From: benny <listen@...>
Date: 2005-02-19T01:29:46+09:00
Subject: Re: adding a dynamic method handler? (long post)

Mark Hubbart wrote:

> I've been wishing
> for a version of method_missing that allows the dynamic methods to act
> more like they are real methods on the object.

I am not sure what you mean by dynamic methods. But in case only Structs are
concerned wouldn't it make more sence to redefine method_missing for
*Structs(Open-Super, ...).?


benny