From: Mark Hubbart <discordantus@...>
Date: 2005-02-20T07:13:44+09:00
Subject: Re: Array#===

On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 07:04:44 +0900, Martin DeMello
<martindemello@yahoo.com> wrote:
> It seems a bit of a waste for Array#=== to default to Object#=== - it'd
> be far more useful, IMO, to have it call include?. Can anyone see a
> drawback to this?

I've wondered about this too. It seems that the === method loosely
translates to a membership test, so it would make sense if it tested
membership with arrays, as well as ranges and classes and regexps. I
can't see any drawbacks, though. (though that doesn't mean there
aren't any)

cheers,
Mark