From: Luke Graham <spoooq@...>
Date: 2005-02-18T11:29:14+09:00
Subject: Re: [EVALUATION] - E02 - Nitro, a Ruby Based WebFramework

Im investigating nitro myself now, so trolls can be a catalyst for
good as much as for evil. They just cause people to show their
true selves. Hes stimulated lots of useful conversation
here so far, which has got to be the ultimate proof that ruby
programmers have only good in their hearts. :D


On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:19:07 +0900, Alexander Kellett
<ruby-lists@lypanov.net> wrote:
> not too sure to be honest.
> i'm guessing he's so full of buzzwords and
> "enabling technologies" that we're having
> difficulty really understanding what he wants ;)
> the response from george on nitro-general
> was actually interesting :) thusly proving
> how nice the community really are :)
> Alex
> 
> On Feb 18, 2005, at 2:45 AM, Luke Graham wrote:
> > Wow, I actually predicted this post in another thread. Nitro vs ruby
> > is clearly
> > his aim.
> >
> > Ari : Hes trying to accomplish what all trolls aim for - grief.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 06:54:05 +0900, Aredridel <aredridel@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>>
> >>> [V0.4 - draft]
> >>>
> >>> This is the main page of the fictive technology collection jamStack,
> >>> which serves as an evaluation template for real live technology and
> >>> tools collections.
> >>> IDE
> >>>
> >>> An IDE is not contained in this technology stack. An IDE supports
> >>> this
> >>> technology stack (and possibly adds/enhances some of the
> >>> functionality).
> >>> Analysis&Design
> >>
> >> what are you trying to accomplish?
> >>
> >> Ari
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > spooq
> 
> 


-- 
spooq