From: Csaba Henk <csaba@..._for_avoiding_spam.org>
Date: 2005-02-18T20:24:48+09:00
Subject: Re: A Ruby-relevant quote from Alan Kay

On 2005-02-18, Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net> wrote:
> in the program. Why do I use one syntax when passing only one block to
> a method, but a different syntax when passing two?

That one block thing is just what needed in the 92% of cases. So I think it was
reasonable to choose this as the thing to be sugared to death. 

If you think a little bit, you'll see that you couldn't put together a
similarly comofortable sugaring scheme such that it's usable for passing
multiple blocks/procs in a sugared way.

Csaba