[#10193] String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...>

Hi,

41 messages 2007/02/05
[#10197] Re: String.ord — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/02/06

Hi,

[#10198] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#10199] Re: String.ord — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2007/02/06

David Flanagan wrote:

[#10200] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#10208] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10213] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10215] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10216] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/07

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10288] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8597, was opened at 2007-02-13 16:10

12 messages 2007/02/13

[#10321] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8676, was opened at 2007-02-15 10:09

11 messages 2007/02/15

[#10323] Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

Some of the Ruby code used by TextMate makes use of xmlrpc/

31 messages 2007/02/15
[#10324] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/02/15

> -----Original Message-----

[#10326] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/15

On Feb 15, 2007, at 1:29 PM, Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#10342] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

While I am complaining about xmlrpc, we have another issue. It's

[#10343] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — Alex Young <alex@...> 2007/02/16

James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#10344] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

On Feb 16, 2007, at 12:08 PM, Alex Young wrote:

Re: Trouble with xmlrpc

From: James Edward Gray II <james@...>
Date: 2007-02-20 14:50:21 UTC
List: ruby-core #10380
On Feb 20, 2007, at 8:46 AM, Akinori MUSHA wrote:

> At Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:55:42 +0900,
> James Edward Gray II wrote:
>> On Feb 20, 2007, at 7:50 AM, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
>>
>>> At Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:33:08 +0900,
>>> James Edward Gray II wrote:
>>>> On Feb 16, 2007, at 7:49 AM, James Edward Gray II wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Below I will provide a patch against the ruby_1_8 branch.  It
>>>>> should also be applied to trunk and I can provide that patch if
>>>>> needed.
>>>>
>>>> Was there anything wrong with this patch?  If not, can we please
>>>> apply it?
>>>
>>> What does the maintainer say about it?  Is he irresponsive these  
>>> days?
>>
>> Do I need to try emailing him off this list?  Can anyone tell me who
>> maintains the library?
>
> Note the To: field in my mails. :)
>
> Let me wait for a couple days (~48 hours) for his response.  It may be
> ususually short for a maintainer timeout, but I'd like to get this
> into the second (and probably the last) preview release.

Thank you for all your help.

James Edward Gray II

In This Thread