From: James Britt <jamesUNDERBARb@...>
Date: 2005-02-27T02:01:45+09:00
Subject: Re: AJAX? Why not AJYL?  (Re: [OT] Ajax: A New Approach to Web Applications)

Francis Hwang wrote:
> 
> On Feb 26, 2005, at 10:20 AM, James Britt wrote:
> 
>> It lends itself to the acronym AJYL, which is reasonably clever, but 
>> I'm not sure there are any advantages over using JSON.
> 
> 
> AJYL would be pronounced like Agile, and that word is already taken in 
> the programming namespace.

That's  the point.  Different spelling, same principle.


James