From: benny <listen@...>
Date: 2005-02-19T01:29:47+09:00
Subject: Re: adding a dynamic method handler? (long post)

benny wrote:

> Mark Hubbart wrote:
> 
>> I've been wishing
>> for a version of method_missing that allows the dynamic methods to act
>> more like they are real methods on the object.
> 
> I am not sure what you mean by dynamic methods. But in case only Structs
> are concerned wouldn't it make more sence to redefine method_missing for
> *Structs(Open-Super, ...).?
> 
> 
> benny

Oh, I am sorry: this was kind of stupid, since method_missing belongs to
Kernel :(

benny