From: Bill Guindon <agorilla@...>
Date: 2005-02-23T08:42:46+09:00
Subject: Re: ANN: 2005 International Obfuscated Ruby Code Contest (IORCC)

On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 08:23:08 +0900, David A. Black <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
> Hi --
> 
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > In message "Re: ANN: 2005 International Obfuscated Ruby Code Contest (IORCC)"
> >    on Wed, 23 Feb 2005 06:37:50 +0900, Josef 'Jupp' Schugt <jupp@gmx.de> writes:
> >
> > |An ORCC doesn't seem to be a good idea. I already hear them saying "See
> > |this? They keep on saying that Ruby code is much cleaner than Perl code.
> > |Don't believe their lies."
> >
> > Well, it is a good chance to prove them we can write pretty unreadable
> > code as well as readable code.
> 
> Is that "pretty" as in "somewhat", or "pretty" as in "nice-looking"?
> :-)

How about "pretty" and "pretty unreadable"?
http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/124391

I'm still impressed by that one (obviously)

-- 
Bill Guindon (aka aGorilla)