[#10193] String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...>

Hi,

41 messages 2007/02/05
[#10197] Re: String.ord — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/02/06

Hi,

[#10198] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#10199] Re: String.ord — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2007/02/06

David Flanagan wrote:

[#10200] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#10208] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10213] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10215] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10216] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/07

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10288] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8597, was opened at 2007-02-13 16:10

12 messages 2007/02/13

[#10321] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8676, was opened at 2007-02-15 10:09

11 messages 2007/02/15

[#10323] Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

Some of the Ruby code used by TextMate makes use of xmlrpc/

31 messages 2007/02/15
[#10324] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/02/15

> -----Original Message-----

[#10326] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/15

On Feb 15, 2007, at 1:29 PM, Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#10342] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

While I am complaining about xmlrpc, we have another issue. It's

[#10343] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — Alex Young <alex@...> 2007/02/16

James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#10344] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

On Feb 16, 2007, at 12:08 PM, Alex Young wrote:

Re: Ruby 1.8.5 not installing a working digest.rb on MacOSX

From: "Ryan Waldron" <ryan.waldron@...>
Date: 2007-02-23 21:28:11 UTC
List: ruby-core #10409
On 2/22/07, Akinori MUSHA <knu@idaemons.org> wrote:
> At Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:44:01 +0900,
> Ryan Waldron wrote:

> > Now, when I look in /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/digest.rb, I
> > find these lines:
> >
> > require 'digest.so'
> >
> > module Digest
> > autoload "SHA256", "digest/sha2.so"
> > autoload "SHA384", "digest/sha2.so"
> > autoload "SHA512", "digest/sha2.so"
> > ...
>
> The piece of code does not exist in the 1.8.5 release, so I presume
> you are using a snapshot of the ruby_1_8 branch.  Try either
> 1.8.6-preview1 or the latest ruby_1_8 snapshot which has a workaround
> applied.

Indeed I was, so I grabbed the latest ruby_1_8 snapshot, and the
problem has gone away.  Thanks very much for the explanation below
(snipped) about .so vs .bundle!

In This Thread