[#10193] String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...>

Hi,

41 messages 2007/02/05
[#10197] Re: String.ord — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/02/06

Hi,

[#10198] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#10199] Re: String.ord — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2007/02/06

David Flanagan wrote:

[#10200] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#10208] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10213] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10215] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10216] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/07

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10288] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8597, was opened at 2007-02-13 16:10

12 messages 2007/02/13

[#10321] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8676, was opened at 2007-02-15 10:09

11 messages 2007/02/15

[#10323] Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

Some of the Ruby code used by TextMate makes use of xmlrpc/

31 messages 2007/02/15
[#10324] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/02/15

> -----Original Message-----

[#10326] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/15

On Feb 15, 2007, at 1:29 PM, Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#10342] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

While I am complaining about xmlrpc, we have another issue. It's

[#10343] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — Alex Young <alex@...> 2007/02/16

James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#10344] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

On Feb 16, 2007, at 12:08 PM, Alex Young wrote:

[ ruby-Bugs-8597 ] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets

From: <noreply@...>
Date: 2007-02-13 15:10:37 UTC
List: ruby-core #10288
Bugs item #8597, was opened at 2007-02-13 16:10
You can respond by visiting: 
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=8597&group_id=426

Category: Standard Library
Group: 1.8.4
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Kristoffer Lund辿n (stoffe)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: Socket library should support abstract unix sockets

Initial Comment:
See this post about abstract unix sockets, discussion is about implementing native D-BUS support in Ruby: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=38052001

On 1/25/07, Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd@sp...> wrote:
> You connect to an abstract socket by specifying the first byte of the path as
> '\0', unfortunately the ruby socket layer doesn't allow you to do this.. It
> gives you:
> ArgumentError: string contains null byte

If he's right, it may be enough to alter the sanity check somewhere and this would work?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=8597&group_id=426

In This Thread

Prev Next