[#10193] String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...>

Hi,

41 messages 2007/02/05
[#10197] Re: String.ord — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/02/06

Hi,

[#10198] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#10199] Re: String.ord — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2007/02/06

David Flanagan wrote:

[#10200] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#10208] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10213] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10215] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10216] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/07

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10288] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8597, was opened at 2007-02-13 16:10

12 messages 2007/02/13

[#10321] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8676, was opened at 2007-02-15 10:09

11 messages 2007/02/15

[#10323] Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

Some of the Ruby code used by TextMate makes use of xmlrpc/

31 messages 2007/02/15
[#10324] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/02/15

> -----Original Message-----

[#10326] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/15

On Feb 15, 2007, at 1:29 PM, Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#10342] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

While I am complaining about xmlrpc, we have another issue. It's

[#10343] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — Alex Young <alex@...> 2007/02/16

James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#10344] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

On Feb 16, 2007, at 12:08 PM, Alex Young wrote:

Possible problem submitting patch #8513

From: Luther <lutherfire@...>
Date: 2007-02-26 05:36:08 UTC
List: ruby-core #10422
On 2007-2-8, I submitted a patch on rubyforge. Two days later, I
found out the patch did not actually upload, so I added the file to
the patch report. Due to the uploading problem I had, I'm afraid my
patch may have gone unnoticed, so I'm now posting it directly to the
list. Here's the original patch report:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&aid=8513&group_id=426&atid=1700

ChangeLog:
* lib/rdoc/generators/template/html/html.rb (RDoc::Page::STYLE):
Defined text color.

Comments are welcome...

Luther Thompson


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go 
with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail 

Attachments (1)

rdoccolor.patch (364 Bytes, text/x-diff)
Index: lib/rdoc/generators/template/html/html.rb
===================================================================
--- lib/rdoc/generators/template/html/html.rb	(revision 11885)
+++ lib/rdoc/generators/template/html/html.rb	(working copy)
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
     margin: 0;
     margin-left: 40px;
     padding: 0;
+    color: black;
     background: white;
 }
 

In This Thread

Prev Next