ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#10157] Re: Including classes — Pit Capitain <pit@...>

Ola Bini schrieb:

9 messages 2007/02/01
[#10159] Re: Including classes — Pit Capitain <pit@...> 2007/02/01

Ola Bini schrieb:
[#10160] Re: Including classes — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/01

On Feb 1, 2007, at 7:16 AM, Pit Capitain wrote:
[#10161] Re: Including classes — Pit Capitain <pit@...> 2007/02/01

James Edward Gray II schrieb:
[#10162] Re: Including classes — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2007/02/01

On 2/1/07, Ola Bini <ola.bini@ki.se> wrote:
[#10163] Re: Including classes — _why <why@...> 2007/02/01

On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 10:58:52PM +0900, Austin Ziegler wrote:
[#10168] Re: Including classes — Daniel DeLorme <dan-ml@...42.com> 2007/02/02

Austin Ziegler wrote:
[#10173] Re: Including classes — gwtmp01@... 2007/02/02

[#10165] Re: Including classes — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2007/02/01

On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 06:49:55AM +0900, Ola Bini wrote:

[#10167] SVN revision corresponding to 1.8.5_p12? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>

Simple question: what SVN revision corresponds to the 1.8.5_p12 release?

4 messages 2007/02/02
[#10169] Re: SVN revision corresponding to 1.8.5_p12? — "Vincent Isambart" <vincent.isambart@...> 2007/02/02

Him
[#10170] Re: SVN revision corresponding to 1.8.5_p12? — "Vincent Isambart" <vincent.isambart@...> 2007/02/02

Hi,
[#10171] Re: SVN revision corresponding to 1.8.5_p12? — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2007/02/02

Vincent Isambart wrote:

[#10172] Discrepancy between GetoptLong.new and documentation — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8384, was opened at 2007-02-02 10:06

1 message 2007/02/02

[#10174] math.c, acosh.h, domain_check, MS Windows - possible bug — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2007/02/02
[#10178] Re: math.c, acosh.h, domain_check, MS Windows - possible bug — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/02/03

Hi,

[#10185] Ruby 1.9: Why the change to the return values of #instance_variables? — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...>

I have been preparing a release of Transaction::Simple 1.4 and want to

4 messages 2007/02/03
[#10187] Re: Ruby 1.9: Why the change to the return values of #instance_variables? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/02/04

Hi,
[#10188] Re: Ruby 1.9: Why the change to the return values of #instance_variables? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/02/04

Hi,
[#10189] Re: Ruby 1.9: Why the change to the return values of #instance_variables? — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2007/02/04

On 2/3/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#10186] Reusing Ruby's tests via svn:externals — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...>

Would there be any objection to JRuby including a few SVN externals

1 message 2007/02/03

[#10190] Added method ole_query_interface to WIN32OLE — <noreply@...>

Patches item #8437, was opened at 2007-02-05 11:35

1 message 2007/02/05

[#10193] String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...>

Hi,

41 messages 2007/02/05
[#10197] Re: String.ord — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/02/06

Hi,
[#10198] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#10199] Re: String.ord — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2007/02/06

David Flanagan wrote:
[#10200] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Daniel Berger wrote:
[#10208] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:
[#10213] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/06

Nikolai Weibull wrote:
[#10215] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:
[#10216] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/07

Nikolai Weibull wrote:
[#10218] Re: String.ord — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/02/07

Quoting david@davidflanagan.com, on Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:10:52AM +0900:
[#10226] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/07

On 2/7/07, Sam Roberts <sroberts@uniserve.com> wrote:
[#10232] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/07

Nikolai Weibull wrote:
[#10234] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/07

On 2/7/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:
[#10235] Re: String.ord — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...> 2007/02/07

I have to agree with David here. All he is pointing out is that an
[#10237] Re: String.ord — "Matt Pattison" <matchbo@...> 2007/02/07

On 2/8/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:
[#10240] Re: String.ord — Gavin Kistner <gavin@...> 2007/02/08

On Feb 7, 2007, at 3:57 PM, Matt Pattison wrote:
[#10238] Re: String.ord — "Micah Wylde" <wyldeone@...> 2007/02/08

I'm not a contributor, but I am a user of ruby, and there is a
[#10241] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/08

On 2/8/07, Micah Wylde <wyldeone@gmail.com> wrote:
[#10242] Re: String.ord — Unknown <borg@...3.net> 2007/02/08

On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Micah Wylde wrote:
[#10243] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/08

On 2/8/07, Unknown <borg@uu3.net> wrote:
[#10225] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/07

On 2/7/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:
[#10207] Re: String.ord — dblack@... 2007/02/06

Hi --
[#10201] Re: String.ord — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/02/06

Hi,
[#10209] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#10212] Re: String.ord — dblack@... 2007/02/06

Hi --
[#10214] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/06

On 2/6/07, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#10217] Re: String.ord — dblack@... 2007/02/07

Hi --
[#10224] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/07

On 2/7/07, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#10229] Re: String.ord — dblack@... 2007/02/07

Hi --
[#10231] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/07

On 2/7/07, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#10219] Re: String.ord — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/02/07

Hi,
[#10228] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/07

On 2/7/07, Ola Bini <ola.bini@ki.se> wrote:
[#10233] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/07

Ola Bini wrote:
[#10248] Re: String.ord — Steven Lumos <steven@...> 2007/02/09

"Nikolai Weibull" <now@bitwi.se> writes:
[#10250] Re: String.ord — Unknown <borg@...3.net> 2007/02/09

[#10251] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/09

On 2/9/07, Steven Lumos <steven@lumos.us> wrote:
[#10275] Re: String.ord — mathew <meta@...> 2007/02/10

On 2/8/07, Steven Lumos <steven@lumos.us> wrote:
[#10277] Re: String.ord — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2007/02/10

On 2/10/07, mathew <meta@pobox.com> wrote:
[#10194] Re: String.ord — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/02/05

On 2/5/07, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> wrote:
[#10195] Re: String.ord — David Flanagan <david@...> 2007/02/05

Nikolai Weibull wrote:
[#10202] Re: String.ord — Gavin Kistner <gavin@...> 2007/02/06

On Feb 5, 2007, at 3:54 PM, David Flanagan wrote:

[#10220] Can we add a link to ViewVC in the ruby-cvs commit mails? — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...>

Hello,

4 messages 2007/02/07
[#10283] Re: Can we add a link to ViewVC in the ruby-cvs commit mails? — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...> 2007/02/13

I noticed that the ruby-cvs mail now has links to ViewVC.
[#10221] Re: Can we add a link to ViewVC in the ruby-cvs commit mails? — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2007/02/07

Hi,
[#10222] Re: Can we add a link to ViewVC in the ruby-cvs commit mails? — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...> 2007/02/07

On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 17:10:00 +0900, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:

[#10223] Ruby/YARV thread question — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2007/02/07
[#10252] Re: Ruby/YARV thread question — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2007/02/09

Hi,

[#10230] Test::Unit::AutoRunner#parse_args bug, attributable to optparse documentation. — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...>

3 messages 2007/02/07
[#10239] Re: [PATCH] Test::Unit::AutoRunner#parse_args bug, attributable to optparse documentation. — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2007/02/08

Hi,
[#10244] Re: [PATCH] Test::Unit::AutoRunner#parse_args bug, attributable to optparse documentation. — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2007/02/08

On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 01:06:55PM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#10236] Build Problem — Andreas Hauser <andy-ruby-core@...>

Hoi,

1 message 2007/02/07

[#10245] Define text color in rdoc html — <noreply@...>

Patches item #8513, was opened at 2007-02-08 10:35

1 message 2007/02/08

[#10246] Why are Symbol#object_id and Symbol#to_i different? — "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@...>

On my system, it appears that the result of to_i is simply object_id / 10 f=

3 messages 2007/02/08
[#10247] Re: Why are Symbol#object_id and Symbol#to_i different? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/02/09

Hi,
[#10249] Re: Why are Symbol#object_id and Symbol#to_i different? — "John Lam (CLR)" <jflam@...> 2007/02/09

Great, thanks!

[#10253] Module:constants returns unexpected result — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8537, was opened at 2007-02-09 17:23

2 messages 2007/02/09
[#10264] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8537 ] Module:constants returns unexpected result — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/02/09

On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 02:23:55AM +0900, noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:

[#10254] uninitialized variable in function rb_syswait() — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8538, was opened at 2007-02-09 17:25

4 messages 2007/02/09
[#10265] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8538 ] uninitialized variable in function rb_syswait() — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/02/09

On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 02:25:43AM +0900, noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
[#10272] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8538 ] uninitialized variable in function rb_syswait() — Unknown <borg@...3.net> 2007/02/10

[#10274] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8538 ] uninitialized variable in function rb_syswait() — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org> 2007/02/10

> > In C, static variables are default initialized to 0.

[#10255] String:upto loops forever if argument is modified inside block — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8539, was opened at 2007-02-09 17:27

3 messages 2007/02/09
[#10260] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8539 ] String:upto loops forever if argument is modified inside block — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...> 2007/02/09

On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 06:27:31PM +0100, noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
[#10261] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8539 ] String:upto loops forever if argument is modified inside block — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/02/09

> -----Original Message-----

[#10256] Unexpected behaviour if IO:write will be overwritten — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8540, was opened at 2007-02-09 17:29

2 messages 2007/02/09
[#10263] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8540 ] Unexpected behaviour if IO:write will be overwritten — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2007/02/09

noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:

[#10257] coredump when invoking Kernel:syscall — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8541, was opened at 2007-02-09 17:31

5 messages 2007/02/09
[#10267] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8541 ] coredump when invoking Kernel:syscall — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/02/09

On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 02:31:48AM +0900, noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
[#10278] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8541 ] coredump when invoking Kernel:syscall — Tadashi Saito <shiba@...2.accsnet.ne.jp> 2007/02/11

Hello all,
[#10282] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8541 ] coredump when invoking Kernel:syscall — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2007/02/12

Hi,
[#10285] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8541 ] coredump when invoking Kernel:syscall — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2007/02/13

At Sat, 10 Feb 2007 08:30:41 +0900,

[#10258] Unexpected exception when invoking Kernel:syscall — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8542, was opened at 2007-02-09 17:35

1 message 2007/02/09

[#10259] Segmentation fault: Ruby 1.8.5 Under VC++ express 2005 — "z wen" <zhimin.wen@...>

Hi

8 messages 2007/02/09
[#10266] Re: Segmentation fault: Ruby 1.8.5 Under VC++ express 2005 — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2007/02/09

Hell,
[#10268] Re: Segmentation fault: Ruby 1.8.5 Under VC++ express 2005 — Masaki Suketa <masaki.suketa@...> 2007/02/10

Hello,
[#10270] Re: Segmentation fault: Ruby 1.8.5 Under VC++ express 2005 — "z wen" <zhimin.wen@...> 2007/02/10

On 2/10/07, Masaki Suketa <masaki.suketa@nifty.ne.jp> wrote:
[#10317] Re: Segmentation fault: Ruby 1.8.5 Under VC++ express 2005 — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2007/02/15

Hello,
[#10319] Re: Segmentation fault: Ruby 1.8.5 Under VC++ express 2005 — Masaki Suketa <masaki.suketa@...> 2007/02/15

Hello,
[#10320] Re: Segmentation fault: Ruby 1.8.5 Under VC++ express 2005 — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2007/02/15

Hello,
[#10318] Re: Segmentation fault: Ruby 1.8.5 Under VC++ express 2005 — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2007/02/15

Hello,

[#10262] Limiting 卒卒 or popen subprocess time — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch)

Hi,

3 messages 2007/02/09
[#10273] Re: Limiting 卒卒 or popen subprocess time — "Simon Strandgaard" <neoneye@...> 2007/02/10

On 2/9/07, Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@danisch.de> wrote:
[#10271] Re: Limiting 卒卒 or popen subprocess time — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch) 2007/02/10

...found the solution by reading ruby sources:

[#10269] YAML::Omap loses entries, replacing them with random references — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8548, was opened at 2007-02-09 20:23

1 message 2007/02/10

[#10276] fastthread now default in ruby_1_8 — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>

Hi,

4 messages 2007/02/10
[#10308] Re: [ANN] fastthread now default in ruby_1_8 — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2007/02/14

On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 07:00 +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#10311] Re: [ANN] fastthread now default in ruby_1_8 — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2007/02/15

At Thu, 15 Feb 2007 07:31:27 +0900,
[#10315] Re: [ANN] fastthread now default in ruby_1_8 — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2007/02/15

On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 11:57 +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote:

[#10279] Singleton Inheritance? — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

I am in the process of converting Ruby Hacker's Guide to English.

2 messages 2007/02/11
[#10281] Re: Singleton Inheritance? — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/02/11

Quoting ceo@hawthorne-press.com, on Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 03:27:44AM +0900:

[#10280] Mistake in Singleton Image — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

Sorry the second chart was "ch_class_singleton.jpg" NOT

1 message 2007/02/11

[#10284] Can't seem to run tests? — "Farrel Lifson" <farrel.lifson@...>

Hi there,

5 messages 2007/02/13
[#10287] Re: Can't seem to run tests? — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...> 2007/02/13

On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 06:35:15AM +0100, Farrel Lifson wrote:
[#10292] Re: Can't seem to run tests? — Steven Lumos <steven@...> 2007/02/13

"Farrel Lifson" <farrel.lifson@gmail.com> writes:
[#10293] Re: Can't seem to run tests? — "Farrel Lifson" <farrel.lifson@...> 2007/02/13

On 13/02/07, Steven Lumos <steven@lumos.us> wrote:
[#10328] Re: Can't seem to run tests? — Steven Lumos <steven@...> 2007/02/15

"Farrel Lifson" <farrel.lifson@gmail.com> writes:

[#10286] gsub to replace small amount of content with a large amount causes original trailing text to repeat — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8592, was opened at 2007-02-12 22:26

1 message 2007/02/13

[#10288] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8597, was opened at 2007-02-13 16:10

12 messages 2007/02/13
[#10294] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8597 ] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/02/13

On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:10:37AM +0900, noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
[#10296] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8597 ] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/02/13

Hi,
[#10303] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8597 ] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/02/14

On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 08:38:50AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#10310] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8597 ] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/02/14

[#10314] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8597 ] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/02/15

Hi,
[#10327] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8597 ] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/02/15

On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 01:41:26PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#10360] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8597 ] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — Bram Senders <bram@...> 2007/02/17

On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:10:37AM +0900, noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
[#10361] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8597 ] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/02/18

Hi,
[#10362] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8597 ] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — Bram Senders <bram@...> 2007/02/18

On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 11:27:58AM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#10370] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8597 ] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/02/19

On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 06:25:30AM +0900, Bram Senders wrote:
[#10407] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8597 ] Socket library should support abstract unix sockets — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/02/23

*ping*

[#10289] Communicating Ruby programs and processor choice — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>

Pardon this intrusion, as this is somewhat OT, but I need answers from

1 message 2007/02/13

[#10290] URI::Generic#userinfo — "Jonas Pfenniger" <zimbatm@...>

Hello,

9 messages 2007/02/13
[#10295] Re: [PATCH] URI::Generic#userinfo — mathew <meta@...> 2007/02/13

Those are not errors. Username and password are not allowed in HTTP
[#10297] Re: [PATCH] URI::Generic#userinfo — "Jonas Pfenniger" <zimbatm@...> 2007/02/14

2007/2/13, mathew <meta@pobox.com>:
[#10322] Re: [PATCH] URI::Generic#userinfo — mathew <meta@...> 2007/02/15

On 2/14/07, Jonas Pfenniger <zimbatm@oree.ch> wrote:
[#10333] Re: [PATCH] URI::Generic#userinfo — "Jonas Pfenniger" <zimbatm@...> 2007/02/16

2007/2/15, mathew <meta@pobox.com>:
[#10298] Re: [PATCH] URI::Generic#userinfo — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...> 2007/02/14

Hello Jonas,
[#10299] Re: [PATCH] URI::Generic#userinfo — "Jonas Pfenniger" <zimbatm@...> 2007/02/14

2007/2/14, Zev Blut <rubyzbibd@ubit.com>:
[#10312] Re: [PATCH] URI::Generic#userinfo — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2007/02/15

At Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:47:23 +0900,
[#10316] Re: [PATCH] URI::Generic#userinfo — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2007/02/15

At Thu, 15 Feb 2007 11:58:24 +0900,

[#10291] debug.rb does not work in some cases? — Martin Krauskopf <Martin.Krauskopf@...>

Hi,

1 message 2007/02/13

[#10300] rb_class_real Question? — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

OK - Stupid Question: What (in english prose) is this line actually doing???

2 messages 2007/02/14
[#10309] Re: rb_class_real Question? — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...> 2007/02/14

On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 06:42:04PM +0100, Charles Thornton wrote:

[#10301] rb_class_real — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

OK - I look at again --- I seem to remember it was confusing the

2 messages 2007/02/14
[#10304] Re: rb_class_real — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/02/14

Hi,

[#10302] RHG Translation project — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

Sorry --- But this code is driving me a little crazy

1 message 2007/02/14

[#10305] character codes in regular expressions? — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch)

Hi,

2 messages 2007/02/14
[#10306] Re: character codes in regular expressions? — murphy <murphy@...> 2007/02/14

> How would one write a regular expression for matching any character with

[#10307] fastthread: rb_bug() due to stale wait queue entries — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8663, was opened at 2007-02-14 17:25

1 message 2007/02/14

[#10313] Code frozen for Ruby 1.8.6 — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>

Soft code freeze for Ruby 1.8.6 has just begun. I'll make a

1 message 2007/02/15

[#10321] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8676, was opened at 2007-02-15 10:09

11 messages 2007/02/15
[#11160] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8676 ] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/05/12

Hi,
[#11161] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8676 ] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2007/05/12

On 5/12/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#11162] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8676 ] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/05/13

Hi,
[#11164] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8676 ] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2007/05/13

On 13/05/07, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#11182] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8676 ] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2007/05/16

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#11163] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8676 ] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2007/05/13

On 5/12/07, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:
[#11181] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8676 ] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2007/05/16

Nikolai Weibull wrote:
[#11183] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8676 ] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/05/16

Hi,
[#11184] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8676 ] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2007/05/16

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#11186] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8676 ] File.basename fails on Windows root paths — gus <gus@...> 2007/05/16

On 5/16/07 4:58 AM, "Daniel Berger" <djberg96@gmail.com> wrote:

[#10323] Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

Some of the Ruby code used by TextMate makes use of xmlrpc/

31 messages 2007/02/15
[#10324] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/02/15

> -----Original Message-----
[#10326] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/15

On Feb 15, 2007, at 1:29 PM, Berger, Daniel wrote:
[#10337] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

On Feb 15, 2007, at 1:33 PM, James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#10339] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — zdennis <zdennis@...> 2007/02/16

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[#10340] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

On Feb 16, 2007, at 9:33 AM, zdennis wrote:
[#10375] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/20

On Feb 16, 2007, at 7:49 AM, James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#10376] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2007/02/20

At Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:33:08 +0900,
[#10378] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/20

On Feb 20, 2007, at 7:50 AM, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#10379] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2007/02/20

At Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:55:42 +0900,
[#10380] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/20

On Feb 20, 2007, at 8:46 AM, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#10391] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2007/02/21

Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#10392] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/21

On Feb 21, 2007, at 4:25 PM, Michael Neumann wrote:
[#10400] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2007/02/23

At Thu, 22 Feb 2007 07:25:21 +0900,
[#10403] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/23

On Feb 22, 2007, at 10:27 PM, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#10342] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

While I am complaining about xmlrpc, we have another issue. It's
[#10343] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — Alex Young <alex@...> 2007/02/16

James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#10344] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

On Feb 16, 2007, at 12:08 PM, Alex Young wrote:
[#10346] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/02/16

On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 04:39:08AM +0900, James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#10348] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

On Feb 16, 2007, at 4:17 PM, Sam Roberts wrote:
[#10355] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/02/17

Quoting james@grayproductions.net, on Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 07:45:44AM +0900:
[#10347] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — Alex Young <alex@...> 2007/02/16

James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#10349] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

On Feb 16, 2007, at 4:27 PM, Alex Young wrote:
[#10352] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

On Feb 16, 2007, at 5:08 PM, James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#10356] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — Alex Young <alex@...> 2007/02/17

James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#10377] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/20

On Feb 17, 2007, at 2:59 AM, Alex Young wrote:
[#10382] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/02/20

On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 10:53:20PM +0900, James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#10383] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/20

On Feb 20, 2007, at 3:29 PM, Sam Roberts wrote:
[#10401] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2007/02/23

OK, revised patch committed.
[#10350] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2007/02/16

On Feb 16, 2007, at 09:44, James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#10351] Re: Trouble with xmlrpc — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2007/02/16

On Feb 16, 2007, at 5:15 PM, Eric Hodel wrote:

[#10325] Unexpected behavior of splat (*) in parallel assignment — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8679, was opened at 2007-02-15 14:29

2 messages 2007/02/15
[#10353] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8679 ] Unexpected behavior of splat (*) in parallel assignment — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2007/02/16

[#10329] open-uri proxy authentication for 1.8.6 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

I'd like to see open-uri backported from trunk to ruby_1_8. I wasn't

2 messages 2007/02/16
[#10332] Re: open-uri proxy authentication for 1.8.6 — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2007/02/16

At Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:52:51 +0900,

[#10334] make Test::Unit output more Emacs friendly format — Kouhei Sutou <kou@...>

Hi,

6 messages 2007/02/16
[#10335] Re: [PATCH] make Test::Unit output more Emacs friendly format — Vincent Fourmond <vincent.fourmond@9online.fr> 2007/02/16

Kouhei Sutou wrote:
[#10336] Re: [PATCH] make Test::Unit output more Emacs friendly format — Kouhei Sutou <kou@...> 2007/02/16

Hi,
[#10338] Re: [PATCH] make Test::Unit output more Emacs friendly format — Vincent Fourmond <vincent.fourmond@9online.fr> 2007/02/16

Kouhei Sutou wrote:
[#10365] Re: [PATCH] make Test::Unit output more Emacs friendly format — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/02/19

Quoting kou@cozmixng.org, on Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 09:37:19PM +0900:
[#10367] Re: [PATCH] make Test::Unit output more Emacs friendly format — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...> 2007/02/19

On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:54:03 +0900, Sam Roberts <sroberts@uniserve.com>

[#10341] matz/knu: Requesting committer privileges to add Win32 NTLM authentication to net/http — "Justin Bailey" <jgbailey@...>

Matz, Mr. Musha, and All,

3 messages 2007/02/16
[#10386] Re: matz/knu: Requesting committer privileges to add Win32 NTLM authentication to net/http — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2007/02/21

It sounds fine to me and I have no objection to putting it into 1.8
[#10390] Re: matz/knu: Requesting committer privileges to add Win32 NTLM authentication to net/http — "Justin Bailey" <jgbailey@...> 2007/02/21

Thanks for your reply below - I will refactor the names and get a patch

[#10354] Add option to Test::Unit::Assertions#assert_raise to allow subclasses — <noreply@...>

Patches item #8716, was opened at 2007-02-16 19:24

1 message 2007/02/17

[#10357] Ruby 1.8.6 preview1 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>

Hi,

4 messages 2007/02/17
[#10358] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 preview1 has been released — Lyle Johnson <lyle.johnson@...> 2007/02/17

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[#10359] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 preview1 has been released — Lyle Johnson <lyle.johnson@...> 2007/02/17

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[#10384] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 preview1 has been released — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2007/02/21

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:

[#10364] Question about ToDo file — Eric Stratmann <bobwhoops@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2007/02/18
[#10368] Re: Question about ToDo file — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2007/02/19

Hi,

[#10366] wrong syscall name in error message for #peeraddr — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...>

1 message 2007/02/19

[#10369] Sandbox? — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>

Hi,

1 message 2007/02/19

[#10371] 1.8.6p1 warning from autorunner.rb — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>

Hi all,

1 message 2007/02/20

[#10372] Stateful I/O interface — "Tony Arcieri" <tony@...>

Has anyone ever suggested adding a stateful I/O multiplexing interface which

7 messages 2007/02/20
[#10374] Re: Stateful I/O interface — "Tony Arcieri" <tony@...> 2007/02/20

Yes, that's more of an I/O framework, and it's built around Kernel#select at
[#10395] Re: Stateful I/O interface — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2007/02/22

On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 11:24:52AM +0900, Tony Arcieri wrote:
[#10396] Re: Stateful I/O interface — "Tony Arcieri" <tony@...> 2007/02/23

On 2/22/07, Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> wrote:
[#10398] Re: Stateful I/O interface — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...> 2007/02/23

On 2/22/07, Tony Arcieri <tony@clickcaster.com> wrote:
[#10399] Re: Stateful I/O interface — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...> 2007/02/23

On 2/22/07, Tony Arcieri <tony@clickcaster.com> wrote:
[#10405] Re: Stateful I/O interface — "Tony Arcieri" <tony@...> 2007/02/23

I'm looking primarily for scalability improvements in terms of handling

[#10381] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 preview1 has been released - WEBrick error — mathew <meta@...>

Built and tested OK, except for 1 error:

1 message 2007/02/20

[#10385] Services of ruby-lang.org will be stopped — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2007/02/21
[#10394] Re: [ANN] Services of ruby-lang.org will be stopped — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2007/02/22

Hi,

[#10387] vendor_ruby support — Marcus Rueckert <mrueckert@...>

Hi,

6 messages 2007/02/21
[#10388] Re: [PATCH] vendor_ruby support — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/02/21

Hi,
[#10389] Re: [PATCH] vendor_ruby support — Marcus Rueckert <mrueckert@...> 2007/02/21

hi,
[#10417] Re: [PATCH] vendor_ruby support — "Alexey I. Froloff" <sir_raorn@...> 2007/02/24

* Marcus Rueckert <mrueckert@> [070221 17:59]:
[#10419] Re: [PATCH] vendor_ruby support — Marcus Rueckert <mrueckert@...> 2007/02/24

On 2007-02-25 06:41:29 +0900, Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
[#10421] Re: [PATCH] vendor_ruby support — "Alexey I. Froloff" <sir_raorn@...> 2007/02/25

* Marcus Rueckert <mrueckert@> [070225 02:11]:

[#10393] is Array#pack supposed to truncate integers in 1.9? — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...>

1 message 2007/02/21

[#10397] Ruby 1.8.5 not installing a working digest.rb on MacOSX — "Ryan Waldron" <ryan.waldron@...>

While trying to install a Rails app on my Mac (10.4 Tiger), I ran into

5 messages 2007/02/23
[#10402] Re: Ruby 1.8.5 not installing a working digest.rb on MacOSX — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2007/02/23

At Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:44:01 +0900,
[#10404] Re: Ruby 1.8.5 not installing a working digest.rb on MacOSX — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...> 2007/02/23

Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#10409] Re: Ruby 1.8.5 not installing a working digest.rb on MacOSX — "Ryan Waldron" <ryan.waldron@...> 2007/02/23

On 2/22/07, Akinori MUSHA <knu@idaemons.org> wrote:
[#10410] Re: Ruby 1.8.5 not installing a working digest.rb on MacOSX — Steven Lumos <steven@...> 2007/02/23

Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@qwest.com> writes:

[#10406] Singleton Class Creation Differences (rb_singleton_class() & rb_define_class_id() ) — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

While Looking closely at Singleton Creation, it became obvious that

1 message 2007/02/23

[#10408] TypeError in irb tab completion — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8841, was opened at 2007-02-23 15:21

1 message 2007/02/23

[#10411] preview2 delayed — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>

Hi,

1 message 2007/02/24

[#10412] FlashGet errors with One-Click Ruby — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8847, was opened at 2007-02-24 09:41

1 message 2007/02/24

[#10413] Support for multiple-files breakpoint-management with Emacs — Martin Nordholts <enselic@...>

Hello!

5 messages 2007/02/24
[#10415] Re: [patch] Support for multiple-files breakpoint-management with Emacs — Martin Nordholts <enselic@...> 2007/02/24

Sorry for misformatting. This time it should be OK (enclosed in
[#10418] Re: [patch] Support for multiple-files breakpoint-management with Emacs — Martin Nordholts <enselic@...> 2007/02/24

It appears as if the debugger doesn't support 'b file.rb:25', but it
[#10424] Re: [patch] Support for multiple-files breakpoint-management with Emacs — Martin Krauskopf <Martin.Krauskopf@...> 2007/02/26

Martin Nordholts wrote:
[#10425] Re: [patch] Support for multiple-files breakpoint-management with Emacs — Martin Nordholts <enselic@...> 2007/02/26

Ah ok, so you already fixed it, but by patching debug.rb instead?

[#10414] Ruby 1.8.6 preview2 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>

Hi,

10 messages 2007/02/24
[#10426] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 preview2 has been released — "Daniel Berger" <djberg96@...> 2007/02/26

On 2/24/07, Akinori MUSHA <knu@idaemons.org> wrote:
[#10427] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 preview2 has been released — "Ryan Waldron" <ryan.waldron@...> 2007/02/26

Beta versions of rake from 0.7.1.5 on no longer rely on
[#10428] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 preview2 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2007/02/26

At Mon, 26 Feb 2007 22:37:37 +0900,
[#10435] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 preview2 has been released — Jim Weirich <jim@...> 2007/02/27

Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#10436] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 preview2 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2007/02/27

At Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:44:46 +0900,
[#10416] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 preview2 has been released — "Lyle Johnson" <lyle.johnson@...> 2007/02/24

On 2/24/07, Akinori MUSHA <knu@idaemons.org> wrote:
[#10439] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 preview2 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2007/02/27

At Sun, 25 Feb 2007 01:14:27 +0900,
[#10432] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 preview2 has been released — "David Symonds" <dsymonds@...> 2007/02/27

On 2/25/07, Akinori MUSHA <knu@idaemons.org> wrote:
[#10440] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 preview2 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2007/02/27

At Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:43:19 +0900,

[#10420] Test::Unit shows result even if interrupted — Kouhei Sutou <kou@...>

Hi,

7 messages 2007/02/25
[#15286] Re: [PATCH] Test::Unit shows result even if interrupted — Steven Lumos <steven@...> 2008/01/29

Kouhei Sutou <kou@cozmixng.org> writes:
[#15296] Re: [PATCH] Test::Unit shows result even if interrupted — Kouhei Sutou <kou@...> 2008/01/29

Hi,
[#15299] Re: [PATCH] Test::Unit shows result even if interrupted — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/01/29

> How do you do your writing code and running test cycle?
[#15310] Re: [PATCH] Test::Unit shows result even if interrupted — Kouhei Sutou <kou@...> 2008/01/30

Hi,
[#15313] Re: [PATCH] Test::Unit shows result even if interrupted — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/01/30

Kouhei Sutou wrote:
[#15138] Re: [PATCH] Test::Unit shows result even if interrupted — Kouhei Sutou <kou@...> 2008/01/19

Hi,

[#10422] Possible problem submitting patch #8513 — Luther <lutherfire@...>

On 2007-2-8, I submitted a patch on rubyforge. Two days later, I

2 messages 2007/02/26
[#10423] Re: Possible problem submitting patch #8513 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2007/02/26

On Feb 25, 2007, at 21:36, Luther wrote:

[#10429] YAML fails to load a Hash containing a Pathname — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8886, was opened at 2007-02-26 14:42

2 messages 2007/02/26
[#10431] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8886 ] YAML fails to load a Hash containing a Pathname — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2007/02/26

noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:

[#10430] Problem with on-auto-image-based dlls on cygwin (--enable-auto-image-base) — "Bjarne Christiansen" <bjarne.christiansen@...>

Hi,

1 message 2007/02/26

[#10433] openssl segmentation fault — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8903, was opened at 2007-02-27 01:08

2 messages 2007/02/27
[#10444] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-8903 ] openssl segmentation fault — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/02/27

On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:08:44AM +0900, noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:

[#10434] Request for more thorough introspective documentation — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #8906, was opened at 2007-02-27 05:15

1 message 2007/02/27

[#10437] MIME decoding confused by non-MIME characters — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>

Could someone who has bleeding-edge Ruby installed please test the

6 messages 2007/02/27
[#10451] Re: MIME decoding confused by non-MIME characters — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2007/02/28

Brian Candler wrote:
[#10455] Re: MIME decoding confused by non-MIME characters — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/02/28

On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 09:18:06PM +0900, Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
[#10456] Re: MIME decoding confused by non-MIME characters — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2007/02/28

Sam Roberts wrote:
[#10459] Re: MIME decoding confused by non-MIME characters — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2007/03/01

On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 07:52:08AM +0900, Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
[#10441] Re: MIME decoding confused by non-MIME characters — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2007/02/27

On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 09:20:56AM +0000, Brian Candler wrote:

[#10438] rdoc for Kernel#select broken? — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>

On the two systems I've tried (one 1.8.4/Ubuntu, one 1.8.5/CentOS), the

1 message 2007/02/27

[#10442] Latest Update to RHG — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

I am releasing the lastest version of the Ruby Hacker's Guide.

7 messages 2007/02/27
[#10452] Re: Latest Update to RHG — Mathieu Blondel <mblondel@...> 2007/02/28

Hi,
[#10453] Re: Latest Update to RHG -- — Charles Thornton <ceo@...> 2007/02/28

[#10454] Re: Latest Update to RHG -- — Mathieu Blondel <mblondel@...> 2007/02/28

Charles Thornton wrote:
[#10470] Re: Latest Update to RHG -- — Charles Thornton <ceo@...> 2007/03/01

Mathieu Blondel wrote:
[#10472] Re: Latest Update to RHG -- — Mathieu Blondel <mblondel@...> 2007/03/01

Charles Thornton wrote:
[#10486] Re: Latest Update to RHG -- — Charles Thornton <ceo@...> 2007/03/02

Mathieu Blondel wrote:

[#10443] ruby1.8 case-insensitive matches fail when using hex escapes — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...>

1 message 2007/02/27

[#10445] PATCH: Emacs support for 'ruby-debug' (rdebug) : rdebug.el — Martin Nordholts <enselic@...>

Hello,

5 messages 2007/02/27
[#10447] (new) PATCH: Emacs support for 'ruby-debug' (rdebug) — Martin Nordholts <enselic@...> 2007/02/27

This is a patch against trunk that also changes ./misc/README. The patch
[#10482] Re: (new) PATCH: Emacs support for 'ruby-debug' (rdebug) — Martin Nordholts <enselic@...> 2007/03/02

If I want someone to look at the patch and consider it for includsion,
[#10497] Re: (new) PATCH: Emacs support for 'ruby-debug' (rdebug) — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...> 2007/03/05

On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 00:28:03 +0900, Martin Nordholts <enselic@gmail.com>
[#10539] Re: (new) PATCH: Emacs support for 'ruby-debug' (rdebug) — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2007/03/10

At Wed, 28 Feb 2007 08:39:09 +0900,

[#10446] Potential RCR?: Array#join with block — "Farrel Lifson" <farrel.lifson@...>

Does anyone think Array#join with a block is a potential RCR?

3 messages 2007/02/27
[#10448] Re: Potential RCR?: Array#join with block — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2007/02/28

On 2/27/07, Farrel Lifson <farrel.lifson@gmail.com> wrote:
[#10449] Re: Potential RCR?: Array#join with block — "Farrel Lifson" <farrel.lifson@...> 2007/02/28

On 28/02/07, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:

[#10450] Subtle difference between m { |arg| do_something(arg) } and m(&method(:do_something)) — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org>

[~/tmp]% cat test.rb

1 message 2007/02/28

[#10457] Autoprefixing C:\ for File.expand_path? — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

Ruby 1.8.5

1 message 2007/02/28

Re: String.ord

From: "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...>
Date: 2007-02-08 09:12:30 UTC
List: ruby-core #10241 
On 2/8/07, Micah Wylde <wyldeone@gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree that there shouldn't be methods that only work with certain
> strings. That, I think, just causes confusion and goes against the
> object-oriented principles of ruby.

Well, #to_i only works for certain Strings.  I don't see how it goes
against the object-oriented principles of Ruby.  Not that I know what
those principles are.

  nikolai

In This Thread

Prev Next