[#10193] String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...>

Hi,

41 messages 2007/02/05
[#10197] Re: String.ord — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/02/06

Hi,

[#10198] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#10199] Re: String.ord — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2007/02/06

David Flanagan wrote:

[#10200] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#10208] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10213] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10215] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:

[#10216] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/07

Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#10288] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8597, was opened at 2007-02-13 16:10

12 messages 2007/02/13

[#10321] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8676, was opened at 2007-02-15 10:09

11 messages 2007/02/15

[#10323] Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

Some of the Ruby code used by TextMate makes use of xmlrpc/

31 messages 2007/02/15
[#10324] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/02/15

> -----Original Message-----

[#10326] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/15

On Feb 15, 2007, at 1:29 PM, Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#10342] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

While I am complaining about xmlrpc, we have another issue. It's

[#10343] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — Alex Young <alex@...> 2007/02/16

James Edward Gray II wrote:

[#10344] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

On Feb 16, 2007, at 12:08 PM, Alex Young wrote:

Re: Can't seem to run tests?

From: "Farrel Lifson" <farrel.lifson@...>
Date: 2007-02-13 19:03:17 UTC
List: ruby-core #10293
On 13/02/07, Steven Lumos <steven@lumos.us> wrote:
> "Farrel Lifson" <farrel.lifson@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I'm not sure if this is the correct list to ask this (let me know and
> > I'll scoot off to ruby-talk) but I'm having some issues with the
> > running make test-all with the ruby source. I'd like to start
> > experimenting with an idea I have for an RCR. The source (r11708)
> > compiles fine, but make test has 44 failures and make test-all doesn't
> > run anything at all:
> > farrel@nicodemus ~/Projects/ruby $ make test-all
> > ./miniruby  ./runruby.rb --extout=.ext -- "./test/runner.rb"
> > --basedir="./test" --runner=console
> > "./ruby ./test/runner.rb --basedir=./test --runner=console"
> > Loaded suite .
> > Started
> >
> > Finished in 0.000201 seconds.
> >
> > 0 tests, 0 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors
> >
> > Is there another make directive I should be using?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Farrel
>
> Did you disable extensions by chance? The targets I (think I) know
> about are:
>
>  test: runs ./rubytest.rb, which runs ./sample/test.rb and filters the results
>  test-all: runs unit tests for all extensions that have them
>  check: test then test-all
>
> If you disabled extensions, which seems a reasonable thing to do if
> you are hacking on ruby, then test-all should do nothing.
>
> Steve
>
>
>

I actually don't know if I disabled extensions I just downloaded the
source ran autoconf then make. I've written unit tests for the code I
want to implement and put it in test/ruby/test_array.rb as I'm
modifying array.c however I can't seem to find what executes the tests
in test_array.rb. make test doesn't seem to be it and make test-all
does nothing. Any pointers? Should I put my testing code elsewhere?

Thanks
Farrel

In This Thread