbi — jm <jeffm@...>

Anyone out there tried dbi with yarv

18 messages 2005/02/02
[#129358] Re: yarv and dbi — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2005/02/02

jm <jeffm@ghostgun.com> wrote :

[#129451] - E01: The Java Failure - May Ruby Helps? — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

"

90 messages 2005/02/03
[#130693] Re: [EVALUATION] - E01: The Java Failure - May Ruby Helps? — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/02/13

Ilias Lazaridis wrote:

[#130749] Re: [EVALUATION] - E01: The Java Failure - May Ruby Helps? — Douglas Livingstone <rampant@...> 2005/02/14

> From the communities behaviour, I extract the following answer:

[#130784] Re: [EVALUATION] - E01: The Java Failure - May Ruby Helps? — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/02/14

Douglas Livingstone wrote:

[#130785] Re: [EVALUATION] - E01: The Java Failure - May Ruby Helps? — Luke Graham <spoooq@...> 2005/02/14

From the link - "fictive technology collection". Ive worked on some of

[#130786] Re: [EVALUATION] - E01: The Java Failure - May Ruby Helps? — Luke Graham <spoooq@...> 2005/02/14

Some of it is possible. I have created persistent Ruby objects, for

[#130823] Re: [EVALUATION] - E01: The Java Failure - May Ruby Helps? — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/02/14

On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 17:49:18 +0900, Luke Graham <spoooq@gmail.com> wrote:

[#130856] Re: [EVALUATION] - E01: The Java Failure - May Ruby Helps? — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/02/14

Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#130871] Re: [EVALUATION] - E01: The Java Failure - May Ruby Helps? — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/02/14

On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 04:09:54 +0900, Ilias Lazaridis

[#131021] Re: [EVALUATION] - E01: The Java Failure - May Ruby Helps? — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/02/15

Austin Ziegler wrote:

[#131025] Re: [EVALUATION] - E01: The Java Failure - May Ruby Helps? — Thomas E Enebo <enebo@...> 2005/02/15

On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Ilias Lazaridis defenestrated me:

[#131031] Re: [EVALUATION] - E01: The Java Failure - May Ruby Helps? — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/02/15

Thomas E Enebo wrote:

[#131036] Re: [EVALUATION] - E01: The Java Failure - May Ruby Helps? — Thomas E Enebo <enebo@...> 2005/02/15

On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Ilias Lazaridis defenestrated me:

[#131039] Re: [EVALUATION] - E01: The Java Failure - May Ruby Helps? — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/02/15

Thomas E Enebo wrote:

[#129452] RedCloth 3.0.2 -- Please, oh please, let this be the one — why the lucky stiff <ruby-talk@...>

Okay, okay. The tumblers are clicking, the clouds are parting.

15 messages 2005/02/03

[#129554] lack of reaction to latest ruby implementations — Alexander Kellett <ruby-lists@...>

working on alternatives for the ruby runtime has

37 messages 2005/02/03

[#129686] iteration the ruby way — Navindra Umanee <navindra@...>

Hi,

18 messages 2005/02/04

[#129726] Ruby for closed source projects — Michael Gebhart <mail@...>

Hi,

16 messages 2005/02/05

[#129778] Korundum: error when overriding a KDE::RootPixmap method — Martin Traverso <martin@...>

Hi,

15 messages 2005/02/05

[#129831] Benchmark Mono - Ruby — Michael Gebhart <mail@...>

Hi,

21 messages 2005/02/06

[#129878] Ruby Interactive Shell — "Jenjhiz" <jenjhiz@...>

Hello,

18 messages 2005/02/06

[#129959] delayed string interpolation — Navindra Umanee <navindra@...>

Hi,

14 messages 2005/02/07

[#130044] web testing with Ruby — Jason Sweat <jason.sweat@...>

Does anyone have suggestions for projects/libraries to web test code

12 messages 2005/02/07

[#130068] Grid computing with Ruby? — Alexander Staubo <alex@...>

I have an interest in distributed computing and so-called grid

11 messages 2005/02/08

[#130090] Squeak like environment for Ruby — Logan Capaldo <logancapaldo@...>

Lately I've been playing around with Squeak (http://www.squeak.org/),

20 messages 2005/02/08
[#130091] Re: Squeak like environment for Ruby — Caio Tiago Oliveira <caiot1@...> 2005/02/08

Logan Capaldo, 8/2/2005 00:45:

[#130108] Re: Squeak like environment for Ruby — Alexander Kellett <ruby-lists@...> 2005/02/08

On Feb 8, 2005, at 4:59 AM, Caio Tiago Oliveira wrote:

[#130102] Syck 0.50 -- The new YAML is here for testing — why the lucky stiff <ruby-talk@...>

Finally, I can go back to drawing ponies out on the bridge by the old

13 messages 2005/02/08

[#130180] Ruby users in India? — Premshree Pillai <premshree.pillai@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2005/02/08

[#130280] How to mimic Perl's `s///' in Ruby? — Jos Backus <jos@...>

Given Perl's

18 messages 2005/02/09

[#130305] Phone number to words — Jordi Bunster <jordi@...>

Does anyone have one of those algorithms that convert a phone number to

13 messages 2005/02/10

[#130327] Building a Better Functor — "John W. Long" <ng@...>

Hi,

29 messages 2005/02/10

[#130399] A Ruby-relevant quote from Alan Kay — "Curt Hibbs" <curt@...>

ACM Queue just published an interview with Alan Kay (the creator of

27 messages 2005/02/10
[#130400] Re: A Ruby-relevant quote from Alan Kay — PA <petite.abeille@...> 2005/02/10

[#130408] Re: A Ruby-relevant quote from Alan Kay — Douglas Livingstone <rampant@...> 2005/02/10

> Steve Wart about "why Smalltalk never caught on":

[#130573] utilizing ++ and -- for comments — "Pe, Botp" <botp@...>

Since ++ and -- wont see the light of day in ruby, can we use it for comment

27 messages 2005/02/12
[#130587] Re: utilizing ++ and -- for comments — "George Moschovitis" <george.moschovitis@...> 2005/02/12

I also think that the =begin, =end notation is not comfortable to use.

[#130595] Re: utilizing ++ and -- for comments — Douglas Livingstone <rampant@...> 2005/02/12

> for example /* */

[#130707] Printing why's (poignant) guide to ruby — Richard Dale <Richard_Dale@...>

I'd like to try ruby on non-programmers teaching them using why's amazing

62 messages 2005/02/13
[#130714] Re: Printing why's (poignant) guide to ruby — Navindra Umanee <navindra@...> 2005/02/13

Richard Dale <Richard_Dale@tipitina.demon.co.uk> wrote:

[#130716] Re: Printing why's (poignant) guide to ruby — Alexander Kellett <ruby-lists@...> 2005/02/13

i'm really puzzled by this.

[#130731] Re: Printing why's (poignant) guide to ruby — Navindra Umanee <navindra@...> 2005/02/13

Alexander Kellett <ruby-lists@lypanov.net> wrote:

[#130843] Re: Printing why's (poignant) guide to ruby — Marcus Sharp <brothermarcus@...> 2005/02/14

*putting on flame retardant pants*

[#130715] Ruby on Windows: debugger questions and comments — umptious@... (JC)

'm evaluating scripting languages for a client. Ruby as a language

28 messages 2005/02/13

[#130742] (OT) Programmer's editors for the Mac — Timothy Hunter <cyclists@...>

Just got a new Powerbook, so I'm looking for suggestions for a good

43 messages 2005/02/14

[#130975] Is this old style Ruby? — centrepins@...

In Why's guide, I see the line:

30 messages 2005/02/15
[#130980] Re: Is this old style Ruby? — Jeremy Tregunna <jtregunna@...> 2005/02/15

[#130982] Re: Is this old style Ruby? — Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-talk@...> 2005/02/15

* Jeremy Tregunna (Feb 15, 2005 15:10):

[#130986] Re: Is this old style Ruby? — centrepins@... 2005/02/15

Page 349 of the (printed) pickaxe2 mentions '::' and '.', but doesn't

[#130988] Re: Is this old style Ruby? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/02/15

Hi --

[#131103] Wee web-framework. It's great! — Joao Pedrosa <joaopedrosa@...>

Hi,

21 messages 2005/02/16
[#131111] Re: Wee web-framework. It's great! — "Vincent Foley" <vfoley@...> 2005/02/16

You know, I think Wee could become really hot if someone could mix it

[#131127] adding a dynamic method handler? (long post) — Mark Hubbart <discordantus@...>

Hi,

12 messages 2005/02/16

[#131132] Ruby + end user applications — "martinus" <martin.ankerl@...>

Ruby definitely needs more cool, simple to use, end user applications.

16 messages 2005/02/16

[#131168] FileSystem 0.1.0: Beta for me, Alpha for you — Francis Hwang <sera@...>

Greetings!

23 messages 2005/02/16

[#131252] Where is Ruby headed etc. — centrepins@... (Glenn)

A few musings/questions/dribble from an excited newbie. And my first

21 messages 2005/02/16
[#131256] Re: Where is Ruby headed etc. — Ben Giddings <bg-rubytalk@...> 2005/02/16

Glenn wrote:

[#131283] Re: Where is Ruby headed etc. — Brian McCallister <brianm@...> 2005/02/17

[#131286] Re: Where is Ruby headed etc. — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/02/17

Hi,

[#131275] installed ruby on linux without su access — Eko Budi Setiyo <contact_us@...>

Hi all,

17 messages 2005/02/17

[#131284] Ruby Visual Identity Team — "John W. Long" <ng@...>

Recently I've seen a couple of people mention how much they would like

43 messages 2005/02/17
[#131288] Re: Ruby Visual Identity Team — James Britt <jamesUNDERBARb@...> 2005/02/17

John W. Long wrote:

[#131307] Re: Ruby Visual Identity Team — gabriele renzi <rff_rff@...> 2005/02/17

James Britt ha scritto:

[#131404] - E02 - Nitro, a Ruby Based WebFramework — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>

50 messages 2005/02/17
[#131445] Re: [EVALUATION] - E02 - Nitro, a Ruby Based WebFramework — Aredridel <aredridel@...> 2005/02/17

>

[#131490] Re: [EVALUATION] - E02 - Nitro, a Ruby Based WebFramework — Luke Graham <spoooq@...> 2005/02/18

Wow, I actually predicted this post in another thread. Nitro vs ruby is clearly

[#131494] Re: [EVALUATION] - E02 - Nitro, a Ruby Based WebFramework — Alexander Kellett <ruby-lists@...> 2005/02/18

not too sure to be honest.

[#131496] Re: [EVALUATION] - E02 - Nitro, a Ruby Based WebFramework — Alexander Kellett <ruby-lists@...> 2005/02/18

i take this back i read some of the various

[#131506] Re: [EVALUATION] - E02 - Nitro, a Ruby Based WebFramework — Bill Guindon <agorilla@...> 2005/02/18

On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:30:49 +0900, Alexander Kellett

[#131592] Re: [EVALUATION] - E02 - Nitro, a Ruby Based WebFramework — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...> 2005/02/18

Bill Guindon <agorilla@gmail.com> writes:

[#131605] Re: [EVALUATION] - E02 - Nitro, a Ruby Based WebFramework — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...> 2005/02/18

Christian Neukirchen wrote:

[#131422] ICFP Contest Dates Are Set — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

It's pretty early yet, but a lot of coders need time to plan and gather

13 messages 2005/02/17

[#131469] Virtual Ruby Group — Zach Dennis <zdennis@...>

Ok, I have a question for fellow rubyists, rubyiers, etc... There seem

55 messages 2005/02/17
[#131906] Re: Virtual Ruby Group — Zach Dennis <zdennis@...> 2005/02/21

It looks like there are a few folks interested in the Virtual Ruby Group

[#131921] Re: Virtual Ruby Group — "Curt Hibbs" <curt@...> 2005/02/21

One more suggestion: you could make a FreeRIDE plugin out of jabber4r, and

[#131942] Re: Virtual Ruby Group — Tanner Burson <tanner.burson@...> 2005/02/21

On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:02:19 +0900, Curt Hibbs <curt@hibbs.com> wrote:

[#131946] Re: Virtual Ruby Group — Bill Guindon <agorilla@...> 2005/02/21

On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 00:41:36 +0900, Tanner Burson

[#132114] Re: Virtual Ruby Group — Zach Dennis <zdennis@...> 2005/02/23

Bill Guindon wrote:

[#131499] pulling my hair out, why won't Kernel.sleep(0) sleep? — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...>

Can anybody give me any hints as to what I should be looking for? What

17 messages 2005/02/18

[#131545] Require when Executed file is required by another file. — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...>

Hello,

11 messages 2005/02/18

[#131563] 1-800-THE-QUIZ (#20) — Ruby Quiz <james@...>

The three rules of Ruby Quiz:

12 messages 2005/02/18

[#131635] Rails presentation — Jamis Buck <jamis_buck@...>

So I gave a presentation on Rails to the Utah Java Users Group last

14 messages 2005/02/18

[#131685] FXIrb 0.14 - a Win32 GUI wrapper around IRB — Martin DeMello <martindemello@...>

- What?

19 messages 2005/02/18

[#131753] Array#join non string arguments — Simon Strandgaard <neoneye@...>

A proposal:

15 messages 2005/02/19

[#131808] destructive! operations — Navindra Umanee <navindra@...>

Hi,

58 messages 2005/02/20
[#131847] Re: destructive! operations — "Robert Klemme" <bob.news@...> 2005/02/20

[#131852] Re: destructive! operations — Caio Tiago Oliveira <caiot1@...> 2005/02/20

Robert Klemme, 20/2/2005 12:04:

[#131859] Re: destructive! operations — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2005/02/20

On Feb 20, 2005, at 10:23 AM, Caio Tiago Oliveira wrote:

[#131880] Re: destructive! operations — Navindra Umanee <navindra@...> 2005/02/20

James Edward Gray II <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:

[#131929] Re: destructive! operations — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/02/21

On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 06:07:58 +0900, Navindra Umanee

[#131939] Re: destructive! operations — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2005/02/21

From: "Christian Neukirchen" <chneukirchen@gmail.com>

[#131943] Re: destructive! operations — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...> 2005/02/21

"Bill Kelly" <billk@cts.com> writes:

[#131958] Re: destructive! operations — Pit Capitain <pit@...> 2005/02/21

Christian Neukirchen schrieb:

[#131964] Re: destructive! operations — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...> 2005/02/21

Pit Capitain <pit@capitain.de> writes:

[#131969] Re: destructive! operations — Pit Capitain <pit@...> 2005/02/21

Christian Neukirchen schrieb:

[#131973] Re: destructive! operations — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...> 2005/02/21

Pit Capitain <pit@capitain.de> writes:

[#131985] Re: destructive! operations — "ES" <ruby-ml@...> 2005/02/21

On Mon, February 21, 2005 6:07 pm, Christian Neukirchen said:

[#131988] Re: destructive! operations — Pit Capitain <pit@...> 2005/02/21

ES schrieb:

[#131940] ANN: 2005 International Obfuscated Ruby Code Contest (IORCC) — Todd Nathan <iorcc@...>

Dear Fellow Rubists,

39 messages 2005/02/21
[#132095] Re: ANN: 2005 International Obfuscated Ruby Code Contest (IORCC) — "Josef 'Jupp' Schugt" <jupp@...> 2005/02/22

Todd Nathan wrote:

[#132102] Re: ANN: 2005 International Obfuscated Ruby Code Contest (IORCC) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/02/22

Hi,

[#132105] Re: ANN: 2005 International Obfuscated Ruby Code Contest (IORCC) — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/02/22

Hi --

[#132107] Re: ANN: 2005 International Obfuscated Ruby Code Contest (IORCC) — Bill Guindon <agorilla@...> 2005/02/22

On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 08:23:08 +0900, David A. Black <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:

[#132036] Proposal for nil, 0, and "" in an if statement — Dan Fitzpatrick <dan@...>

The following was derived from a portion of the destrutive! operations

38 messages 2005/02/22
[#132041] Re: Proposal for nil, 0, and "" in an if statement — David Heinemeier Hansson <david@...> 2005/02/22

> Here is a proposal for evaluating "", 0, and nil in an if statement:

[#132046] Re: Proposal for nil, 0, and "" in an if statement — Pit Capitain <pit@...> 2005/02/22

David Heinemeier Hansson schrieb:

[#132047] Re: Proposal for nil, 0, and "" in an if statement — Gavin Kistner <gavin@...> 2005/02/22

On Feb 22, 2005, at 6:41 AM, Pit Capitain wrote:

[#132053] Re: Proposal for nil, 0, and "" in an if statement — Gavin Kistner <gavin@...> 2005/02/22

On Feb 22, 2005, at 6:47 AM, Gavin Kistner wrote:

[#132054] Re: Proposal for nil, 0, and "" in an if statement — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/02/22

Hi --

[#132156] surprising: class A; end; A === A ==> false — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...>

I'm used to thinking of === being MORE useful

10 messages 2005/02/23

[#132186] Lighting the candles on the cake? — James Britt <jamesUNDERBARb@...>

Don't want to eat birthday cake too soon, but I know that someplace it's

12 messages 2005/02/24

[#132246] Simple HTML Renderer / Browser? — Randy Kramer <rhkramer@...>

I need a simple HTML renderer (to get started--eventually, I want to be able

18 messages 2005/02/24

[#132257] ruby-talk.com Expired? — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

I use http://ruby-talk.com/# style links on the Ruby Quiz site and I

13 messages 2005/02/24

[#132373] Ajax: A New Approach to Web Applications — "Curt Hibbs" <curt@...>

I always have trouble remembering whether its HttpXmlRequest, or

37 messages 2005/02/25
[#132379] Re: [OT] Ajax: A New Approach to Web Applications — "James G. Britt " <ruby.talk.list@...> 2005/02/25

On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 06:45:34 +0900, Curt Hibbs <curt@hibbs.com> wrote:

[#132382] Re: [OT] Ajax: A New Approach to Web Applications — "Curt Hibbs" <curt@...> 2005/02/25

James G. Britt wrote:

[#132375] Re: [OT] Ajax: A New Approach to Web Applications — PA <petite.abeille@...> 2005/02/25

[#132455] RubyGems 0.8.5 — Jim Weirich <jim@...>

= Announce: RubyGems Release 0.8.5

23 messages 2005/02/27
[#132525] RubyGems 0.8.6 (was Re: [ANN] RubyGems 0.8.5) — Chad Fowler <chadfowler@...> 2005/02/27

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:34:34 +0900, Jim Weirich <jim@weirichhouse.org> wrote:

[#132500] Parsers vs. Homemade "Parsing" via REs — Randy Kramer <rhkramer@...>

I have the need to translate several megabytes of TWiki marked up text to

10 messages 2005/02/27

A REAL money maker. IT REALLY WORKS!!!

From: Chris48224@...
Date: 2005-02-11 23:45:02 UTC
List: ruby-talk #130563
Try this out, it works!!!! Turn $10 into $10,000 with PayPal, easy and
quick. PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO READ THIS INFORMATION. THIS REALLY
WORKS!!! " I WAS SHOCKED WHEN I SAW HOW MUCH MONEY CAME FLOODING INTO
MY PAYPAL ACCOUNT." -Mark 2004

Dear Friend,
This is a new program, as you will see. It can be for the U.S. Canada,
S.E Asia or the U.K. This is a fantastic opportunity. Try it for
yourself!! EVERYTHING DONE ONLINE! With just $10 or  and a PayPal
PREMIER or BUSINESS account, you could make $$Thousands$$ in 2 SIMPLE
STEPS! GUARANTEED - you will have $10,000 in two weeks. Only $10, a
PayPal PREMIER or BUSINESS account and 30 minutes are all that is
needed to get this going. If you want to make a few thousand dollars
real quick, then PLEASE take a moment to read and understand the MLM
program I'm sharing with you. No it's not what you think. YOU
DONエT have to send $10 to five or six people to buy a report, receipt
or get on their mailing list. Nor will you need to invest more money.
You will be able to complete it in LESS THAN 30 MINUTES and you will
NEVER FORGET THE DAY YOU FIRST VIEWED THIS ONLINE.

If you're already running a home business, you can easily do this one
along with it. If not, this is the FASTEST and EASIEST way to earn
serious money online that you've ever seen so far in the history of
the Internet! This program works no matter what country you are in, or
what currency you use. It doesn't matter how old or how young you
are. And you certainly won't need any special knowledge or talent.
You won't need to run a website, or make phone calls, or make
photocopies, or send out letters through the mail, or pay for
advertising, etc. The only things you will need are:
* an email address
* A Premier or Business PayPal account with at least $10 deposited in
it
* 30 minutes of your time

ONLY 2 SIMPLE AND EASY STEPS! ! If you are doing other programs, by all
means stay with them. The more the merrier, BUT PLEASE READ ON!! First
of all, there are only TWO POSITIONS, not realistic and
much, MUCH FASTER. Because it is so easy, the response rate for this
program is VERY HIGH and VERY FAST, and you will receive your reward in
FOURTEEN DAYS. That's only TWO WEEKS! Not one or two months. Just in
time for next months BILLS. TRUE STORY -- Grace Kelly tells how she ran
this gifting summation four times
last year. The first time, she received $6,000 in cash in two weeks and
then $14,000 in cash the next three times.
THIS CAN AND WILL WORK FOR YOU! HERE ARE THE DETAILS: Post this letter
in 50 message boards, chat rooms, or newsgroup. You don't need to
post 200 like other programs or email 100 people just to get
started. Even if you are already in a program like the "send twenty
dollars to six people", CONTINUE IT and stay with it, THOSE DO PAY
OUT, but do yourself a favor, DO THIS ONE TODAY as well, RIGHT NOW!!!
It is simple and takes a very small investment, only $10 and a PayPal
PREMIER or BUSINESS account. IT WORKS AND IS DONE IN 2 SIMPLE AND EASY
STEPS! ! This program WILL PAY FASTER before the other programs you are
working on even trickle in!! Follow the simple instructions and in two
weeks, you should have $10,000 because most PEOPLE WILL RESPOND due to
the LOW ONE TIME INVESTMENT, SPEED AND HIGH PROFIT
POTENTIAL, PLUS, since its done ALL ONLINE, there is no time-wasted
mailing out letters and such!!! We are not even figuring a 50%
response! So let's all keep it going and help each other in these
tough times. We all owe money to bill collectors, and creditors. But,
with this, if people take the time to help each other, the good fortune
will follow. SO, Take the measly minutes this SIMPLE and REWARDING
program offers and give the gift that gives back TODAY!!! HEREエS WHAT
YOU NEED TO DO:

STEP 1
Ok, if you're not already a PayPal user, the very first thing you
need to do is
use the PayPal link below and SIGN UP. It takes just two minutes!
Here's the URL. Just click on the PayPal link below:
https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_registration-run
Be sure to use this link so you can sign up for a free PREMIER or
BUSINESS
account. You'll need to have a PREMIER or BUSINESS account (and not a
PERSONAL account) otherwise you won't be able to receive credit card
payments from other people.

STEP 2
It is an undeniable law of the universe that we must first give in
order to receive. So the first thing to do when you have your
Premier/Business PayPal account is to IMMEDIATELY send a $10 payment
from your PayPal account to the person at POSITION #1, if...
Your birthday is BETWEEN JAN 1 THRU JUNE 30,
OR, if...
-- your birthday is BETWEEN JULY 1 THRU DEC 31, send the
gift to the person at POSITION # 2.
Along with a note saying: "HERE IS A $10 GIFT FOR YOU." Be certain to
add this note, as this is what KEEPS THIS PROGRAM LEGAL. Instructions
on how to send a payment are under "SEND MONEY" at the PayPal Site.
It's so Easy!!! When you send your $10 payment to the first address
in the list, do it with a great big smile on your face because "as you
sow, so shall you reap!"  When this program is continued, as it should
be, EVERYONE PROFITS!! DONエT BE AFRAID to send gifts to strangers. It
will come back to you ten folds. A person can give you up to $10,000
per year and you don't have to report it to the IRS!
Here are the current positions:
* POSITION#1 --- chris48224 at yahoo.com
* POSITION#2 --- executioner_2k at yahoo.com
(sorry the emails don't show up correctly on these Google posts in @
format, change them to ___@___. ___)
After you have transferred a $10 payment to the email address,
something very eerie happens. It gives you an indescribable,
overwhelming sense of certainty, belief and conviction in the system.
You've just proved to yourself that, because you have done it, there
must be a great number of other people ready to do exactly the same.
Thus you have now seen for yourself, first hand, that this business
actually works!
REMOVE the email address you are replacing (the one you sent $10 to),
and REPLACE it with your own email address. REMEMBER: Use the same
EMAIL ADDRESS that is used with YOUR PayPal account!!! Paste your newly
typed email address over the old one and then post to 50 Message
Boards, Chat Rooms, or Newsgroups. DONエT MULL OVER IT, JUST 30MIN OF
YOUR TIME, THATエS IT THERE IS NO MORE TO DO!! ACT FAST AND GET THE
GIFT. HONESTLY AND INTEGRITY MAKE THIS PLAN WORK!! DO TO OTHERS, AS YOU
WOULD HAVE THEM DO TO YOU. YOUR NAME COULD CYCLE FOR A LONG TIME! !
THIS MAKES IT THE GIFT THAT KEEPS ON GIVING.

This is excellent seed money to start or expand a business, buy you
dream home, car, and pay off whatever bills you may have. Good luck and
God Bless. Play fairly. Good fortune will follow. WHY THIS PROGRAM
WORKS:
!! HONESTY AND INTEGRITY!! Straight to the point, the reason this
program is SO SUCCESSFUL is because when you follow these instructions
EXACTLY = GIVE A $10 GIFT and POST this in 50 different message boards,
there are only TWO outcomes. (1) A person's birthday will fall on the
same half as yours, therefore, YOU GET
THE $10... OR, (2) a persons birthday will fall on the other half of
the timeline, therefore, YOU STAY IN YOUR POSITION and get posted in 50
other MESSAGE BOARDS, etc. BOTTOMLINE: Either you get the $10 or your
name gets passed on for other people to give YOU $10 or pass YOUR name
on to other people that will. It makes you think though, the more you
POST YOUR OWN POSTS, the BETTER the results!!!

4 FACTORS THAT MAKE THIS PROGRAM SO SUCCESSFUL...
* EXTREMELY FAST RESPONSE
* EXTREMELY HIGH RESPONSE RATE
* UNLIMITED PROFIT POTENTIAL
* QUICK, SIMPLE AND CHEAP TO GET STARTED

So there it is. You now have the knowledge that will enable you to make
over $10,000 within the next two weeks. The only thing that can hold
you back now is a lack of faith or a lack of self-belief. However, any
doubts you may currently have will disappear within a few days of
putting this plan into practice. Trust me on this! You certainly
won't regret it. SOME NOTES FROM PAYPAL WHICH YOU MAY FIND USEFUL:
PayPal lets you pay anyone with an email address and is the world's
Number 1 online payment service. PayPal is accepted on over 3 million
eBay auctions as well as a countless number of online shops. You can
also use PayPal to pay your friends - for example, it's a convenient
way to split the phone bill with your room-mate, send cash to your kids
in college, or send cash to someone in another country. Better yet, you
can also earn a referral bonus of up to $100 each time someone signs up
for a PayPal account using your referral URL! When you send money
through PayPal, you can fund your payments with your credit card or
checking account. You won't have to worry about your privacy, because
PayPal keeps your accounting information safe and secure. Making a
purchase with PayPal is far more secure than mailing a check or giving
your credit card number to a stranger. That's why over 9 MILLION
people from around the world use PayPal to move money. Signing up for a
PayPal account is free, easy, and it takes only a couple of minutes.
Thank you, and good luck in your ventures P.S. Does this sound too
good? Well maybe to some skeptics it is. But it actually works, and is
worth the 30 minutes of your time now. So, just make a nice cup of tea
and get started on it now. After all, you can't lose, but you stand
to gain more in the next few weeks than many people earn in a year.



In This Thread

Prev Next