[#10193] String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...>

Hi,

41 messages 2007/02/05
[#10197] Re: String.ord — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/02/06

Hi,

[#10198] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#10199] Re: String.ord — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2007/02/06

David Flanagan wrote:

[#10200] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#10208] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10213] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10215] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10216] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/07

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10288] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8597, was opened at 2007-02-13 16:10

12 messages 2007/02/13

[#10321] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8676, was opened at 2007-02-15 10:09

11 messages 2007/02/15

[#10323] Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

Some of the Ruby code used by TextMate makes use of xmlrpc/

31 messages 2007/02/15
[#10324] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/02/15

> -----Original Message-----

[#10326] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/15

On Feb 15, 2007, at 1:29 PM, Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#10342] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

While I am complaining about xmlrpc, we have another issue. It's

[#10343] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — Alex Young <alex@...> 2007/02/16

James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#10344] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

On Feb 16, 2007, at 12:08 PM, Alex Young wrote:

Singleton Inheritance?

From: Charles Thornton <ceo@...>
Date: 2007-02-11 18:27:44 UTC
List: ruby-core #10279
I am in the process of converting Ruby Hacker's Guide to English.

Working with the section on CLASSES I got from the Ruby Forge
Project I ran across this explanation of Singleton Inheritance with
a odd diagram -- That I think is dead wrong -- See Attachment
"ch_class_addclass.jpg".

I have checked the code carefully in several places and the node
chart I came up with is  "ch_minimum_modclass2.jpg"

The basic sequence as far as I can tell is basically this:

1) Create a new class XX (klass => rb_cClass, super=> rb_cObject)
2) Create a Metaclass YY (klass => rb_cClass, super=> Metaclass_Object)
3) Change XX (klass => YY)
4) Create 'Attached' Link in  YY that  points at XX.

    (obj) ==> XX ==> (rb_cClass)                  -- After XX Created
    (obj) ==> XX ==>YY ==> (rb_cClass)    -- After YY Created and Klass 
Pointer adjusted!

The RHG version seems to indicate that the constant points a the Metaclass
which points at the klass and the klass points at the super!

(obj) ==> (MetaClass) ==> (klass) ==> (super) ??

IS THERE SOMETHING I AM MISSING?    Or was there a conversion mistake at 
Ruby Forge??


Attachments (2)

In This Thread

Prev Next