From: Ilias Lazaridis Date: 2005-02-16T06:44:52+09:00 Subject: Re: [EVALUATION] - E01: The Java Failure - May Ruby Helps? E S wrote: >>L�hett�j�: Ilias Lazaridis >>Aihe: Re: [EVALUATION] - E01: The Java Failure - May Ruby Helps? >> >>Austin Ziegler wrote: >>[...] - (increased complexity, lost context) >> >>I'm sorry, I cannot continue the discussion. >> >>I just ask the community to point at least to an clear overview of the >>building-blocks which I can use within ruby. >> >>As stated in another message: >> >>" >>If i find e.g. 70% fo my requirements fulfilled within ruby, I would >>possibly start to implement the remaining 30%. >> >>But possibly I should split my requirements down into smaller chunks, >>and ask step by step. >>" >> >>- >> >>So, most possibly I have to go this way. >> >>Asking step by step. > > This may sound like a stupid idea, but since it seems that these tools > you crave for already exist in some form (even if they are proprietary > and/or expensive), would it be too much trouble for you to name one > for each 'frame' in your 'stack'? This is a very nice idea. But I cannot name them. > For example: "I need a tool that can > create anything that I want (currently VaporStudio from Imagitasy can > do this)". This would help in giving you some concrete answers as it > could help explain what you want, exactly (your 'stack' is > ridiculously vague). I think the stack is very concise and precise. Another thing is, if it is imlementable. I will take the single-step-approach. Will open a new thread with the first part shortly. [If someone has answers to the full stack, they are of course welcome] > Secondly, and this may be just a language barrier issue, you come > across as either a troll or just hostile. Revising your tone (or > offering some other explanation) would probably help a lot. It's not a language barrier issue. I can change my [sterile, fact-oriented] writing-style. But I will not. .. -- http://lazaridis.com