[#10193] String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...>

Hi,

41 messages 2007/02/05
[#10197] Re: String.ord — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/02/06

Hi,

[#10198] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#10199] Re: String.ord — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2007/02/06

David Flanagan wrote:

[#10200] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#10208] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10213] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10215] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10216] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/07

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10288] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8597, was opened at 2007-02-13 16:10

12 messages 2007/02/13

[#10321] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8676, was opened at 2007-02-15 10:09

11 messages 2007/02/15

[#10323] Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

Some of the Ruby code used by TextMate makes use of xmlrpc/

31 messages 2007/02/15
[#10324] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/02/15

> -----Original Message-----

[#10326] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/15

On Feb 15, 2007, at 1:29 PM, Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#10342] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

While I am complaining about xmlrpc, we have another issue. It's

[#10343] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — Alex Young <alex@...> 2007/02/16

James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#10344] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

On Feb 16, 2007, at 12:08 PM, Alex Young wrote:

[PATCH] make Test::Unit output more Emacs friendly format

From: Kouhei Sutou <kou@...>
Date: 2007-02-16 12:37:19 UTC
List: ruby-core #10334
Hi,

Is there any reason why backtraces outputted by Test::Unit
are indented? If there are any strong reason, I want
Test::Unit to stop indenting.

I'm running Test::Unit in Emacs's *compilation* mode. In
this mode, Emacs automatically links the following formatted
line:

  FILE_NAME:LINE_NO:ANY_MESSAGE

On Emacs, we can easily jump to the FILE_NAME at LINE_NO by
C-x `. This function is very useful for debugging and helps
me to do test driven development.

I also requested this output format to RSpec and the request
was accepted. I hope that Test::Unit accepts this request
too.

I attach a patch to stop indenting.


Thanks,
--
kou

Attachments (1)

ruby-test-unit-more-emacs-friendly.diff (612 Bytes, text/x-diff)
Index: lib/test/unit/error.rb
===================================================================
--- lib/test/unit/error.rb	(revision 11762)
+++ lib/test/unit/error.rb	(working copy)
@@ -43,8 +43,8 @@
 
       # Returns a verbose version of the error description.
       def long_display
-        backtrace = filter_backtrace(@exception.backtrace).join("\n    ")
-        "Error:\n#@test_name:\n#{message}\n    #{backtrace}"
+        backtrace = filter_backtrace(@exception.backtrace).join("\n")
+        "Error:\n#@test_name:\n#{message}\n#{backtrace}"
       end
 
       # Overridden to return long_display.

In This Thread

Prev Next