[#10193] String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...>

Hi,

41 messages 2007/02/05
[#10197] Re: String.ord — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/02/06

Hi,

[#10198] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#10199] Re: String.ord — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2007/02/06

David Flanagan wrote:

[#10200] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#10208] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10213] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10215] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10216] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/07

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10288] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8597, was opened at 2007-02-13 16:10

12 messages 2007/02/13

[#10321] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8676, was opened at 2007-02-15 10:09

11 messages 2007/02/15

[#10323] Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

Some of the Ruby code used by TextMate makes use of xmlrpc/

31 messages 2007/02/15
[#10324] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/02/15

> -----Original Message-----

[#10326] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/15

On Feb 15, 2007, at 1:29 PM, Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#10342] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

While I am complaining about xmlrpc, we have another issue. It's

[#10343] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — Alex Young <alex@...> 2007/02/16

James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#10344] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

On Feb 16, 2007, at 12:08 PM, Alex Young wrote:

Re: Ruby 1.8.6 preview2 has been released

From: "Ryan Waldron" <ryan.waldron@...>
Date: 2007-02-26 13:37:37 UTC
List: ruby-core #10427
Beta versions of rake from 0.7.1.5 on no longer rely on
fu_check_options (b/c it was always supposed to be internal only):

http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rake-devel/2006-October/000243.html

I stumbled over this a few weeks ago.  There will certainly be some
anguished cries, though, amongst people who haven't upgraded,
especially if the non-broken version of rake remains in beta when the
1.8.6 release goes official.

On 2/26/07, Daniel Berger <djberg96@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/24/07, Akinori MUSHA <knu@idaemons.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am pleased to announce that the second preview of Ruby 1.8.6 has
> > been released.  The new version of Ruby includes many bug fixes,
> > feature enhancements and some performance improvements since 1.8.5
> > while maintaining stability and backward compatibility with the
> > previous release to a high degree.
>
> It looks like you've altered fu_check_options in fileutils.rb, which
> breaks rake 0.7.1. Be prepared for howls from the rails community.
>
> djberge@imperator:~/workspace/ruby_test> rake test_array --trace
> (in /home/djberge/workspace/ruby_test)
> ** Invoke test_array (first_time)
> ** Execute test_array
> rake aborted!
> wrong number of arguments (3 for 2)
> /opt/test/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.1/lib/rake.rb:725:in
> `fu_check_options'
> /opt/test/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.1/lib/rake.rb:725:in `sh'
> /opt/test/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.1/lib/rake.rb:812:in `sh'
> /opt/test/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.1/lib/rake.rb:747:in `ruby'
> /opt/test/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.1/lib/rake.rb:812:in `ruby'
> /opt/test/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.1/lib/rake/testtask.rb:117:in `define'
> /opt/test/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.1/lib/rake.rb:831:in `verbose'
> /opt/test/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.1/lib/rake/testtask.rb:102:in `define'
> /opt/test/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.1/lib/rake.rb:387:in `call'
> /opt/test/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.1/lib/rake.rb:387:in `execute'
> /opt/test/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.1/lib/rake.rb:387:in `each'
> /opt/test/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.1/lib/rake.rb:387:in `execute'
> /opt/test/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.1/lib/rake.rb:357:in `invoke'
> /opt/test/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.1/lib/rake.rb:350:in `synchronize'
> /opt/test/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.1/lib/rake.rb:350:in `invoke'
> /opt/test/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.1/lib/rake.rb:1906:in `run'
> /opt/test/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.1/lib/rake.rb:1906:in `each'
> /opt/test/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.1/lib/rake.rb:1906:in `run'
> /opt/test/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.1/bin/rake:7
> /opt/test/bin/rake:16:in `load'
> /opt/test/bin/rake:16
>
> Regards,
>
> Dan
>
>

In This Thread