[#10193] String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...>

Hi,

41 messages 2007/02/05
[#10197] Re: String.ord — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/02/06

Hi,

[#10198] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#10199] Re: String.ord — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2007/02/06

David Flanagan wrote:

[#10200] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#10208] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10213] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10215] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10216] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/07

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10288] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8597, was opened at 2007-02-13 16:10

12 messages 2007/02/13

[#10321] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8676, was opened at 2007-02-15 10:09

11 messages 2007/02/15

[#10323] Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

Some of the Ruby code used by TextMate makes use of xmlrpc/

31 messages 2007/02/15
[#10324] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/02/15

> -----Original Message-----

[#10326] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/15

On Feb 15, 2007, at 1:29 PM, Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#10342] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

While I am complaining about xmlrpc, we have another issue. It's

[#10343] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — Alex Young <alex@...> 2007/02/16

James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#10344] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

On Feb 16, 2007, at 12:08 PM, Alex Young wrote:

Re: Segmentation fault: Ruby 1.8.5 Under VC++ express 2005

From: Masaki Suketa <masaki.suketa@...>
Date: 2007-02-15 13:45:39 UTC
List: ruby-core #10319
Hello,

In message "Re: Segmentation fault: Ruby 1.8.5 Under VC++ express 2005"
    on 07/02/15, "U.Nakamura" <usa@garbagecollect.jp> writes:

> Perhaps, I discovered the solution.
> Suketa-san, could you test attached code with VC++8 and tell
> me the result?

Here is the result.

* with VC++8 (Express Edition)

MSVCRT version : 8.0.50727.42
dummy test fd: 3
fd:0 adrs:008820B0 handle:00000003 flag:c1
fd:1 adrs:008820D8 handle:00000007 flag:c1
fd:2 adrs:00882100 handle:0000000B flag:c1
fd:3 adrs:00882128 handle:000003B4 flag:c1
fd:4 adrs:00882150 handle:FFFFFFFF flag:00
fd:5 adrs:00882178 handle:FFFFFFFF flag:00
fd:6 adrs:008821A0 handle:FFFFFFFF flag:00
fd:7 adrs:008821C8 handle:FFFFFFFF flag:00
fd:8 adrs:008821F0 handle:FFFFFFFF flag:00
fd:9 adrs:00882218 handle:FFFFFFFF flag:00

  Regards,
  Masaki Suketa


In This Thread