[#10193] String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...>

Hi,

41 messages 2007/02/05
[#10197] Re: String.ord — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/02/06

Hi,

[#10198] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#10199] Re: String.ord — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2007/02/06

David Flanagan wrote:

[#10200] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#10208] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10213] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10215] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10216] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/07

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10288] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8597, was opened at 2007-02-13 16:10

12 messages 2007/02/13

[#10321] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8676, was opened at 2007-02-15 10:09

11 messages 2007/02/15

[#10323] Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

Some of the Ruby code used by TextMate makes use of xmlrpc/

31 messages 2007/02/15
[#10324] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/02/15

> -----Original Message-----

[#10326] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/15

On Feb 15, 2007, at 1:29 PM, Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#10342] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

While I am complaining about xmlrpc, we have another issue. It's

[#10343] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — Alex Young <alex@...> 2007/02/16

James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#10344] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

On Feb 16, 2007, at 12:08 PM, Alex Young wrote:

Re: Can't seem to run tests?

From: Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...>
Date: 2007-02-13 10:24:24 UTC
List: ruby-core #10287
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 06:35:15AM +0100, Farrel Lifson wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
> I'm not sure if this is the correct list to ask this (let me know and
> I'll scoot off to ruby-talk) but I'm having some issues with the
> running make test-all with the ruby source. I'd like to start
> experimenting with an idea I have for an RCR. The source (r11708)
> compiles fine, but make test has 44 failures and make test-all doesn't
> run anything at all:
> farrel@nicodemus ~/Projects/ruby $ make test-all
> ./miniruby  ./runruby.rb --extout=.ext -- "./test/runner.rb"
> --basedir="./test" --runner=console
> "./ruby ./test/runner.rb --basedir=./test --runner=console"
> Loaded suite .
> Started
> 
> Finished in 0.000201 seconds.
> 
> 0 tests, 0 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors
> 
> Is there another make directive I should be using?
make test. But takes forever to complete. And you probably get ton of
errors.
With 1.9 you couldn't expect all works. make install-doc is because rdoc
is broken.
Now I look why is singleton broken.



In This Thread