ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#10157] Re: Including classes — Pit Capitain <pit@...>

Ola Bini schrieb:

9 messages 2007/02/01
[#10159] Re: Including classes — Pit Capitain <pit@...> 2007/02/01

Ola Bini schrieb:
[#10160] Re: Including classes — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/01

On Feb 1, 2007, at 7:16 AM, Pit Capitain wrote:
[#10161] Re: Including classes — Pit Capitain <pit@...> 2007/02/01

James Edward Gray II schrieb:
[#10162] Re: Including classes — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2007/02/01

On 2/1/07, Ola Bini <ola.bini@ki.se> wrote:
[#10163] Re: Including classes — _why <why@...> 2007/02/01

On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 10:58:52PM +0900, Austin Ziegler wrote:
[#10168] Re: Including classes — Daniel DeLorme <dan-ml@...42.com> 2007/02/02

Austin Ziegler wrote:
[#10173] Re: Including classes — gwtmp01@... 2007/02/02

[#10165] Re: Including classes — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2007/02/01

On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 06:49:55AM +0900, Ola Bini wrote:

[#10167] SVN revision corresponding to 1.8.5_p12? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>

Simple question: what SVN revision corresponds to the 1.8.5_p12 release?

4 messages 2007/02/02
[#10169] Re: SVN revision corresponding to 1.8.5_p12? — "Vincent Isambart" <vincent.isambart@...> 2007/02/02

Him
[#10170] Re: SVN revision corresponding to 1.8.5_p12? — "Vincent Isambart" <vincent.isambart@...> 2007/02/02

Hi,
[#10171] Re: SVN revision corresponding to 1.8.5_p12? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/02/02

Vincent Isambart wrote:

[#10172] Discrepancy between GetoptLong.new and documentation — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8384, was opened at 2007-02-02 10:06

1 message 2007/02/02

[#10174] math.c, acosh.h, domain_check, MS Windows - possible bug — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2007/02/02
[#10178] Re: math.c, acosh.h, domain_check, MS Windows - possible bug — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/02/03

Hi,

[#10185] Ruby 1.9: Why the change to the return values of #instance_variables? — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...>

I have been preparing a release of Transaction::Simple 1.4 and want to

4 messages 2007/02/03
[#10187] Re: Ruby 1.9: Why the change to the return values of #instance_variables? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/02/04

Hi,
[#10188] Re: Ruby 1.9: Why the change to the return values of #instance_variables? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/02/04

Hi,
[#10189] Re: Ruby 1.9: Why the change to the return values of #instance_variables? — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2007/02/04

On 2/3/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#10186] Reusing Ruby's tests via svn:externals — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>

Would there be any objection to JRuby including a few SVN externals

1 message 2007/02/03

[#10190] Added method ole_query_interface to WIN32OLE — <noreply@...>

Patches item #8437, was opened at 2007-02-05 11:35

1 message 2007/02/05

[#10193] String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...>

Hi,

41 messages 2007/02/05
[#10197] Re: String.ord — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/02/06

Hi,
[#10198] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#10199] Re: String.ord — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2007/02/06

David Flanagan wrote:
[#10200] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Daniel Berger wrote:
[#10208] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:
[#10213] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Nikolai Weibull wrote:
[#10215] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:
[#10216] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/07

Nikolai Weibull wrote:
[#10218] Re: String.ord — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/02/07

Quoting david@davidflanagan.com, on Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:10:52AM +0900:
[#10226] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/07

On 2/7/07, Sam Roberts <sroberts@uniserve.com> wrote:
[#10232] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/07

Nikolai Weibull wrote:
[#10234] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/07

On 2/7/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:
[#10235] Re: String.ord — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...> 2007/02/07

I have to agree with David here. All he is pointing out is that an
[#10237] Re: String.ord — "Matt Pattison" <matchbo@...> 2007/02/07

On 2/8/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:
[#10240] Re: String.ord — Gavin Kistner <gavin@...> 2007/02/08

On Feb 7, 2007, at 3:57 PM, Matt Pattison wrote:
[#10238] Re: String.ord — "Micah Wylde" <wyldeone@...> 2007/02/08

I'm not a contributor, but I am a user of ruby, and there is a
[#10241] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/08

On 2/8/07, Micah Wylde <wyldeone@gmail.com> wrote:
[#10242] Re: String.ord — Unknown <borg@...3.net> 2007/02/08

On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Micah Wylde wrote:
[#10243] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/08

On 2/8/07, Unknown <borg@uu3.net> wrote:
[#10225] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/07

On 2/7/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:
[#10207] Re: String.ord — dblack@... 2007/02/06

Hi --
[#10201] Re: String.ord — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/02/06

Hi,
[#10209] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#10212] Re: String.ord — dblack@... 2007/02/06

Hi --
[#10214] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#10217] Re: String.ord — dblack@... 2007/02/07

Hi --
[#10224] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/07

On 2/7/07, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#10229] Re: String.ord — dblack@... 2007/02/07

Hi --
[#10231] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/07

On 2/7/07, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#10219] Re: String.ord — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/02/07

Hi,
[#10228] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/07

On 2/7/07, Ola Bini <ola.bini@ki.se> wrote:
[#10233] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/07

Ola Bini wrote:
[#10248] Re: String.ord — Steven Lumos <steven@...> 2007/02/09

"Nikolai Weibull" <now@bitwi.se> writes:
[#10250] Re: String.ord — Unknown <borg@...3.net> 2007/02/09

[#10251] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/09

On 2/9/07, Steven Lumos <steven@lumos.us> wrote:
[#10275] Re: String.ord — mathew <meta@...> 2007/02/10

On 2/8/07, Steven Lumos <steven@lumos.us> wrote:
[#10277] Re: String.ord — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2007/02/10

On 2/10/07, mathew <meta@pobox.com> wrote:
[#10194] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/05

On 2/5/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:
[#10195] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/05

Nikolai Weibull wrote:
[#10202] Re: String.ord — Gavin Kistner <gavin@...> 2007/02/06

On Feb 5, 2007, at 3:54 PM, David Flanagan wrote:

[#10220] Can we add a link to ViewVC in the ruby-cvs commit mails? — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...>

Hello,

4 messages 2007/02/07
[#10283] Re: Can we add a link to ViewVC in the ruby-cvs commit mails? — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...> 2007/02/13

I noticed that the ruby-cvs mail now has links to ViewVC.
[#10221] Re: Can we add a link to ViewVC in the ruby-cvs commit mails? — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2007/02/07

Hi,
[#10222] Re: Can we add a link to ViewVC in the ruby-cvs commit mails? — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...> 2007/02/07

On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 17:10:00 +0900, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:

[#10223] Ruby/YARV thread question — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2007/02/07
[#10252] Re: Ruby/YARV thread question — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2007/02/09

Hi,

[#10230] Test::Unit::AutoRunner#parse_args bug, attributable to optparse documentation. — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...>

3 messages 2007/02/07
[#10239] Re: [PATCH] Test::Unit::AutoRunner#parse_args bug, attributable to optparse documentation. — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2007/02/08

Hi,
[#10244] Re: [PATCH] Test::Unit::AutoRunner#parse_args bug, attributable to optparse documentation. — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2007/02/08

On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 01:06:55PM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#10236] Build Problem — Andreas Hauser <andy-ruby-core@...>

Hoi,

1 message 2007/02/07

[#10245] Define text color in rdoc html — <noreply@...>

Patches item #8513, was opened at 2007-02-08 10:35

1 message 2007/02/08

[#10246] Why are Symbol#object_id and Symbol#to_i different? — "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@...>

On my system, it appears that the result of to_i is simply object_id / 10 f=

3 messages 2007/02/08
[#10247] Re: Why are Symbol#object_id and Symbol#to_i different? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/02/09

Hi,
[#10249] Re: Why are Symbol#object_id and Symbol#to_i different? — "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@...> 2007/02/09

Great, thanks!

[#10253] Module:constants returns unexpected result — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8537, was opened at 2007-02-09 17:23

2 messages 2007/02/09
[#10264] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8537 ] Module:constants returns unexpected result — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/02/09

On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 02:23:55AM +0900, noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:

[#10254] uninitialized variable in function rb_syswait() — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8538, was opened at 2007-02-09 17:25

4 messages 2007/02/09
[#10265] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8538 ] uninitialized variable in function rb_syswait() — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/02/09

On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 02:25:43AM +0900, noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
[#10272] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8538 ] uninitialized variable in function rb_syswait() — Unknown <borg@...3.net> 2007/02/10

[#10274] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8538 ] uninitialized variable in function rb_syswait() — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org> 2007/02/10

> > In C, static variables are default initialized to 0.

[#10255] String:upto loops forever if argument is modified inside block — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8539, was opened at 2007-02-09 17:27

3 messages 2007/02/09
[#10260] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8539 ] String:upto loops forever if argument is modified inside block — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...> 2007/02/09

On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 06:27:31PM +0100, noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
[#10261] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8539 ] String:upto loops forever if argument is modified inside block — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/02/09

> -----Original Message-----

[#10256] Unexpected behaviour if IO:write will be overwritten — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8540, was opened at 2007-02-09 17:29

2 messages 2007/02/09
[#10263] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8540 ] Unexpected behaviour if IO:write will be overwritten — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2007/02/09

noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:

[#10257] coredump when invoking Kernel:syscall — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8541, was opened at 2007-02-09 17:31

5 messages 2007/02/09
[#10267] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8541 ] coredump when invoking Kernel:syscall — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/02/09

On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 02:31:48AM +0900, noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
[#10278] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8541 ] coredump when invoking Kernel:syscall — Tadashi Saito <shiba@...2.accsnet.ne.jp> 2007/02/11

Hello all,
[#10282] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8541 ] coredump when invoking Kernel:syscall — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2007/02/12

Hi,
[#10285] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8541 ] coredump when invoking Kernel:syscall — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2007/02/13

At Sat, 10 Feb 2007 08:30:41 +0900,

[#10258] Unexpected exception when invoking Kernel:syscall — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8542, was opened at 2007-02-09 17:35

1 message 2007/02/09

[#10259] Segmentation fault: Ruby 1.8.5 Under VC++ express 2005 — "z wen" <zhimin.wen@...>

Hi

8 messages 2007/02/09
[#10266] Re: Segmentation fault: Ruby 1.8.5 Under VC++ express 2005 — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2007/02/09

Hell,
[#10268] Re: Segmentation fault: Ruby 1.8.5 Under VC++ express 2005 — Masaki Suketa <masaki.suketa@...> 2007/02/10

Hello,
[#10270] Re: Segmentation fault: Ruby 1.8.5 Under VC++ express 2005 — "z wen" <zhimin.wen@...> 2007/02/10

On 2/10/07, Masaki Suketa <masaki.suketa@nifty.ne.jp> wrote:
[#10317] Re: Segmentation fault: Ruby 1.8.5 Under VC++ express 2005 — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2007/02/15

Hello,
[#10319] Re: Segmentation fault: Ruby 1.8.5 Under VC++ express 2005 — Masaki Suketa <masaki.suketa@...> 2007/02/15

Hello,
[#10320] Re: Segmentation fault: Ruby 1.8.5 Under VC++ express 2005 — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2007/02/15

Hello,
[#10318] Re: Segmentation fault: Ruby 1.8.5 Under VC++ express 2005 — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2007/02/15

Hello,

[#10262] Limiting 卒卒 or popen subprocess time — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch)

Hi,

3 messages 2007/02/09
[#10273] Re: Limiting 卒卒 or popen subprocess time — "Simon Strandgaard" <neoneye@...> 2007/02/10

On 2/9/07, Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@danisch.de> wrote:
[#10271] Re: Limiting 卒卒 or popen subprocess time — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch) 2007/02/10

...found the solution by reading ruby sources:

[#10269] YAML::Omap loses entries, replacing them with random references — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8548, was opened at 2007-02-09 20:23

1 message 2007/02/10

[#10276] fastthread now default in ruby_1_8 — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>

Hi,

4 messages 2007/02/10
[#10308] Re: [ANN] fastthread now default in ruby_1_8 — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2007/02/14

On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 07:00 +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#10311] Re: [ANN] fastthread now default in ruby_1_8 — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2007/02/15

At Thu, 15 Feb 2007 07:31:27 +0900,
[#10315] Re: [ANN] fastthread now default in ruby_1_8 — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2007/02/15

On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 11:57 +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote:

[#10279] Singleton Inheritance? — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

I am in the process of converting Ruby Hacker's Guide to English.

2 messages 2007/02/11
[#10281] Re: Singleton Inheritance? — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/02/11

Quoting ceo@hawthorne-press.com, on Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 03:27:44AM +0900:

[#10280] Mistake in Singleton Image — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

Sorry the second chart was "ch_class_singleton.jpg" NOT

1 message 2007/02/11

[#10284] Can't seem to run tests? — "Farrel Lifson" <farrel.lifson@...>

Hi there,

5 messages 2007/02/13
[#10287] Re: Can't seem to run tests? — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...> 2007/02/13

On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 06:35:15AM +0100, Farrel Lifson wrote:
[#10292] Re: Can't seem to run tests? — Steven Lumos <steven@...> 2007/02/13

"Farrel Lifson" <farrel.lifson@gmail.com> writes:
[#10293] Re: Can't seem to run tests? — "Farrel Lifson" <farrel.lifson@...> 2007/02/13

On 13/02/07, Steven Lumos <steven@lumos.us> wrote:
[#10328] Re: Can't seem to run tests? — Steven Lumos <steven@...> 2007/02/15

"Farrel Lifson" <farrel.lifson@gmail.com> writes:

[#10286] gsub to replace small amount of content with a large amount causes original trailing text to repeat — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8592, was opened at 2007-02-12 22:26

1 message 2007/02/13

[#10288] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8597, was opened at 2007-02-13 16:10

12 messages 2007/02/13
[#10294] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8597 ] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/02/13

On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:10:37AM +0900, noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
[#10296] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8597 ] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/02/13

Hi,
[#10303] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8597 ] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/02/14

On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 08:38:50AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#10310] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8597 ] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/02/14

[#10314] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8597 ] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/02/15

Hi,
[#10327] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8597 ] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/02/15

On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 01:41:26PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#10360] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8597 ] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — Bram Senders <bram@...> 2007/02/17

On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:10:37AM +0900, noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
[#10361] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8597 ] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/02/18

Hi,
[#10362] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8597 ] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — Bram Senders <bram@...> 2007/02/18

On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 11:27:58AM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#10370] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8597 ] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/02/19

On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 06:25:30AM +0900, Bram Senders wrote:
[#10407] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8597 ] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/02/23

*ping*

[#10289] Communicating Ruby programs and processor choice — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>

Pardon this intrusion, as this is somewhat OT, but I need answers from

1 message 2007/02/13

[#10290] URI::Generic#userinfo — "Jonas Pfenniger" <zimbatm@...>

Hello,

9 messages 2007/02/13
[#10295] Re: [PATCH] URI::Generic#userinfo — mathew <meta@...> 2007/02/13

Those are not errors. Username and password are not allowed in HTTP
[#10297] Re: [PATCH] URI::Generic#userinfo — "Jonas Pfenniger" <zimbatm@...> 2007/02/14

2007/2/13, mathew <meta@pobox.com>:
[#10322] Re: [PATCH] URI::Generic#userinfo — mathew <meta@...> 2007/02/15

On 2/14/07, Jonas Pfenniger <zimbatm@oree.ch> wrote:
[#10333] Re: [PATCH] URI::Generic#userinfo — "Jonas Pfenniger" <zimbatm@...> 2007/02/16

2007/2/15, mathew <meta@pobox.com>:
[#10298] Re: [PATCH] URI::Generic#userinfo — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...> 2007/02/14

Hello Jonas,
[#10299] Re: [PATCH] URI::Generic#userinfo — "Jonas Pfenniger" <zimbatm@...> 2007/02/14

2007/2/14, Zev Blut <rubyzbibd@ubit.com>:
[#10312] Re: [PATCH] URI::Generic#userinfo — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2007/02/15

At Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:47:23 +0900,
[#10316] Re: [PATCH] URI::Generic#userinfo — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2007/02/15

At Thu, 15 Feb 2007 11:58:24 +0900,

[#10291] debug.rb does not work in some cases? — Martin Krauskopf <Martin.Krauskopf@...>

Hi,

1 message 2007/02/13

[#10300] rb_class_real Question? — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

OK - Stupid Question: What (in english prose) is this line actually doing???

2 messages 2007/02/14
[#10309] Re: rb_class_real Question? — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...> 2007/02/14

On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 06:42:04PM +0100, Charles Thornton wrote:

[#10301] rb_class_real — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

OK - I look at again --- I seem to remember it was confusing the

2 messages 2007/02/14
[#10304] Re: rb_class_real — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/02/14

Hi,

[#10302] RHG Translation project — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

Sorry --- But this code is driving me a little crazy

1 message 2007/02/14

[#10305] character codes in regular expressions? — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch)

Hi,

2 messages 2007/02/14
[#10306] Re: character codes in regular expressions? — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/02/14

> How would one write a regular expression for matching any character with

[#10307] fastthread: rb_bug() due to stale wait queue entries — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8663, was opened at 2007-02-14 17:25

1 message 2007/02/14

[#10313] Code frozen for Ruby 1.8.6 — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>

Soft code freeze for Ruby 1.8.6 has just begun. I'll make a

1 message 2007/02/15

[#10321] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8676, was opened at 2007-02-15 10:09

11 messages 2007/02/15
[#11160] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8676 ] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/05/12

Hi,
[#11161] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8676 ] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2007/05/12

On 5/12/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#11162] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8676 ] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/05/13

Hi,
[#11164] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8676 ] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2007/05/13

On 13/05/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#11182] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8676 ] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2007/05/16

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#11163] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8676 ] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/05/13

On 5/12/07, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
[#11181] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8676 ] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2007/05/16

Nikolai Weibull wrote:
[#11183] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8676 ] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/05/16

Hi,
[#11184] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8676 ] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2007/05/16

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#11186] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8676 ] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — gus <gus@...> 2007/05/16

On 5/16/07 4:58 AM, "Daniel Berger" <djberg96@gmail.com> wrote:

[#10323] Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

Some of the Ruby code used by TextMate makes use of xmlrpc/

31 messages 2007/02/15
[#10324] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/02/15

> -----Original Message-----
[#10326] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/15

On Feb 15, 2007, at 1:29 PM, Berger, Daniel wrote:
[#10337] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

On Feb 15, 2007, at 1:33 PM, James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#10339] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — zdennis <zdennis@...> 2007/02/16

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[#10340] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

On Feb 16, 2007, at 9:33 AM, zdennis wrote:
[#10375] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/20

On Feb 16, 2007, at 7:49 AM, James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#10376] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2007/02/20

At Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:33:08 +0900,
[#10378] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/20

On Feb 20, 2007, at 7:50 AM, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#10379] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2007/02/20

At Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:55:42 +0900,
[#10380] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/20

On Feb 20, 2007, at 8:46 AM, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#10391] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2007/02/21

Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#10392] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/21

On Feb 21, 2007, at 4:25 PM, Michael Neumann wrote:
[#10400] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2007/02/23

At Thu, 22 Feb 2007 07:25:21 +0900,
[#10403] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/23

On Feb 22, 2007, at 10:27 PM, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#10342] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

While I am complaining about xmlrpc, we have another issue. It's
[#10343] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — Alex Young <alex@...> 2007/02/16

James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#10344] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

On Feb 16, 2007, at 12:08 PM, Alex Young wrote:
[#10346] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/02/16

On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 04:39:08AM +0900, James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#10348] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

On Feb 16, 2007, at 4:17 PM, Sam Roberts wrote:
[#10355] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/02/17

Quoting james@grayproductions.net, on Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 07:45:44AM +0900:
[#10347] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — Alex Young <alex@...> 2007/02/16

James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#10349] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

On Feb 16, 2007, at 4:27 PM, Alex Young wrote:
[#10352] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

On Feb 16, 2007, at 5:08 PM, James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#10356] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — Alex Young <alex@...> 2007/02/17

James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#10377] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/20

On Feb 17, 2007, at 2:59 AM, Alex Young wrote:
[#10382] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/02/20

On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 10:53:20PM +0900, James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#10383] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/20

On Feb 20, 2007, at 3:29 PM, Sam Roberts wrote:
[#10401] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2007/02/23

OK, revised patch committed.
[#10350] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2007/02/16

On Feb 16, 2007, at 09:44, James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#10351] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

On Feb 16, 2007, at 5:15 PM, Eric Hodel wrote:

[#10325] Unexpected behavior of splat (*) in parallel assignment — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8679, was opened at 2007-02-15 14:29

2 messages 2007/02/15
[#10353] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8679 ] Unexpected behavior of splat (*) in parallel assignment — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2007/02/16

[#10329] open-uri proxy authentication for 1.8.6 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

I'd like to see open-uri backported from trunk to ruby_1_8. I wasn't

2 messages 2007/02/16
[#10332] Re: open-uri proxy authentication for 1.8.6 — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2007/02/16

At Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:52:51 +0900,

[#10334] make Test::Unit output more Emacs friendly format — Kouhei Sutou <kou@...>

Hi,

6 messages 2007/02/16
[#10335] Re: [PATCH] make Test::Unit output more Emacs friendly format — Vincent Fourmond <vincent.fourmond@9online.fr> 2007/02/16

Kouhei Sutou wrote:
[#10336] Re: [PATCH] make Test::Unit output more Emacs friendly format — Kouhei Sutou <kou@...> 2007/02/16

Hi,
[#10338] Re: [PATCH] make Test::Unit output more Emacs friendly format — Vincent Fourmond <vincent.fourmond@9online.fr> 2007/02/16

Kouhei Sutou wrote:
[#10365] Re: [PATCH] make Test::Unit output more Emacs friendly format — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/02/19

Quoting kou@cozmixng.org, on Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 09:37:19PM +0900:
[#10367] Re: [PATCH] make Test::Unit output more Emacs friendly format — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...> 2007/02/19

On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:54:03 +0900, Sam Roberts <sroberts@uniserve.com>

[#10341] matz/knu: Requesting committer privileges to add Win32 NTLM authentication to net/http — "Justin Bailey" <jgbailey@...>

Matz, Mr. Musha, and All,

3 messages 2007/02/16
[#10386] Re: matz/knu: Requesting committer privileges to add Win32 NTLM authentication to net/http — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2007/02/21

It sounds fine to me and I have no objection to putting it into 1.8
[#10390] Re: matz/knu: Requesting committer privileges to add Win32 NTLM authentication to net/http — "Justin Bailey" <jgbailey@...> 2007/02/21

Thanks for your reply below - I will refactor the names and get a patch

[#10354] Add option to Test::Unit::Assertions#assert_raise to allow subclasses — <noreply@...>

Patches item #8716, was opened at 2007-02-16 19:24

1 message 2007/02/17

[#10357] Ruby 1.8.6 preview1 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>

Hi,

4 messages 2007/02/17
[#10358] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 preview1 has been released — Lyle Johnson <lyle.johnson@...> 2007/02/17

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[#10359] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 preview1 has been released — Lyle Johnson <lyle.johnson@...> 2007/02/17

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[#10384] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 preview1 has been released — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2007/02/21

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:

[#10364] Question about ToDo file — Eric Stratmann <bobwhoops@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2007/02/18
[#10368] Re: Question about ToDo file — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/02/19

Hi,

[#10366] wrong syscall name in error message for #peeraddr — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...>

1 message 2007/02/19

[#10369] Sandbox? — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>

Hi,

1 message 2007/02/19

[#10371] 1.8.6p1 warning from autorunner.rb — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>

Hi all,

1 message 2007/02/20

[#10372] Stateful I/O interface — "Tony Arcieri" <tony@...>

Has anyone ever suggested adding a stateful I/O multiplexing interface which

7 messages 2007/02/20
[#10374] Re: Stateful I/O interface — "Tony Arcieri" <tony@...> 2007/02/20

Yes, that's more of an I/O framework, and it's built around Kernel#select at
[#10395] Re: Stateful I/O interface — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2007/02/22

On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 11:24:52AM +0900, Tony Arcieri wrote:
[#10396] Re: Stateful I/O interface — "Tony Arcieri" <tony@...> 2007/02/23

On 2/22/07, Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> wrote:
[#10398] Re: Stateful I/O interface — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...> 2007/02/23

On 2/22/07, Tony Arcieri <tony@clickcaster.com> wrote:
[#10399] Re: Stateful I/O interface — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...> 2007/02/23

On 2/22/07, Tony Arcieri <tony@clickcaster.com> wrote:
[#10405] Re: Stateful I/O interface — "Tony Arcieri" <tony@...> 2007/02/23

I'm looking primarily for scalability improvements in terms of handling

[#10381] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 preview1 has been released - WEBrick error — mathew <meta@...>

Built and tested OK, except for 1 error:

1 message 2007/02/20

[#10385] Services of ruby-lang.org will be stopped — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2007/02/21
[#10394] Re: [ANN] Services of ruby-lang.org will be stopped — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2007/02/22

Hi,

[#10387] vendor_ruby support — Marcus Rueckert <mrueckert@...>

Hi,

6 messages 2007/02/21
[#10388] Re: [PATCH] vendor_ruby support — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/02/21

Hi,
[#10389] Re: [PATCH] vendor_ruby support — Marcus Rueckert <mrueckert@...> 2007/02/21

hi,
[#10417] Re: [PATCH] vendor_ruby support — "Alexey I. Froloff" <sir_raorn@...> 2007/02/24

* Marcus Rueckert <mrueckert@> [070221 17:59]:
[#10419] Re: [PATCH] vendor_ruby support — Marcus Rueckert <mrueckert@...> 2007/02/24

On 2007-02-25 06:41:29 +0900, Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
[#10421] Re: [PATCH] vendor_ruby support — "Alexey I. Froloff" <sir_raorn@...> 2007/02/25

* Marcus Rueckert <mrueckert@> [070225 02:11]:

[#10393] is Array#pack supposed to truncate integers in 1.9? — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...>

1 message 2007/02/21

[#10397] Ruby 1.8.5 not installing a working digest.rb on MacOSX — "Ryan Waldron" <ryan.waldron@...>

While trying to install a Rails app on my Mac (10.4 Tiger), I ran into

5 messages 2007/02/23
[#10402] Re: Ruby 1.8.5 not installing a working digest.rb on MacOSX — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2007/02/23

At Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:44:01 +0900,
[#10404] Re: Ruby 1.8.5 not installing a working digest.rb on MacOSX — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/02/23

Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#10409] Re: Ruby 1.8.5 not installing a working digest.rb on MacOSX — "Ryan Waldron" <ryan.waldron@...> 2007/02/23

On 2/22/07, Akinori MUSHA <knu@idaemons.org> wrote:
[#10410] Re: Ruby 1.8.5 not installing a working digest.rb on MacOSX — Steven Lumos <steven@...> 2007/02/23

Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@qwest.com> writes:

[#10406] Singleton Class Creation Differences (rb_singleton_class() & rb_define_class_id() ) — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

While Looking closely at Singleton Creation, it became obvious that

1 message 2007/02/23

[#10408] TypeError in irb tab completion — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8841, was opened at 2007-02-23 15:21

1 message 2007/02/23

[#10411] preview2 delayed — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>

Hi,

1 message 2007/02/24

[#10412] FlashGet errors with One-Click Ruby — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8847, was opened at 2007-02-24 09:41

1 message 2007/02/24

[#10413] Support for multiple-files breakpoint-management with Emacs — Martin Nordholts <enselic@...>

Hello!

5 messages 2007/02/24
[#10415] Re: [patch] Support for multiple-files breakpoint-management with Emacs — Martin Nordholts <enselic@...> 2007/02/24

Sorry for misformatting. This time it should be OK (enclosed in
[#10418] Re: [patch] Support for multiple-files breakpoint-management with Emacs — Martin Nordholts <enselic@...> 2007/02/24

It appears as if the debugger doesn't support 'b file.rb:25', but it
[#10424] Re: [patch] Support for multiple-files breakpoint-management with Emacs — Martin Krauskopf <Martin.Krauskopf@...> 2007/02/26

Martin Nordholts wrote:
[#10425] Re: [patch] Support for multiple-files breakpoint-management with Emacs — Martin Nordholts <enselic@...> 2007/02/26

Ah ok, so you already fixed it, but by patching debug.rb instead?

[#10414] Ruby 1.8.6 preview2 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>

Hi,

10 messages 2007/02/24
[#10426] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 preview2 has been released — "Daniel Berger" <djberg96@...> 2007/02/26

On 2/24/07, Akinori MUSHA <knu@idaemons.org> wrote:
[#10427] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 preview2 has been released — "Ryan Waldron" <ryan.waldron@...> 2007/02/26

Beta versions of rake from 0.7.1.5 on no longer rely on
[#10428] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 preview2 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2007/02/26

At Mon, 26 Feb 2007 22:37:37 +0900,
[#10435] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 preview2 has been released — Jim Weirich <jim@...> 2007/02/27

Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#10436] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 preview2 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2007/02/27

At Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:44:46 +0900,
[#10416] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 preview2 has been released — "Lyle Johnson" <lyle.johnson@...> 2007/02/24

On 2/24/07, Akinori MUSHA <knu@idaemons.org> wrote:
[#10439] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 preview2 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2007/02/27

At Sun, 25 Feb 2007 01:14:27 +0900,
[#10432] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 preview2 has been released — "David Symonds" <dsymonds@...> 2007/02/27

On 2/25/07, Akinori MUSHA <knu@idaemons.org> wrote:
[#10440] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 preview2 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2007/02/27

At Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:43:19 +0900,

[#10420] Test::Unit shows result even if interrupted — Kouhei Sutou <kou@...>

Hi,

7 messages 2007/02/25
[#15286] Re: [PATCH] Test::Unit shows result even if interrupted — Steven Lumos <steven@...> 2008/01/29

Kouhei Sutou <kou@cozmixng.org> writes:
[#15296] Re: [PATCH] Test::Unit shows result even if interrupted — Kouhei Sutou <kou@...> 2008/01/29

Hi,
[#15299] Re: [PATCH] Test::Unit shows result even if interrupted — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/01/29

> How do you do your writing code and running test cycle?
[#15310] Re: [PATCH] Test::Unit shows result even if interrupted — Kouhei Sutou <kou@...> 2008/01/30

Hi,
[#15313] Re: [PATCH] Test::Unit shows result even if interrupted — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/01/30

Kouhei Sutou wrote:
[#15138] Re: [PATCH] Test::Unit shows result even if interrupted — Kouhei Sutou <kou@...> 2008/01/19

Hi,

[#10422] Possible problem submitting patch #8513 — Luther <lutherfire@...>

On 2007-2-8, I submitted a patch on rubyforge. Two days later, I

2 messages 2007/02/26
[#10423] Re: Possible problem submitting patch #8513 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2007/02/26

On Feb 25, 2007, at 21:36, Luther wrote:

[#10429] YAML fails to load a Hash containing a Pathname — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8886, was opened at 2007-02-26 14:42

2 messages 2007/02/26
[#10431] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8886 ] YAML fails to load a Hash containing a Pathname — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2007/02/26

noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:

[#10430] Problem with on-auto-image-based dlls on cygwin (--enable-auto-image-base) — "Bjarne Christiansen" <bjarne.christiansen@...>

Hi,

1 message 2007/02/26

[#10433] openssl segmentation fault — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8903, was opened at 2007-02-27 01:08

2 messages 2007/02/27
[#10444] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8903 ] openssl segmentation fault — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/02/27

On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:08:44AM +0900, noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:

[#10434] Request for more thorough introspective documentation — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8906, was opened at 2007-02-27 05:15

1 message 2007/02/27

[#10437] MIME decoding confused by non-MIME characters — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>

Could someone who has bleeding-edge Ruby installed please test the

6 messages 2007/02/27
[#10451] Re: MIME decoding confused by non-MIME characters — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2007/02/28

Brian Candler wrote:
[#10455] Re: MIME decoding confused by non-MIME characters — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/02/28

On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 09:18:06PM +0900, Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
[#10456] Re: MIME decoding confused by non-MIME characters — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2007/02/28

Sam Roberts wrote:
[#10459] Re: MIME decoding confused by non-MIME characters — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/03/01

On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 07:52:08AM +0900, Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
[#10441] Re: MIME decoding confused by non-MIME characters — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2007/02/27

On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 09:20:56AM +0000, Brian Candler wrote:

[#10438] rdoc for Kernel#select broken? — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>

On the two systems I've tried (one 1.8.4/Ubuntu, one 1.8.5/CentOS), the

1 message 2007/02/27

[#10442] Latest Update to RHG — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

I am releasing the lastest version of the Ruby Hacker's Guide.

7 messages 2007/02/27
[#10452] Re: Latest Update to RHG — Mathieu Blondel <mblondel@...> 2007/02/28

Hi,
[#10453] Re: Latest Update to RHG -- — Charles Thornton <ceo@...> 2007/02/28

[#10454] Re: Latest Update to RHG -- — Mathieu Blondel <mblondel@...> 2007/02/28

Charles Thornton wrote:
[#10470] Re: Latest Update to RHG -- — Charles Thornton <ceo@...> 2007/03/01

Mathieu Blondel wrote:
[#10472] Re: Latest Update to RHG -- — Mathieu Blondel <mblondel@...> 2007/03/01

Charles Thornton wrote:
[#10486] Re: Latest Update to RHG -- — Charles Thornton <ceo@...> 2007/03/02

Mathieu Blondel wrote:

[#10443] ruby1.8 case-insensitive matches fail when using hex escapes — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...>

1 message 2007/02/27

[#10445] PATCH: Emacs support for 'ruby-debug' (rdebug) : rdebug.el — Martin Nordholts <enselic@...>

Hello,

5 messages 2007/02/27
[#10447] (new) PATCH: Emacs support for 'ruby-debug' (rdebug) — Martin Nordholts <enselic@...> 2007/02/27

This is a patch against trunk that also changes ./misc/README. The patch
[#10482] Re: (new) PATCH: Emacs support for 'ruby-debug' (rdebug) — Martin Nordholts <enselic@...> 2007/03/02

If I want someone to look at the patch and consider it for includsion,
[#10497] Re: (new) PATCH: Emacs support for 'ruby-debug' (rdebug) — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...> 2007/03/05

On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 00:28:03 +0900, Martin Nordholts <enselic@gmail.com>
[#10539] Re: (new) PATCH: Emacs support for 'ruby-debug' (rdebug) — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2007/03/10

At Wed, 28 Feb 2007 08:39:09 +0900,

[#10446] Potential RCR?: Array#join with block — "Farrel Lifson" <farrel.lifson@...>

Does anyone think Array#join with a block is a potential RCR?

3 messages 2007/02/27
[#10448] Re: Potential RCR?: Array#join with block — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2007/02/28

On 2/27/07, Farrel Lifson <farrel.lifson@gmail.com> wrote:
[#10449] Re: Potential RCR?: Array#join with block — "Farrel Lifson" <farrel.lifson@...> 2007/02/28

On 28/02/07, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:

[#10450] Subtle difference between m { |arg| do_something(arg) } and m(&method(:do_something)) — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org>

[~/tmp]% cat test.rb

1 message 2007/02/28

[#10457] Autoprefixing C:\ for File.expand_path? — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

Ruby 1.8.5

1 message 2007/02/28

Ruby/YARV thread question

From: Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>
Date: 2007-02-07 14:48:29 UTC
List: ruby-core #10223 
Hi,

In thread.c, three YARV thread models are described. Which models will be
used in Ruby/YARV? If model 2 (native threads with Giant VM lock) is used,
can I use blocking system calls without releasing the Giant VM lock before?
Probably not. I'm trying to understand how the future Ruby will behave in
this respect.

Best regards,

  Michael

In This Thread

Prev Next