From: Ilias Lazaridis Date: 2005-02-14T21:14:56+09:00 Subject: Re: [EVALUATION] - E01: The Java Failure - May Ruby Helps? Luke Graham wrote: > Some of it is possible. I have created persistent Ruby objects, for > example. Persistent code is possible with some hacking, Ive done > something that at least looks like persistent Ruby code from a > distance, if you squint ;) Databases work. I use Ruby to generate C > code, so you can make generators with it. Its open-source. It can be > used remotely, there are packages around to send code across networks. > You can get stuck into a reasonable amount of metadata for a language > that isnt written in itself. Anything else you really want to know? Yes, I would like to know if all this you have done is based on some implemetations which are standard within the ruby community. I would like something like: create object ... make it persistent with XYZpersist obj.save ... make a gui with XYZgui obj. ... .... and so on. - something, that I could give a newcomer to ruby (which knows object orientation), and he could start immediatly to be productive. .. [...] >>>http://lazaridis.com/case/stack/index.html >>> >>>describes mostly state-of-the-art integrated commercial development >>>systems, nothing more. >>> >>>I just want to know, which of the constructs are supported within the >>>ruby world: which systems exist and which would I have to implement myself. .. -- http://lazaridis.com