[#10193] String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...>

Hi,

41 messages 2007/02/05
[#10197] Re: String.ord — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/02/06

Hi,

[#10198] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#10199] Re: String.ord — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2007/02/06

David Flanagan wrote:

[#10200] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#10208] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10213] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10215] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10216] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/07

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10288] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8597, was opened at 2007-02-13 16:10

12 messages 2007/02/13

[#10321] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8676, was opened at 2007-02-15 10:09

11 messages 2007/02/15

[#10323] Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

Some of the Ruby code used by TextMate makes use of xmlrpc/

31 messages 2007/02/15
[#10324] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/02/15

> -----Original Message-----

[#10326] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/15

On Feb 15, 2007, at 1:29 PM, Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#10342] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

While I am complaining about xmlrpc, we have another issue. It's

[#10343] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — Alex Young <alex@...> 2007/02/16

James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#10344] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

On Feb 16, 2007, at 12:08 PM, Alex Young wrote:

Re: Latest Update to RHG --

From: Mathieu Blondel <mblondel@...>
Date: 2007-02-28 18:02:29 UTC
List: ruby-core #10454
Charles Thornton wrote:
>
> 1) The primary reason is that the Ruby Forge  Project is stalled -- 
> They have indicated that they are not actively continuing with 
> translation.
I am pretty sure that if you had asked the project administrator for a 
subversion access, he would have granted you one.
> 2) I do not merge Machine Translations and their "Quality" Translations!!
That is a good thing. Sorry, my mistake then.
> 3) I have been the only active person I know that has made a 
> continuing effort to complete this project.
Same answer as for 1)
> 4) Since I do not speak Japanese, I must research each sub-topic or 
> heading and write down the results. The machine
>    translation give some clues, but it generally it is my prose.
Well, then you are writing your own book. It is not a translation anymore.
>
>       4) Feel Free to be as critical as you wish -- TO OFFEND ME you 
> must have a unique and massive vocabulary,
>            bring friends and lunch ;-) ;-) !
Nobody wants to offend you. I was just asking the reasons for starting a 
separate project. I am still thinking it would have been a better idea 
if the two translation efforts had joined their forces.

Mathieu

In This Thread