[#10193] String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...>

Hi,

41 messages 2007/02/05
[#10197] Re: String.ord — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/02/06

Hi,

[#10198] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#10199] Re: String.ord — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2007/02/06

David Flanagan wrote:

[#10200] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#10208] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10213] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10215] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10216] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/07

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10288] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8597, was opened at 2007-02-13 16:10

12 messages 2007/02/13

[#10321] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8676, was opened at 2007-02-15 10:09

11 messages 2007/02/15

[#10323] Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

Some of the Ruby code used by TextMate makes use of xmlrpc/

31 messages 2007/02/15
[#10324] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/02/15

> -----Original Message-----

[#10326] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/15

On Feb 15, 2007, at 1:29 PM, Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#10342] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

While I am complaining about xmlrpc, we have another issue. It's

[#10343] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — Alex Young <alex@...> 2007/02/16

James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#10344] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

On Feb 16, 2007, at 12:08 PM, Alex Young wrote:

Re: [PATCH] URI::Generic#userinfo

From: mathew <meta@...>
Date: 2007-02-15 18:47:24 UTC
List: ruby-core #10322
On 2/14/07, Jonas Pfenniger <zimbatm@oree.ch> wrote:
> 2007/2/13, mathew <meta@pobox.com>:
> > Those are not errors. Username and password are not allowed in HTTP
> > URIs.
>
> Right, but since it seems handled by ruby's URI, why not make it
> completely right ?

I feel like there's some strange new usage of the term "right" that
I'm not privy to.

If we're going to make the URI class accept invalid URIs so long as
they can be parsed generically, then the patch needs some more work:

uri = URI("mailto://www.example.com/")
URI::InvalidComponentError: unrecognised opaque part for mailtoURL:
        from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/uri/mailto.rb:127:in `initialize'
        from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/uri/common.rb:484:in `parse'
        from /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/uri/common.rb:604:in `URI'
        from (irb):5
        from :0



mathew
-- 
<URL:http://www.pobox.com/~meta/>

In This Thread